Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1964 Page 6 of about 365 results (0.010 seconds)

Aug 12 1964 (HC)

Mysore Machinery Manufacturers Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Labo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-12-1964

Reported in : (1965)ILLJ353Kant

..... respondent 1 has refused to accord approval for the dismissal of his four workmen (respondent 2 in each of these petitions, who will be hereinafter referred to as 'workmen') on patently erroneous grounds and therefore he seeks to have those orders quashed. 3. respondent 1 refused to accord the approvals prayed for under s. 33(2)(b) of the industrial disputes ..... so it must be held that the petitioner has complied with the conditions laid down in the proviso to s. 33(2)(b) of the act. respondent 1 committed a patent error of law in holding that the conditions laid down in the proviso in question have not been satisfied. the error committed by respondent 1, in this regard also, is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 1964 (HC)

V.V. Krishna Iyer Sons Vs. New Era Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Palghat

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-09-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Ker241

..... , 'an order will not be made if a sufficient case is not stated on the petition, even if such a case is proved in evidence.' also in re, spence's patent non-conducting composition and cement co., (1869) 9 eq. 9, where a supporting creditor was not allowed to rely upon his cause of action, which was not a cause of ..... the company have been mortgaged to an amount equal to or in excess of those assets or that the company has no assets was to render decisions like in re, patent artificial stone co. ltd., (1884) 34 l j ch 330, in re, lancashire brick and tile co ltd., (1865) 34 l j ch 331, in re, rica gold washing co .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1964 (HC)

Chapsibhai Dhanjibhai Vs. Purshottam Motilal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-1964

Reported in : AIR1964Bom287; (1964)66BOMLR525; 1964MhLJ668(SC)

..... has in the property, and which the errant purports to convey.' the entire question was fully reviewed by the division bench of the bombay high court in bavasaheb v. west patent press co. ltd. : air1954bom257 . the material part of the lease provided thus: ' ...... at the end of the remaining years outof the agreed period of 30 years, you may continue on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1964 (HC)

Azam Shah Vs. M.R. Tribunal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-18-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Bom76; (1964)66BOMLR605; ILR1964Bom843

..... or grave miscarriage of justice, or there is substantial failure of justice which are all aspects of failure of justice, or if the tribunal neglects mandatory provisions, or passes a patently unjust or illegal order by arbitrary procedure, or the order is without jurisdiction or any principles of natural justice are violated. an order is not liable to be set aside .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 1964 (HC)

C.N. Krishna Murthy Vs. Abdul Subban and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-06-1964

Reported in : 1965CriLJ565

..... him and so forth; these go to the foundation of natural justice and would be struck down as illegal forthwith; it hardly matters whether this is because prejudice is then patent or because it is so abhorrent to well-established notions of natural justice that a trial of that kind is only a mockery of a trial and not of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 1964 (HC)

Dasari Satyanarayana, Being Minor Represented by Guardian A. Venkatara ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-07-1964

Reported in : AIR1966AP209

..... would be entitled to a decree, and that meant assisting a party to the fraud and the court would be used as an instrument of fraud, which is clearly and patently inconsistent with public interest. it was observed that there was no question of estoppel in such a case. the learned judges concluded thus (at page 376):'therefore, we are inclined .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 1964 (HC)

Kanodia Brothers Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-19-1964

Reported in : [1965]57ITR765(All)

..... other ground.it is well settled that a writ of prohibition can only be issued if it is a proved to the satisfaction of the court that there is a patent want of jurisdiction on the part of the authority taking the proceedings. in a doubtful or marginal case the writ cannot go. nothing has been shown to us to justify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1964 (HC)

S. B. Singar Singh and Sons Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahab ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-21-1964

Reported in : [1965]58ITR626(All)

..... 9th june, 1956, rejected the application. it is this order which the petitioner, by means of this writ petition filed on 4th november, 1961, seeks to challenge as being one patently erroneous in law, or one where the tribunal failed to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it.two questions, therefore, fall to be considere : one, whether there was, in fact, any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1964 (SC)

New Asiatic Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pessumal Dhanamal Aswani and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1736; (1964)66BOMLR702; 1965MHLJ257(SC); [1964]7SCR867

..... issued to the company in the suits under s. 96(2) of the act to be bad in law and, accordingly, set them aside. 5. the plaintiffs then filed letters patent appeals which were allowed and the chamber summonses were dismissed. it was directed that the trial judge would hear the alternative prayers in the chamber summonses and make the necessary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1964 (SC)

Memon Abdul Karim Haji Tayab Vs. Deputy Custodian General, New Delhi a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-19-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1256; [1964]6SCR837

..... also failed. then followed a writ petition by the appellant before the saurashtra high court in 1955. the writ petition was dismissed by a learned single judge; but on letters patent appeal the appellant succeeded, the high court holding that the amount was not recoverable under s. 48 of the act as it stood at the relevant time. this decision was .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //