Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1999 Page 10 of about 1,031 results (0.010 seconds)

Sep 17 1999 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dinanath Agrawalla and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-17-1999

Reported in : 2000ACJ525; AIR2000Ori40

..... in a case where that liability other than a statutory liability is not covered by the policy of insurance? 2. the matter was under consideration in an appeal under letters patent arising out of an appeal against order of a learned single judge dealing with scope and ambit of section 92-a of the motor vehicles act, 1939 (in short, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1999 (HC)

Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rabi Sahoo and anr ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-13-1999

Reported in : 2001ACJ538; 90(2000)CLT8

..... valid driving licence authorising him to drive a transport vehicle, that is to say, a tractor attached with trolley, on the date of accident and evidently there has been a patent breach of the condition of the policy. in such view of the matter, the insurance company could not have been made liable to pay the amount.11. the learned counsel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1999 (HC)

Sharanjit Singh Vs. Satwant Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-07-1999

Reported in : I(2001)DMC139

..... between the two unwilling partners to the marriage, whose marriage has irretrievably broken down and has become a persistent irritant to their day-to-day life. all these ingredients are patently satisfied in this case, it must be noticed at this stage that various attempts for reconciliation were made by this court but parties insisted upon dissolution of marriage rather than .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1999 (HC)

Smt. Darshana Kumari Vs. Smt. Satya Wati

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-22-1999

Reported in : (2000)124PLR173

..... petitioner and shri ravinder chopra, counsel for the respondents and am of the opinion that the procedure adopted by the courts below is totally wrong. the trial court committed a patent illegality when it disposed of the objections like a suit. the case set up by satya wati and her son in their petition under section 372 of the act was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1999 (HC)

Mrs. Renu Dhir Vs. Smt. Gurcharanjit Kaur Walia

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-09-1999

Reported in : (1999)121PLR626

..... affidavit. but every stamp vendor is not supposed to know each person who comes to purchase the stamp paper. the learned rent controller as well as the appellate authority were patently in error in magnifying that the stamp vendor did not know the respondent. the important fact is that the stamp paper was purchased by the respondent. having purchased, it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1999 (SC)

Haridas Parsedia Vs. Urmila Shakya and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-19-1999

Reported in : AIR2000SC278; [2000(84)FLR283]; JT1999(9)SC152; 1999(7)SCALE152; (2000)1SCC81; [1999]Supp4SCR476; 2000(1)SLJ212(SC)

..... after passing such departmental examination, all of them will be absorbed in some higher cadre of transport sub-inspector along with general category candidates. secondly, in our view it is patently erroneous to hold that the decision of the government for relaxation of passing marks for sc/st departmental candidates at the departmental examination can be applicable only when in such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 1999 (SC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bhaskar Picture Palace

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-1999

Reported in : JT1999(10)SC563; (1999)9SCC232

..... application had, therefore, been rejected not only under sub-section (1-a) but also under sub-section (1). the submission has only to be stated to be rejected. it is patent from para 7.1, which we have quoted, that the only reason for not proceeding with the applications was the objection raised by the commissioner under sub-section (1-a .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1999 (HC)

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-05-1999

Reported in : 1999(51)DRJ449

..... , by another notification fication the word 'reinvestigation' was substituted by the words 'further investigation'. the supreme court held that withdrawal of consent by the state government was mala fide and patently invalid. in the circumstances, it also held that the state government was not entitled to further investigate the matter. in the fact situation of that case the supreme court held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1999 (HC)

Basic Tele Services Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-05-1999

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)316; AIR2000Delhi1; [2000]101CompCas132(Delhi); 82(1999)DLT224; 1999(51)DRJ655

..... make payment under the laid guarantee as the invocation was inter alias contrary to the terms of the guarantee itself. the said letter of invocation dated october 19, 1996 is patently bad in law and liable to be set aside. the impugned bank guarantee is a conditional guarantee which can be invoked only in the circumstances provided therein. neither the draft .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1999 (HC)

Santosh Kumar Gupta Vs. State (Nct Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-05-1999

Reported in : 81(1999)DLT71

..... sessions judge had no jurisdiction to invoke the provision of sections 319, cr.p.c. i am, thereforee, constrained to observe that the learned additional sessions judge has committed a patent illegality in directing issuance of summons to the petitioner under section 319, cr.p.c. which has resulted in miscarriage of justice. consequently, the impugned order cannot be allowed to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //