Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1999 Page 10 of about 1,031 results (0.027 seconds)

Feb 09 1999 (HC)

Mrs. Renu Dhir Vs. Smt. Gurcharanjit Kaur Walia

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-09-1999

Reported in : (1999)121PLR626

..... affidavit. but every stamp vendor is not supposed to know each person who comes to purchase the stamp paper. the learned rent controller as well as the appellate authority were patently in error in magnifying that the stamp vendor did not know the respondent. the important fact is that the stamp paper was purchased by the respondent. having purchased, it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1999 (SC)

Haridas Parsedia Vs. Urmila Shakya and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-19-1999

Reported in : AIR2000SC278; [2000(84)FLR283]; JT1999(9)SC152; 1999(7)SCALE152; (2000)1SCC81; [1999]Supp4SCR476; 2000(1)SLJ212(SC)

..... after passing such departmental examination, all of them will be absorbed in some higher cadre of transport sub-inspector along with general category candidates. secondly, in our view it is patently erroneous to hold that the decision of the government for relaxation of passing marks for sc/st departmental candidates at the departmental examination can be applicable only when in such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 1999 (SC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bhaskar Picture Palace

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-1999

Reported in : JT1999(10)SC563; (1999)9SCC232

..... application had, therefore, been rejected not only under sub-section (1-a) but also under sub-section (1). the submission has only to be stated to be rejected. it is patent from para 7.1, which we have quoted, that the only reason for not proceeding with the applications was the objection raised by the commissioner under sub-section (1-a .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1999 (HC)

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-05-1999

Reported in : 1999(51)DRJ449

..... , by another notification fication the word 'reinvestigation' was substituted by the words 'further investigation'. the supreme court held that withdrawal of consent by the state government was mala fide and patently invalid. in the circumstances, it also held that the state government was not entitled to further investigate the matter. in the fact situation of that case the supreme court held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1999 (HC)

Basic Tele Services Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-05-1999

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)316; AIR2000Delhi1; [2000]101CompCas132(Delhi); 82(1999)DLT224; 1999(51)DRJ655

..... make payment under the laid guarantee as the invocation was inter alias contrary to the terms of the guarantee itself. the said letter of invocation dated october 19, 1996 is patently bad in law and liable to be set aside. the impugned bank guarantee is a conditional guarantee which can be invoked only in the circumstances provided therein. neither the draft .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1999 (HC)

Santosh Kumar Gupta Vs. State (Nct Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-05-1999

Reported in : 81(1999)DLT71

..... sessions judge had no jurisdiction to invoke the provision of sections 319, cr.p.c. i am, thereforee, constrained to observe that the learned additional sessions judge has committed a patent illegality in directing issuance of summons to the petitioner under section 319, cr.p.c. which has resulted in miscarriage of justice. consequently, the impugned order cannot be allowed to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1999 (HC)

S. Mohammed Iqubal Vs. M. Padmanabhan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-30-1999

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC116; (1999)3MLJ330

..... the rent control appellate authority has rejected the claim of the landlord requiring the premises for his additional accommodation under section 10(3)(c) of the act. there is no patent error or perversity in approach seen in the conclusions arrived at by the rent control appellate authority and i see no valid or tangible reason to interfere with the well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1999 (HC)

Anugraha Jewellers Ltd. and anr. Vs. K.R.S. Mani and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-17-1999

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas501(Mad)

..... a month. one of the artisans also appeared before the commissioner and has stated about it. therefore, the commissioner report shows clearly that the allegations made by the respondents are patently false. the report of the commissioner does not support any prima facie case in favour of the respondents.24. the main accusation is that a sum of rs. 1.37 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 1999 (HC)

Subramanian N. Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-28-1999

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ913Mad

..... concerned, nothing has been done in a proper manner as per the expectations of law. the enquiry proceedings instituted in this case is nothing short of an enquiry suffering from patent errors of law and perversity in approach besides the whole proceeding getting vitiated on account of mala fides. hence, the dismissal order passed by the second respondent becomes liable only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1999 (SC)

Corporation of Madras Vs. M.K. Buhari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-1999

Reported in : 2000(9)SCC497

..... to the extent of rs 6600 together with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till payment, by judgment and decree dated 20-3-1984.4. in letters patent appeal, the division bench modified the said judgment and decreed and awarded mesne profits @ rs 1650 per month from may 1976 to april 1978. against that judgment, this appeal is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //