Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1964 Page 7 of about 365 results (0.028 seconds)

Mar 04 1964 (SC)

N. Vajrapani Naidu and anr. Vs. the New theatre Carnatic Talkies Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-04-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1440; [1964]6SCR1015

..... court do appoint a commissioner to fix the value of the site based on the market value prevalent on july 28, 1958. an appeal under cl. 15 of the letters patent of the high court against the order of panchapakesa lyer, j., was dis- missed. with certificate granted by the high court of madras, this appeal is preferred by the lessors .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1964 (SC)

C. Channabasavaiah Vs. State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-28-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC1293; [1965]1SCR360

..... it is impossible to sustain their selection. to begin with it was wrong of the high court to allow a compromise of this kind to be effected when it was patently obvious that three candidates had not attended the viva voce test at all and there was nothing before the high court for comparing the remaining thirteen candidates with those who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1964 (HC)

Girdharlal Laljibhai Vs. Nagrashna M.N. and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-08-1964

Reported in : AIR1964Guj231; [1964(8)FLR415]; (1964)0GLR413

..... that the view of the learned judge was a perverse one or such as no reasonable man could take. the order of the learned judge does not therefore, disclose any patent error of law and he has not failed to exercise hie jurisdiction, and no interference with his order is justified at our hands. the petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 1964 (HC)

S. Krishnamurthy Vs. Chief Engineer, Southern Railway, P.T. Madras and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-21-1964

Reported in : AIR1967Mad315; [1966(12)FLR311]; (1966)IILLJ697Mad

..... trial; it might have been lacking in certain features of protection to the delinquent officer. but to argue from this that article 14 is thereby infringed would lead to the patent absurdity that, wherever it is possible to prosecute a government servant in a court of law, the authorities, would be precluded from proceeding against him departmentally, under any conceivable circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1964 (HC)

Kadi Municipality Vs. New Chhotalal Mills Company Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-27-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Guj293

..... with the learned judge that the suit was maintainable against the municipality. (17) in this view of the matter we dismiss all the three letters of patent and confirm the decrees passed by he learned judge in all the three cases with this modification that the declaration and injunction granted under the decrees will be ..... taken even before the learned assistant judge or the learned trial judge. he pointed out the limits of our jurisdiction hearing a letters patent appeal and relied on three decisions of the high court of bombay, namely, shripad v. shivram, 36 bom l r 1052: (air 1934 bom 466), ..... b.g.thakore, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the company. he submitted that this contention could not be allowed to be raised in these letters patent appeals since it had not been taken before the learned judge who heard the second appeals and for the matter of that it had not been ..... and took the view that the suit for refund was maintainable against the municipality, and in this view of the matter, he declared the suit. letters patent appeal no.10 of 1961 is directed against that decree passed by the learned judge.(4) it will be seen from the aforesaid statement of facts that ..... ,being the amount claimed by the municipality and paid by the company under protest, for the period of 3rd december 1952 to 30th december 1952. letters patent appeal no. 10 of 1961, arose out of a third suit filed by the company against the municipality on 4th february 1954 and in the suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1964 (HC)

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Firm Tirath Ram and Sons and a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-01-1964

Reported in : [1966]36CompCas105(P& H)

..... instance.a.n. grover j. 17. i agree.p.c. pandit j. 18. i also agree.final order of division bench 19. this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent has to be dismissed in the light of the answers given by the learned judges of the full bench to the questions referred to them, and, as ordered by d ..... loss as the goods had been lost to them and the insurance corporation was therefore liable. the life insurance corporation then filed an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent which came before two of us and, as the question raised on behalf of the appellant appeared to be sufficiently important, we decided to refer it to a larger bench ..... in section 18(2) and a decree had then to be made in accordance with the decision of that board. against the judgment of the learned single judge, a letters patent appeal has been filed on behalf of the life insurance corporation of india and it is that appeal with which we are now dealing.3. mr. sachar, in support of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1964 (HC)

Phul Kumari Devi Vs. Sambhu Prasad Singh and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-25-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Pat87

..... must be decided in favour of the appellant41. mr. lal narain sinha has, however raised a question of res judicata. learned counsel contends that the effect of dismissal of letters patent appeal no. 120 of 1958, which had been filed by defendants 3 to 7 against the decision of the learned single fudge in f.a. no. 153 of 1951, would ..... this deed is that the remaining co-sharers have relinquished all interest in the properties which was (were) owned and possessed by a particular co-sharer."this view, however, is patently wrong. there is no basis for making an assumption that nanku (plff. no. 1) had some antecedent title in the house. undoubtedly, it was the self-acquired property of amar ..... the three points urged before him in favour of the plaintiffs, and as such having upheld the decree of the trial court, two appeals under clause 10 of the letters patent were preferred against his judgment. the appeal of defendant no. 1, which was numbered as l. p. a. no. 119 of 1998, is the present appeal. the appeal filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 1964 (HC)

Velivelli Sydulu Vs. Guntupalli Venkateswarlu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-22-1964

Reported in : AIR1965AP318

..... learned brother justice seshachalapati, agreeing with the conclusions of the trial court, restored the judgment of that court. the learned judge, however, granted leave under cl. 15 of the letters patent and that is how the matter is before us. (6) the first point that arises for consideration is whether the debt in question is tainted with immorality. it is urged ..... chandra reddy, c.j. (1) this letters patent appeal is filed against the judgment of justice seshachalapati in s. a. no. 575 of 1959 with the learned judge's leave.(2) the facts giving rise to this appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 1964 (HC)

T.M. Abdul Rahim and Co. Vs. Ahmed Basha

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-01-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Mad250

..... the plaintiff's trade mark. in the end, the learned judge dismissed the appeal preferred by the plaintiffs. now it is against this judgment the plaintiffs have preferred this letters patent appeal.(6) in the appeal once again the same arguments were addressed before us by the same counsel who appeared before ganapatia pillai j. the only point that was strenuously ..... (1) this letters patent appeal is preferred by the plaintiff's against the judgment of ganapatia pillai, j., confirming the dismissal their suit for an injunction restraining the defendant and his agents from selling .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1964 (HC)

Village Panchayat of Jangareddigudem Vs. Kommireddy Narasayya

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-28-1964

Reported in : AIR1965AP191

..... was no pleading invoking such relief. in the said view he reversed the decree of the 1st appellate court and dismissed the suit with costs throughout.(10) in the letters patent appeal the said view of krishna rao, j. is challenged, and it is contended by the learned advocate general that the applicant-plaintiff is entitled to relief under section 65 ..... narasimham, j.(1) this is an appeal under the letters patent against the judgment of krishnarao, j. in s. a. no. 158 of 1959 by which he reversed the decree of the lower appellate court and dismissed the suit. the plaintiff - .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //