Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 2004 Page 6 of about 108 results (0.071 seconds)

Apr 27 2004 (SC)

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Asha Arun Gawali and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC2223; 2004CriLJ2484; JT2004(Suppl1)SC312; 2004(5)SCALE121; (2004)5SCC175

..... names of visitors who allegedly were a part of the conspiracy warranting detention of the detenu were not in the list of visitors during the concerned period, there is a patent admission about people getting unauthorised entry into the jails without their names being recorded in the official records something which would be impossible except with the connivance of those who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2004 (SC)

State Through S.P., New Delhi Vs. Ratan Lal Arora

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-26-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC2364; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)1011; (2005)1CALLT24(SC); 2004CriLJ2105; 111(2004)DLT250(SC); JT2004(5)SC352; 2004(5)SCALE67; (2004)4SCC590; 2004(3)SLJ331(SC)

..... to the provision so repealed shall, unless a different intention appears, be construed as references to the provision so re-enacted.]' 11. the object of the said provision, obvious and patently made known is that where any act or regulation is repealed and re-enacted, references in any other enactment to provisions of the repealed former enactment must be read and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2004 (SC)

Punjab and Sind Bank and anr. Vs. S. Ranveer Singh Bawa and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-21-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC2334; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)750; 2004(3)AWC2223(SC); 111(2004)DLT226(SC); 2004(77)DRJ337; [2004(101)FLR989]; JT2004(Suppl1)SC594; (2004)IILLJ573SC; 2004(4)SCALE816; (200

..... decision of the learned single judge, the appellant carried the matter in appeal to the division bench. by impugned judgment dated 5.9.2001, the division bench dismissed the letters patent appeal. hence, this civil appeal by special leave petition.3. in the case of bank of india v. o.p. swarnakar reported in : (2003)illj819sc , two questions arose for determination .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2004 (SC)

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Johri Mal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-21-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC3800; JT2004(Suppl1)SC443; 2004(5)SCALE1; (2004)4SCC714; 2004(3)SLJ175(SC)

..... exercise of power will be regarded as manifestly erroneous. if a power (whether legislative or administrative) is exercised on the basis of facts which do not exist and which are patently erroneous, such exercise of power will stand vitiated.'28. the scope and extent of power of the judicial review of the high court contained in article 226 of the constitution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2004 (SC)

N. Bhargavan Pillai (Dead) by Lrs. and anr. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-20-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC2317; 2004CriLJ2494; JT2004(Suppl1)SC194; 2004(2)KLT725(SC); 2004(4)SCALE693

..... relating to entrustment and mis-appropriation in our view are well merited and fully justified on the basis of evidence on record and do not suffer from any perversity or patent error of law to warrant interference.14. coming to the plea relating to benefits under the probation act, it is to be noted that section 18 of the said act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2004 (SC)

icpa Health Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vado ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-20-2004

Reported in : 2004(93)ECC441; 2004(167)ELT20(SC); 2004(4)SCALE820; (2004)4SCC481

..... of surgeons for rapid hand disinfections prior to surgery.5. at this stage, the two tariff items may be set out. tariff item 3003.10 reads as follows:'3003.10 - patent or proprietary medicaments, other thanthose medicaments which are exclusivelyayurvedic, unani, siddha, homoeopathic or bio-chemic.'tariff item no. 38.08 reads as follows:'3003.08 - insecticides, rodenticides, fungicides, herbicides,anti .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2004 (SC)

Ramesh Mehta Vs. Sanwal Chand Singhvi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-20-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC2258; JT2004(Suppl1)SC275; RLW2004(2)SC269; 2004(5)SCALE27; (2004)5SCC409; 2004(2)LC1307(SC)

..... number of votes'.25. the 'whole number of votes' whether should, in our opinion, be bread as a total number of elected votes or total number of members as it patently appears from the definition; is the question.26. it is accepted that the rules have not been altered despite the fact that amendments have been carried out in the municipalities .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2004 (SC)

Basheer @ N.P. Basheer Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-20-2004

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3837; 2004(94)ECC116; 2004(175)ELT12(SC); 2004(2)KLT1018(SC); 2004(5)SCALE688; (2004)5SCC659

order1. the appellant has been found guilty for the offence punishable under section 21 of the ndps act. the special judge sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of rs. 1 lac with a default sentence for 6 months. the conviction and sentence was challenged by the appellant before the high court. the high court confirmed the conviction and sentence.2. the prosecution case against the appellant was that on 23.2.2000 at about 4.15 p.m. the appellant was found in selling brown sugar. the pw-2 sub-inspector of police of nadakkavu police station got information that somebody was selling brown sugar and he recorded this information, copy of the same sent to immediate superior and along with the police party went to the place and he found the appellant there. on seeing pw-2 and others, the appellant tried to escape from the place and pw-2 prevented him from going and told him that it was suspected that the appellant was having brown sugar with him and his body is to be searched. pw-2 also apprised the appellant of his right under section 50 of the ndps act, and the appellant declined to have the privilege of his body being searched in the presence of magistrate/gazetted officer and therefore a search was conducted and from the pocket of the appellant small packets were recovered wherein brown sugar was found. pw-2 prepared a mazhar and recovered the same. on the side of the prosecution pws. 1 to 3 were examined. the appellant alleged that he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2004 (SC)

B.S. Adityan and ors. Vs. B. Ramachandran Adityan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-16-2004

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1947(SC); (SCSuppl)2004(4)CHN1; JT2004(5)SC370; (2004)4MLJ54(SC); RLW2004(3)SC441; 2004(5)SCALE43; (2004)9SCC720

..... distinction between administrative and judicial orders. it is urged that order from which the appeal was preferred was not a judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent and so no appeal lies to the division bench. reference is made to the decision of this court in institute of chartered accountants v. l.k. ratna and ors., : [1987 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2004 (SC)

Dr. Karan Singh Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2004

Reported in : 2004(1)ARBLR599(SC); 2004(2)JKJ1[SC]; JT2004(5)SC142; 2004(4)SCALE418; (2004)5SCC698

..... of the inspection committee above referred.8. the judgment of learned single judge was challenged by the appellant, the state government and the union of india by each filing letters patent appeal, the appellant claiming that all the articles ought to have been declared as his private property and the state government and union of india claiming that the writ petition ..... should have been dismissed by the learned single judge.9. by the impugned judgment, all the three letters patent appeals have been decided. the division bench has held that the appellant has not put forward any claim much less such claim having been recognized by the union of india .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //