Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1980 Page 9 of about 422 results (0.012 seconds)

Sep 05 1980 (HC)

S. Jagjit Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-05-1980

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi1139

..... . he has compared these powers with the powers of a private landlord under the transfer of property act. we feel that this approach and interpretation of the learned judge is patently erroneous. section 19 expressly states that these provisions were subject to the rules framed under the act. besides requirement of show cause notice is also provided in sub-sections 2 ..... fails to show cause or does not give satisfactory reply a cancellation order should be passed. such an order should be speaking order recording the reasons. unless a demand for patent is made and an opportunity is given to make payment a person cannot be said to be in default. in this case, no such opportunity of making payment was given .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1980 (HC)

Raj Chopra Vs. Shanno Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-26-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Delhi18; 17(1980)DLT546; 1980RLR431

..... good reasons for it. but the lt. governor by holding that he had no power to do refused to exercise his jurisdiction vested in him and thus committed an error patent on the face of record and the learned judge was right in quashing the said order. (11) as a result we find no merit in the appeal and we dismiss ..... r. sachar, j.(1) this is a letters patent appeal against the order of the learned single judge dated 31.5.1974 which he allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent no. 1 and remitted the matter back .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1980 (HC)

Smt. Ashalata Dey and ors. Vs. Kamal Kumar Bose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-26-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Cal36

..... . such an objection is now being sought to be raised at a very belated stage when we started hearing the two cross-appeals filed under clause 15 of the letters patent. the defendant states that he wants to raise such an objection in view of the decision of the supreme court in the case of maulavi abdur rub firoze ahmed & co ..... the conclusion that it would not be just and proper for us to allow the defendant to raise such an objection so late and at this stage of the letters patent appeal. in substance, the objection now sought to be raised is that the suit .had not been properly valued by the plaintiff when he valued the suit at rs. 1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 1980 (HC)

C. Ramaiah Vs. Mohammadunnisa Begum

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-13-1980

Reported in : AIR1981AP38

chennakesav reddy, j.1. this appeal by the defendant under clause 15 of the letters patent is directed against the affirming judgment of our learned brother m. ramachandra raju, j., in c.c.c.a. no. 183 of 1975 preferred against the decree of second additional .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1980 (HC)

Mohinder Singh Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-19-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H282

d.s. tewatia, j.1. the sole question that falls for determination in this letters patent appeal is as to whether the action of the estate officer, union territory, chandigarh, respondent no. 2, in resuming the site in question on which house no. 1515 at sector .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1980 (HC)

Haryana State Electricity Board Vs. Smt. Pushpa Chadha and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-10-1980

Reported in : [1984]55CompCas421(P& H)

1. this is an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent filed by theharyana state electricity board against the judgment dated the 21st of february, 1980, passed by the learned single judge of this court. 2. the learned single judge allowed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1980 (HC)

Hotel Rajdoot Pvt. Ltd. Vs. B Municipal Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-19-1980

Reported in : AIR1980Delhi262; 18(1980)DLT1

b.n. kirpal, j.(1) the two questions which arise for consideration in this letters patent appeal are (1) as to what wouldamount to the refusal to grant permission as envisaged by the provisoto sub-section (2) of section 346 of the delhi municipal corporationact, 1957 ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 1980 (HC)

NooruddIn and ors. Vs. Naubat Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-06-1980

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi1161

avadh behari rohatgi, j.(1) this is a letters patent appeal from the order of a learned single judge dated march 3, 1972. (2) these are the facts. on may 13, 1964, chaudhary naubat singh, the plaintiff (the present respondent) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 1980 (HC)

Gubaksh Singh Vs. Dhanni Devi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-13-1980

Reported in : 1980RLR397

d.k. kapur, j.(1) the present appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent arises from a claim for compensation made by the legal representatives of one gokal ram on account of an accident that occurred on 25th march, 1964. the commissioner acting under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1980 (HC)

Prem Nath Motors Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-1980

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT111; [1980(41)FLR338]

yogeshwar dayal, j. (1) this is an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against the judgment of the learned single judge dated 4th november, 1970 passed in g. w. 647-dofl966 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant under article 226 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //