Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1980 Page 7 of about 422 results (0.010 seconds)

Feb 22 1980 (HC)

Sher Khan Vs. Bambhu and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-22-1980

Reported in : 1980WLN465

..... any matter, is arising under the act, a remedy by way of appeal or otherwise is provided, then the jurisdiction of the civil court is barred. therefore, it is so patent in the facts and circumstances of this case that the order of the assistant collector dated 22.4.75 was an appealable order and the appeal was filed and, therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-ii Vs. Seshasayee Bros. P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-16-1980

Reported in : (1981)20CTR(Mad)299; [1981]127ITR218(Mad)

..... sought the question that has been referred. 3. among the objects of the company as seen from the memorandum were the following : '3. (1) to purchase or otherwise acquire any patents, brevets and inventions, licences, concessions and the like conferring any exclusive or non-exclusive or limited right to use any invention or privilege, which may seem capable of being used .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Tamil Nadu-v Vs. Kamala Ganapathi Subraman ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-23-1980

Reported in : (1980)19CTR(Mad)209; [1981]127ITR175(Mad)

..... it was observed by the supreme court : 'prima facie it may appear somewhat strange that an order which was good and valid when it was made should be treated as patently invalid and wrong by virtue of the retrospective operation of the amendment act. but such a result is necessarily involved in the legal fiction about the retrospective operation of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1980 (HC)

Somarajan and ors. Vs. Management of A.R.C. Engineering Works, Ambattu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-1980

Reported in : (1981)IILLJ25Mad

..... )iillj58mad , the learned judge observed as follows : 'these observations are clearly applicable to the facts of the present case. we may further observe that in the present case, it is patent on the fact of the report of the enquiry officer as well as the impugned order of punishment, that the petitioner management did no awarding the punishment, take any account .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1980 (HC)

R.S.K. Chandrasekaran Vs. the Official Receiver, Madurai and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Mad235

..... and for consideration, and that therefore that question did not arise. it is the correct ness of this conclusion of the learned judge that is canvassed in the present letters patent appeal.3. section 38(2) of the provincial in solvency act provides for the vesting of the property in the official receiver on the making of an order of adjudication .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1980 (HC)

L.M.L.L. Lakshmanan Chettiar Vs. V.A.R. Alagappa Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Mad338

..... properties covered by them etc., and about the mortgage being subsisting. we are clearly of opinion that the view taken by the subordinate judge on the question of limitation is patently wrong and manifestly opposed to law. the subordinate judge has failed to see that with the creation of the equitable mortgage the debt became a secured one and the two .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1980 (HC)

L.R.M.L.L. Lakshmanan Chettiar Vs. V.Ar. Alagappa Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-1980

Reported in : (1981)1MLJ232

..... properties covered by them etc., and about the mortgage being subsisting. we are clearly of opinion that the view taken by the subordinate judge on the question of limitation is patently wrong and manifestly opposed to law. the subordinate judge has failed to see that with the creation of the equitable mortgage the debt became a secured one and the two .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 1980 (HC)

Smt. Kamla Devi Vs. Balbir Singh

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Nov-18-1980

Reported in : AIR1981J&K70

..... person or public company is enabled to do acts or enjoy privileges which he or it could not do or enjoy without such authority". accordingly the letters patent is an executive enactment and not a legislative enactment. the decision in the case of benoari lal sarma v. empreor (air 1943 cal 285) (sb ..... that by an executive enactment the then ruler could amend or override the provisions of 1996 act. the question that necessarily arises is whether the letters patent is an executive enactment or a legislative enactment? if the answer be that it is a legislative enactment, then, there can be no doubt that ..... before a bench of two judges for preliminary hearing." 13. rule 49 reads thus : "an application for a certificate under clause 12 of the letters patent in the case of the judgment of a single judge deciding a second appeal shall be made orally before him immediately after the judgment is delivered. no ..... of sub-section (3) of section 60 within the meaning of section 102 of the constitution. there can be no manner of doubt that the letters patent (jammu and kashmir) are "law for the time being in force" within the meaning of section 102, for they clearly fall within the definition of ..... taken from it was also dismissed by a learned single judge of this court. the appellant then filed an appeal under clause 12 of the letters patent against the judgment of the learned single judge. an objection was taken on behalf of the respondent that the learned single judge not having declared the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1980 (HC)

Brij Mohan Vs. the Chief Administrator, Union Territory, Chandigarh an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-19-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H236

..... section 8-a of the act as also the one passed under section 5 of the eviction act, within one month from today.26. as regards letters patent appeal no, 102 of 1977, the matter is remanded to the learned single judge to decide civil writ petition no. 1419 of 1974 on merits in ..... any consideration of the point in depth. with respect, i hold that in neither of these cases, the law is correctly laid down.24. in letters patent appeal no. 101 of 1977, the tenant-appellant's success in getting a finding that a lessee is not only entitled to be heard before an order ..... at order is passed.20. that the estate officer was alive to the right of a lessee to be heard is apparent from the fact that in letters patent appeal no. 101 of 1977 arising from civil writ petition no. 1452 of 1974 (brij mohan v. the chief administrator, union territory, chandigarh and others), ..... but his appeal was dismissed by the chief administrator, chandigarh, vide his order dated l5th april, 1974, annexure p-3. again unlike the appellant-tenant in letters patent appeal no. 101 of 1977, the appellant-tenant herein had availed his right of appeal against the order, annexure p-4, passed against him on 19th march, 1974 ..... 10 of the act.2. before proceeding to consider the proposition posed above, it may be useful to have a few facts relevant to each letters patent appeal. in letters patent appeal no. 101 of 1977, the appellant tenant too was furnished with a copy of the show-cause notice sent to his landlord. faqir chand, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 1980 (HC)

Karadia Jetha Kana, Etc. Vs. Managing Officer-cum-collector and Settle ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-02-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Guj27; (1981)0GLR239

..... by art. 226 of the constitution. since they were original proceedings decided by the learned single judge, an appeal against his orders is competent under clause 15 of the letters patent. the first objection which has been raised by mr. hathi, therefore, fails and is rejected. paras 6-10 [ xx xx xx xx xx xx xx]11. there is one more ..... third party. in fact, in the instant case, there were no two parties at all. therefore, there was no lis. therefore, within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent, we are unable to hold that the chief settlement commissioner exercised revisional jurisdiction of a quasi judicial character. in that view of the matter the writ petitions which the petitioners ..... contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners and dismissed both the petitions. 2. those orders are challenged by the original petitioners in these appeals under clause 15 of the letters patent. 3. the first contention which mr. hathi has raised relates to the maintainability of these appeals. according to him, the orders made by the chief settlement commissioner were quasi judicial ..... common order recorded by mr. justice j. b. mehta in special civil application no. 952 of 1974 and special civil application no. 1060 of 1974. the material facts in letters patent appeal no. 160 of 1977 are as follows. survey nos. 226 and 121/3 of village lathodara in- mangrol taluka of junagadh district were received by the original petitioner from .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //