Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1980 Page 5 of about 422 results (0.008 seconds)

Aug 25 1980 (HC)

Jayantilal Bhogilal Desai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-ii

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-25-1980

Reported in : (1981)22CTR(Guj)186; [1981]130ITR655(Guj)

..... capital gains are assessable in the case of transfer of goodwill, the indian act did not have it in contemplation, when enacting section 12b, that self-created assets like copyright, patents and goodwill should be subjected to capital gains arising on their transfer and hence capital gains on the transfer of a goodwill are not liable to be taxed under section ..... to pay tax on capital gains and profits under s. 41 (2) on different items sold by him under the aforesaid two documents in question, even then, the tribunal was patently in error when it held that rs. 13,000 were liable to be taxed by way of profit on sale of stock. 8. mr. divatia further contended that, in any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1980 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-07-1980

Reported in : 1980WLN447

..... preventive stringent legislation.8. the provision regarding anticipatory bail under section 438 cr. p.c. were intended for use very sparingly in the exceptional cases, where mala fide design is patent and not even latent. such provisions cannot be used for circumventing normal procedure of arrest and investigation after arrest. unless the accused shows that he has strong case where arrest .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1980 (HC)

Tejpal Singh Vs. Hardit Singh, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-07-1980

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT295

..... , shri sorabjee contends that the said full bench judgment is wrong and reads to be reconsidered so that his appeal may be entertainable under the relevant clause of the letters patent. this bench, however, in smt. shanta sabharwal v. smt. sushila sabharwal, : air1979delhi153 , has already held that the judgment of the full bench does not require reconsideration and also it is ..... from orders made by a judge of this court in exercise of the original civil jurisdiction would lie only under the code of civil procedure and not under the letters patent. (16) for the above reasons, the appeal is dismissed in liming as being not maintainable under rule 103 in view of rule 102 of order 21 of the code. sd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1980 (HC)

Dr. Miss Bhavna P. Patel and ors. Vs. the Dean, Govt., Medical College ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-26-1980

Reported in : (1981)22GLR13

..... cause for the respondents to reshuffle the merit list which was prepared as per annex. e and consequently the reshuffled list at annex. g is completely misconceived and involves a patent error of law on the part of the 1st respondent who has tried to artificially read dichotomy in the uniform pattern of examination conducted by baroda university when in fact ..... and 4 in issuing the notice at annex. d does not get support from the judgment of this court in dr. vachharajani's case and consequently, the said action is patently bad.9. that takes us to the consideration of the second contention of mr. tanna for the petitioners. he contended that the university of baroda is the sole authority to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 1980 (HC)

Parle Products Private Limited Vs. C.S. Saraswati and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-09-1980

Reported in : [1981(43)FLR122]; (1981)IILLJ419Bom; 1981MhLJ646

..... only that victimisation was not proved but that it could not be said that the order had not been passed in good faith or that it had been made for patently false reasons. with regard to the misconduct, the tribunal held that it could not be said that the ('offence') alleged against the workman was of trivial nature and the punishment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 1980 (HC)

Tejoomal Lakhmichand Vs. M.J. Talegaonkar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-1980

Reported in : AIR1980Bom369

..... promised or of money or other thing of value to be rendered periodically or on specified occasions to the transferor by the transferee, who accepts the transfer on such terms, patently, a lease is a contract whereunder the transferee accepts certain obligations. the transferee, or lessee or tenant, must, therefore, be one who is capable of contracting. an unregistered association is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1980 (HC)

Road Transport Corporation and ors. Vs. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-10-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Bom299; (1981)83BOMLR173; 1981MhLJ855

..... having territorial jurisdiction in respect of the subject matter in dispute.47. our attention was also drawn to the latest pronouncement of lord denning m.r. reported in levision v. patent steam carpet cleaning co. ltd. (1977) 3 all er 498. the contention of shri kotwal is that if the limiting clause excluding exemption clause was unreasonable then it should not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1980 (HC)

Bajji Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-05-1980

Reported in : 1981CriLJ1558

..... him and so forth.these go to the foundations of natural justice and would be struck down as illegal forthwith. it hardly matters whether this is because prejudice is then patent or because it is so abhorrent to well-established notions of natural justice that a trial of that kind is only a mockery of a trial and not of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1980 (SC)

Rajamallaiah and anr. Vs. Anil Kishore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-1980

Reported in : AIR1980SC1502; 1980Supp(1)SCC81; [1980]3SCR794; 1980(12)LC583(SC)

..... held within a period of 15 days.5. the present appellants and some others, as well as the state of andhra pradesh preferred appeals under clause 15 of the letters patent. the appellate bench consisting of kuppuswamy and p. a. chaudhary, jj., did not agree with amareswari j's view that the auction was contrary to rule 12 read with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1980 (SC)

Rajamalliah and anr. Vs. Anil Kishore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-04-1980

Reported in : AIR1980SC2037; 1980Supp(1)SCC226; 1980(12)LC813(SC)

..... held on 21st and 22nd september, 1979 and directing that a reauction should be held within fifteen days. appeals preferred to a division bench under clause 15 of the letters patent by the government of andhra pradesh and the successful bidders at the auction were dismissed, further appeals preferred to this court under article 136 of the constitution by the government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //