Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1986 Page 4 of about 424 results (0.009 seconds)

Jul 15 1986 (HC)

Dandapani Naik Vs. State of Orissa Represented by the Collector and an ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-15-1986

Reported in : 1986(II)OLR391

..... , on the basis of findings recorded by the courts below, can ultimately decide the question of adverse possession.8. on consideration of the averments made in the plaint it is patent from paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 that the plaintiff has asserted his possession of the suit land, as well as, acquisition of the right of an occupancy raiyat in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1986 (HC)

Ramesh Samal and ors. Vs. Chabi Mandal and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-05-1986

Reported in : 63(1987)CLT204; 1987CriLJ759

..... 'interlocutory order' is a term of well-knowti legal significance and does not present any serious difficulty. it has been used in various statutes including the civil p.c., letters patent of the high courts and other like statutes. in webster's new world dictionary 'interlocutory' has been defined as an order other than final decision. decided cases have laid down .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 1986 (SC)

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Calcutta Vs. Mrs. O.M.M. Kinnison (Dead), ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-1986

Reported in : AIR1986SC2019; [1986]161ITR824(SC); 1986(2)SCALE355; (1986)4SCC297; [1986]3SCR674

..... the assessee was entitled to on the valuation dates was the right to have the trust administered and, as the high court has observed, having regard to the several considerations patent in this case that the settlement was an english settlement created by an englishman who was resident in england, that it was an english will proved in england and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1986 (SC)

Girdhari Lal and Sons Vs. Balbir Nath Mathur and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-26-1986

Reported in : AIR1986SC1499; 1986(1)SCALE272; (1986)2SCC237; [1986]1SCR383

..... from the rule that plain words should be interpreted according to their plain meaning. there need be no neek and mute submission to the plainness of the language. to avoid patent injustice, anomaly or absurdity or to avoid invalidation of a law, the court would be well justified in departing from the so-called golden rule of construction so as to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1986 (HC)

Damodharan Vs. Meera

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Ker78

..... plain reading of section 24 of the act would clearly show that wife or husband alone can claim maintenance pendente lite and expenses of the proceedings and hence it is patent that the order of the court allowing maintenance to the children is wholly unjustified. counsel relied on air 1981 j & k 5 (puran chand v. kamla devi) and air 1982 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1986 (HC)

R.S.E.B., Vidyut Bhawan Vs. the Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd., New Delh ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-18-1986

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN191

..... its jurisdiction or the case is one in which the court ought to have exercised the jurisdiction or further that in exercising the jurisdiction the court has acted illegally in patent breach of some provision of law or with material irregularity by committing error of procedure. the question in the instant case about entertaining the revision is regarding admission of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 1986 (HC)

Chandra Prakash and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-25-1986

Reported in : 1986(2)WLN710

..... investigating officer ought to have been accepted by the learned special judge. this was in a case where cognizance should not have been taken by the court when there was patent breach of the procedure laid down for obtaining the samples.6. the result of the aforesaid discussions is that this application is allowed, order, dated april 10, 1985 taking cognizance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1986 (HC)

Santosh Rani and anr. and the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sheela ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-03-1986

Reported in : I(1987)ACC134

..... it and has cancelled the policy its liability would continue inspite of the transfer.22. since the principles of law on this branch of insurance company's liability are very patent i would not like to deal them in details. it would be suffice to mention that the liability would subsist irrespective of the transfer, since it is an admitted that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1986 (HC)

S.V. Motwani Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-20-1986

Reported in : ILR1986Delhi108; 1988LabIC126

..... life in vrindaban. two more years went by, during which he showed no intention whatsoever to question his reversion or even his compulsory retirement. (32) the judgment in the letters patent appeal filed by mr. c. p. govil was delivered on 17th february 1965. mr. motwani took yet another year and a half to file his petition in july 1966. for ..... respect of the charges against all these various officers was recorded. he submitted one consolidated report. (28) as i have mentioned already, mr. govil was ultimately successful in a letters patent appeal, decided by the circuit bench of the punjab high court at delhi, in having his dismissal quashed on the ground that the inquiry officer had misconducted the proceedings by ..... 1963, the judge held that the compulsory retirement of mr. motwani was valid. (19) against that judgment, mr. motwani has filed this present appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent. the points taken in the appeal are the same as those which were canvassed before the single judge. (20) whilst this appeal was pending, mr. motwani died on 7th august ..... circuit bench of the punjab high court at delhi. this petition was dismissed by a single judge on 25th march 1964. mr. govil appealed against that judgment under the letters patent. his appeal was allowed on the ground that the inquiry officer had misconducted the proceedings by violating the rules of natural justice, and his dismissal was quashed. the judgment in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1986 (HC)

BashiruddIn Khwaja MohiuddIn Vs. Binraj Murlidhar Shop at Malkapur and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-02-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Bom235; 1986(3)BomCR590; 1987MhLJ30

..... applications for amendment were rejected and shit dismissed. dismissal was confirmed up to stage of second appeal. however, the amendmants came to be allowed by this court in a letters patent appeal and matter remended for fresh enquiry (l. p. a. no. 4 of 1947 decided on 13 the march 1952).3. the trialcourt after remand held ...... issues in favour of ..... v.a. mohta, j.1. by this letters patent appealunder the provisions of civil p, c, before amendment of 1976, the judgment of the learned single judge dated 14th/21st july 1967 confirming the judgment and decree of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //