Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1964 Page 2 of about 365 results (0.008 seconds)

Jul 29 1964 (HC)

Munsha Singh Sunder Singh and ors. Vs. Gurudit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-29-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H80

..... nos. 23 of 1960, 24 of 1960 and 25 of 1960), which are interconnected filed under clause 10 of the letters patent are directed against a judgment of a learned single judge who has decreed the suits of the plaintiffs to the extent indicated in his judgment in reversal of the decree .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1964 (HC)

Soma Vs. Brij Lal, Manohar Lal Aggarwal and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-10-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H110

..... go to her husband kishan chand and not to the appellant as her daughter. brij lal's appeal was, accordingly accepted and the plaintiffs suit was dismissed.(6) in letters patent appeal it has been argued by mr. jain on behalf of the appellant that shrimati indi became absolute owner of the land in dispute under the deed of gift and ..... khanna, j.(1) this letters patent appeal filed by shrimati soma is directed against the judgment of learned single judge whereby he accepted the appeal of brij lal defendant-respondent, reversed the decisions of the courts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 1964 (HC)

Bibi Amar Kaur Vs. Shiv Karan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-02-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H206

..... o. 21, r. 58 read with r. 63 of the code of civil procedure. the second appeal, in the circumstances, was dismissed. (6) i may state that when this letters patent appeal first came up for hearing before mehar singh and grover, jj. they found that certain facts were not clear and that it was necessary to have complete history of ..... (1) this letters patent appeal filed by bibi amar kaur is directed against the judgment and decree of learned single judge whereby he dismissed regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 1964 (HC)

National Rayon Corporation Ltd., Bombay Vs. the Additional Assistant E ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-16-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H62; [1964]15STC746(P& H)

dulat, j. (1) these three appeals under clause 10 of the letters patent (letters patent appeals nos. 263, 264 and 265 of 1963 ). arise out of a single judgment of shamsher bahadur, j., by which he dismissed three writ petitions brought on behalf of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 1964 (HC)

Dharam Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-26-1964

Reported in : AIR1966P& H468

..... appellant had been punished or that the action against him was mala fide. in the result, the writ petition was dismissed. hence this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent.2. mr. abnasha singh points out that although the learned single judge accepted the suggestion that the appellant had become a probationer with effect from the 1st october 1957 in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1964 (HC)

Shir Amir Singh Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-29-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H84

khanna, j.(1) this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent is directed against the order of learned single judge whereby he dismissed the petition of the appellant under article 226 of the constitution of india.(2) the brief facts of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1964 (HC)

The Union of India and ors. Vs. Tribhuwan Prakash Naryyar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-09-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H307

..... to bear their own costs. against this decision the union of india the chief settlement commissioner and other officer have filed the present appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent. (3) learned counsel for the appellants has strenuously argued that the question as to what is the valuation of a particular property is essentially one of the fact and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1964 (HC)

Pappu Suramma Vs. Boggavarapu Somanna (Died) Boggavarapu Suryanarayana ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-04-1964

Reported in : AIR1965AP51

..... , justice sanjeeva rao nayudu reversed the decision of the trial court and dismissed the petition for recovery of this interest. (4) in this appeal, under cl. 15 of the letters patent, it is this view of the learned judge that is impractical before us. it is urged by shri jagannadha rao on behalf of the appellant that since this money was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1964 (HC)

Bhaskara Chalamiah (Died) Piler Khasim Saheb and ors. Vs. the Body of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-23-1964

Reported in : AIR1965AP68

narasimham, j.(1) this is an appeal under the letters patent against an order of chandrasekhara sastry j. , in s. a. 1266 of 1959 remanding the case to the 1st appellate court for fresh disposal in the light of the observations .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1964 (HC)

Shivarudrappa Girimallappa Saboji and anr. Vs. Kapurchand Meghaji Marw ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-27-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Kant76; AIR1965Mys76; (1965)1MysLJ158

..... liable to be denounced as unconstitutional by reason of any repugnancy between its provisions and the provisions of the bombay civil courts act, 1869, or clause 16 of the letters patent, which are both existing laws for the obvious reason that the president's assent which the impugned act received rendered the repugnancy, if any, inconsequential under the provisions of ..... the suggested interpretation on the 13th and 46th entries of the concurrent list of the constitution cannot succeed and becomes unsustainable.(57) the provisions of clause 16 of the letters patent cannot therefore lend any assistance to the challenge to the constitutionality of sections 19 and 29(2)(c) of the impugned act.(58) but mr. savanur, however, contended ..... jurisdiction ensured by article 225 of the constitution or the continuance in operation of an existing law under article 372 is subject to similar legislation. clause 44 of the letters patent for the high court of bombay emphasises the vulnerability of the jurisdiction created by clause 16 to appropriate legislation. so, in my opinion, mr. savanur cannot derive any substance ..... in national sewing thread co. ltd. v. james chadwick and bros. ltd., : [1953]4scr1028 , the supreme court explained that legislative competence to alter the jurisdiction created by the letters patent also resided in the provincial legislature. likewise, the jurisdiction transmitted to this court by section 52 of the states reorganization act is again stated in section 69 of that act .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //