Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1980 Page 4 of about 422 results (0.010 seconds)

Feb 15 1980 (HC)

The Official Receiver, Coimbatore Vs. S.A. Ramaswami Gounder and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-15-1980

Reported in : AIR1980Mad269

..... other respondent in s. a. 1606 of 1963, which was allowed by this court on 28-4-1977. aggrieved against the said judgment the petitioner purported to file a letters patent appeal before this court on the basis of leave granted by this court while allowing the second appeal. on the office pointing out that the, letters ..... patent appeal is not competent in view of section 100-a, c. p code as amended by central act 104 of 1976, the petitioner realised that he cannot maintain the appeal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1980 (HC)

M. Muthayya Vs. Kamu Alias Kamala Ammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-1980

Reported in : (1981)1MLJ107

..... directing the appellant to serve notice of appeal on the minor-respondent within a week. there was a subsequent petition for restoration of the suit which failed and the letters patent appeal against the dismissal of restoration petition was also dismissed. it was held that the whole appeal had failed for non-joinder of the minor-respondent who was a necessary ..... that if the appellant was then allowed to add the proposed respondent the result would be that the order in the miscellaneous judicial case as well as in the letters patent appeal would become nugatory and the entire proceedings would constitute mere waste of time, and that valuable rights had been acquired by the respondents and that they could not be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1980 (HC)

HarkishIn Lakhimal Gidwani Vs. Achyut Kashinath Wagh and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-1980

Reported in : [1982]52CompCas1(Bom); 1981MhLJ61

..... of quashing of the proceeding is asked for after issuance of process, then, inherent powers may be exercised sparingly with circumspection and in rare cases and that too, to correct patent illegalities.53. in my opinion, therefore, on the premises as regards the interpretation of s. 630 of the act, the issuance of process is manifestly justified and it cannot be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 1980 (HC)

Pitambardas Kalyanji Bakotiya Vs. Dattatraya Krishnaji

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-06-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Bom388; 1981MhLJ290

..... the tenant was aware of the same. the knowledge that construction of kitchen platform would cause damage can be attributed to the petitioner provided the defect in the building was patent and could be seen with naked eve. the construction made by the petitioner was a reasonable use of the property, the premises being leased for the purpose of residence. the ..... it is done with the intention of knowledge that such user would damage the property. the knowledge could be attributed to the lessee provided the defects in the property are patent and not latent. in either of the cases, the damage or waste to the premises could be described as voluntary. neither the fact of the damage nor the evidence that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1980 (HC)

Sudhir Sharma Vs. S.T.A. (T) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-02-1980

Reported in : AIR1980All352

..... is therefore entitled to maintain the petition.13. in view of the above discussion we hold that the state transport authority as well as the appellate tribunal both have committed patent error in upholding the respondents' right to ply their vehicles on the route published under section 68-c of the act.14. we, therefore, allow the petition and quash the ..... not be covered by section 68-f (1-a) consequently the permits granted to private operators did not cease to be effective.7. the appellate tribunal, in our opinion, committed patent error in holding that the corporation had not obtained permits under section 68-f (1-a) of the act for the routes included in the notifications published under section 68 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1980 (SC)

international Tourist Corporation and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-1980

Reported in : AIR1981SC774; (1981)2SCC318; [1981]2SCR364

..... in the light of his holiness kesavananda bharathi sripadagalavaru v. state of kerala [1973] suppl. scr 1 based on the commentary of mr. seeravai was repelled.7. there is a patent fallacy in the submission of shri sorabji. before exclusive legislative competence can be claimed for parliament by resort to the residuary power, the legislative incompetence of the state legislative must ..... a tax is compensatory or not is to enquire whether the trades people are having the use of certain facilities for the better conduct of their business and paying not patently much more than what is required for providing the facilities. it would be impossible to judge the compensatory nature of a tax by a meticulous test, and in the nature .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 1980 (SC)

Moola Vs. Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-1980

Reported in : AIR1981SC1647; 1980Supp(1)SCC608

..... the custodian from the operation of section 9. with this observation, the writ petition of the appellant was dismissed and this order was affirmed by a division bench in letters patent appeal no. 150 of 1979.3. learned counsel for the appellant here pointed out that the appellant's lease is protected under section 12 of the administration of evacuee property ..... the high court.6. we accordingly set aside the judgment of the learned single judge of the high court as well as the decision of the division bench in letters patent appeal and remit the case to the high court with a direction that the writ petition may be re-admitted and the two contentions of the appellant, viz., (i) whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1980 (HC)

P.L. Bhardwaj Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1980

Reported in : (1981)ILLJ501Del

..... dismissal. the suit had succeeded, it was held that the dismissal of the employee was illegal. appeals against the decree in that suit were affirmed right up to the letters patent bench. the supreme court held that the rules allowed the services of the employee to be terminated in two ways. either the service could be terminated for misconduct of it ..... civil writ no. 711 of 1970, which was decided by judgment dated 3rd may, 1971, against the petitioner. the unsuccessful petitioner has then appealed under clause 10 of the letters patent. the appeal was filled on 12th july, 1970, immediately after the re-opening of the high court after vacations, so it is within time. 2. the rule under which the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 1980 (HC)

New India Industrial Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-16-1980

Reported in : AIR1980Delhi277; ILR1980Delhi940

..... and trade is a salutary practice in administrative law. the present- case vividly illustrates the seif-defeating consequences of non-consultation. the result is that a well meaning control order, patently in the interest of the general public, cannot be implemented. consultation^ of interest infuses law making process with democratic norms particularly in what is called bureaucratic legislation. apart from this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 1980 (HC)

Ganesh Anand Chela Vs. Swami Divyanand

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-29-1980

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1036; 17(1980)DLT492; 1980RLR265

..... complaint which i have noted above. the complainant's allegation appears to be that the four specific instances given in sub-paras (a) to (d) of the said para 'are patent falsehood done with malice and makes the dharam and guru and his chelas including the complainant a subject of contempt and ridicule,...........'. the learned magistrate, while keeping .in view the ..... in order to defame the guru and his dharam he has done many acts by mouth and in writing and some of them are detailed as under as they are patent falsehood done with malice and makes the dharam and guru and his chelas including the complainant a subject of contempt and ridicule amongst the sanyasis as well as among the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //