Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1986 Page 2 of about 424 results (0.008 seconds)

Aug 22 1986 (HC)

Narotamdas Trikamdas Toprani Vs. Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. L ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-22-1986

Reported in : (1986)88BOMLR649; [1990]68CompCas300(Bom)

..... lower margin as the trustees may agree, on the security comprising the net (depreciated) book value of the then existing fixed assets (excluding motor cars, vehicles, furniture and fixtures, goodwill, patents, etc.) of the company and the company doth hereby agree and undertake that in case, for any reason, such net (depreciated) fixed assets cover falls below 40% or such lower .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1986 (HC)

Albright Morarji and Pandit Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-12-1986

Reported in : [1987]166ITR583(Bom)

..... english company which was entered into on november 10, 1966, and the specifically provides that the petitioner shall, during the continuance of the agreement and, thereafter, not disclose the un patented information disclosed to it by the english company by virtue, or as a result, of the implementation of the agreement. the petitioner was required to ensure that the information received ..... -months, provided however that the number of such technicians at any time shall not be more than three. clause 8 of the agreement permits hindustan lever limited to use relevant patents of the petitioner connected with the process/technical information used in the manufacture of the product, while clause 9.03 grants permission to hindustan lever limited to use drawings and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 1986 (HC)

Shipyard Technical Staff Assn. and Others Vs. Mazgaon Docks Ltd. and A ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-1986

Reported in : (1987)IILLJ266Bom

..... provides that in case the company acquires the patent as exclusive privilege it would be for a consideration fixed by the managing director. having regard to the limited class of inventions covered by this ..... unreasonable in requiring the officer to obtain the previous consent of the competent authority in regard to an application for a patent or exclusive privilege in respect of such invention or in requiring him to permit its use by the company free of charge. the rule also ..... company may take over such patent or exclusive privilege for such consideration as the managing director may fix.14. the phraseology employed in this rule leaves no doubt that it is ..... to adopt and use it without being obliged to pay any royalty or other consideration therefor. the officer may not assign, charge or transfer the patent or exclusive privilege without the previous consent in writing of the competent authority and without providing it for use by the company free of charge. the ..... meant to apply only to patents or exclusive privileges in respect of inventions made on the basis of knowledge or experience gained in the service of the company. there is nothing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1986 (HC)

The Singer Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-1986

Reported in : AIR1986Bom286; 1986MhLJ280

..... hearing was given to the petitioners by the then deputy secretary.4. identical letters dt. 19th feb. 1979 addressed to the petitioners' trade marks attorneys by the controller general of patents, designs and trade marks said thus :'with reference to the above matter, i have to state that the central government have carefully considered all the material in connection with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1986 (HC)

C.M. Parikh and ors. Vs. V.M. Mehta and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-01-1986

Reported in : (1987)1GLR362

..... respondent r.m. adalja in the seniority list of superintendents (now section officers). further promotions of the appellants in the aforesaid three appeals, being letters patent appeals nos. 77, 95 and 96 of 1979 shall be given on the basis of their re-fixed seniority as aforesaid; and they shall be ..... , he shall be placed above his immediate junior respondent r.m. adalja in the seniority list of senior assistants and assistants. appellant in said letters patent appeal no. 77 of 1979 shall be deemed to have been promoted to the cadre of superintendents from the date on which his immediate junior respondent ..... in 1964. they were then promoted to the posts of superintendents. it is, therefore, obvious that these appellants are junior to the appellants in letters patent appeals nos. 77, 95 and 96 of 1979 in the cadre of assistants. we agree with the reasoning and conclusions reached by the learned single ..... which we shall have to consider while examining the submissions of the petitioners.25. mr. b.r. shah, learned advocate for the appellants-petitioners in letters patent appeals nos. 95 of 1979 and 96 of 1973, has raised the following contentions which are also adopted by mr. n. j. mehta, learned ..... at an appropriate stage.14. in order to appreciate the contentions raised by the appellants, it is necessary to refer the facts in brief from letters patent appeal no. 95 of 1979 (in special civil application no. 1996 of 1974). in that petition shri v.m. mehta, the petitioner, was recruited .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 1986 (HC)

Khotani Construction Co., Vs. Anwar Haji Alimohammed Cassum and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-1986

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR454

..... case any further. (h) but even after every provision of procedural law is assumed to be in favour of misquitta, the question of the almost patent fraud committed by him still remains. further, there are indications that responsible officer of this court has played mischievous and apparently collusive part in the ..... played by mr. pai as the receiver's representative of making a virtual donation of these lands to misquitta on a platter by admitting the patently fraudulent claim of misquitta before the tenancy court. all this smacks of fraud and collusion not to mention breach of trust. neither plaintiff no. ..... by the receiver's office as also about the noticeable connivance indulged in by each of the mamlatdars trying the particular tenancy proceedings at the patent fraud practised by the manifestly mischievous misquitta in connection with each of the tenancy proceedings referred to above. secondly, it is possible that plaintiff ..... managing the property and for whom he was in the position of a constructive trustee. whatever it may be, only one of the two patent illegalities was brought to the notice of the appellate authority. misquitta had no answer to the same. the result was that the appeal was ..... and a farce-drama was enacted of having effected service of the notice of the tenancy application upon the dead person. it was in this patently fraudulent manner that an order was obtained by misquitta against the receiver alone behind the back of the present plaintiffs and that too in spite .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1986 (HC)

Shamsher Singh Vs. the Commissioner, Jullundur Division, Jullundur and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-05-1986

Reported in : AIR1989P& H51

..... default prior to the amendment. on this view of the matter, the learned single judge dismissed the writ petition. that is how the matter is before us in this letters patent appeal. 5. the land of the appellant had been auctioned on june 26, 1970. the collection of land revenue and embezzlement thereof, its claimed by the revenue authorities, had taken ..... sukhdev singh kang, j. 1. the challenge in this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated january 6, 1982, of a learned single judge of this court dismissing the writ petition (c.w.p. no. 2469 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1986 (HC)

Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. Lajwanti Chemicals and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-14-1986

Reported in : AIR1986P& H350

..... the high court can be moved to act under this article when there has been a flagrant abuse of the elementary principles of justice or a manifest error of law patent on the face of the record or an outrageous miscarriage of justice. but the high court will not be justified in converting itself into a court of appeal and subverting ..... suit has been decided in favour of the applicant, but through oversight the decree has not been passed by the trial court in terms of o. 34. the mistake is patent on the record and this court can rectify such a mistake under art. 227. he further contends that in the said circumstances the appeal be treated as a petition under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1986 (HC)

Union Bank of India Vs. Sunpac Corporation and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-06-1986

Reported in : AIR1986Bom353; (1986)88BOMLR148; 1986MhLJ237

..... followed so far, the office refuses to admit the plaint since the plaintiff before presenting the plaint had not obtained leave of the court under cl. 12 of the letters patent and insists upon returning the plaint to the plaintiff for fresh presentation after obtaining the said leave.2. there is no dispute that for filing the suit in question in ..... suits. one of the defects can be the absence of leave of the court to institute the suit where it is necessary including leave under cl. 12 of the letters patent. so long therefore as the plaint is not admitted and entered in the register of suits all defects including that of the absence of leave under the said clause can ..... be made to : air1934bom91 ramgopal chunilal v. ramsarup baldevdas.6. hence i direct the office not to return the plaint for want of leave under cl. 12 of the letters patent but only require the plaintiff to obtain the leave and admit it to the register when the leave is obtained. order accordingly.

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1986 (HC)

Bansi Lal and anr. Vs. the Principal, Regional Engineering College, Ku ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-28-1986

Reported in : AIR1986P& H274

..... that situation his nomination would be regularised. it may be submitted here that one of the students has in fact left the course before 30th september, 1985.'it is thus patent in the light of the stand of the college authorities itself that radhesh gupta has not been admitted on merit or in accordance with the rules and conditions governing the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //