Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 1999 Page 12 of about 1,031 results (0.011 seconds)

Mar 11 1999 (HC)

Shri Uttam Pednekar (Since Deceased Through His Legal Representative a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-11-1999

Reported in : AIR2000Bom178; 1999(3)BomCR622

..... are inclined to hold that the word 'village' used in section 29 of the mundkar act will have to be read in wider sense.11. in the result, the letters patent appeal stands allowed. the order of the learned single judge dated 17-2-1997 in writ petition no. 430/92 is set aside, so far as it holds that the ..... a dwelling house which is situated in a municipal area and such mundkars have no right to get themselves registered. it is these findings which are challenged in this letters patent appeal before us. by way of cross objection, the part of the order of the learned single judge which sets aside reappreciation and reversal of the finding of facts by ..... ordern.p. chapalgaonkar, j.1. this letters patent appeal challenges the order of a learned single judge of this court (r.k. batta, j.) in writ petition no. 430/1992 (reported in 1997 (2) g.l.t. 303) ..... direct consequential action. the cross objection filed by the present respondent/bhatkar stands rejected. in the facts of the case, we leave the parties to bear their costs.12. letters patent appeal allowed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 1999 (HC)

Shri Sakharam Parab Vs. M/S. Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd. and An ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-22-1999

Reported in : 1999(4)ALLMR700; 1999(3)BomCR659

..... reason to interfere with the orders passed by the learned single judge of this court, which considers the scope of the enquiry under section 33-c(2) properly. the letters patent appeals are summarily dismissed. we direct the corporation to proceed with the determination of the nature of the suspension period of both these appellants and after giving them due hearing ..... holding that the applications were not maintainable under section 33-c(2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947. this order of the learned single judge is challenged in these letters patent appeals.2. we have heard both learned counsel on the point of maintainability of such an application under section 33-c(2) and also on the point whether the corporation ..... ordern.p. chapalgaonkar, j. 1. these appeals are filed under clause 15 of the letters patent of this court challenging the order of the learned single judge passed on 9th september, 1998, in writ petitions no. 415/97 and 417/97. appellants herein are workers employed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1999 (HC)

Suvidya Yadav Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-1999

Reported in : (1999)122PLR91

..... single judge had passed the judgment under appeal in two cases viz. civil writ petition no. 12700 and 15923 of 1993. it has been stated before us that no letters patent appeal has been filed by any one against the judgment in civil writ petition no.15923 of 1993. the result is that the decision in that case has attained finality ..... on having been found suitable by the commission, they are entitled to be considered for appointment. no one has appeared on behalf of the writ petitioner to contest the letters patent appeal.3. the question that arises for consideration is - could the commission recommend the names of persons in excess of the posts which had been actually advertised? admittedly, the commission ..... by the judgment of the learned single judge, the appellant, suvidya yadav as also the haryana public service commission have filed letters patent appeals no. 263 and 562 of 1994.2. mr. khehar, learned counsel for the appellant in letter patent appeal no. 263 of 1994 has contended that additional posts had become available prior to the declaration of the result. thus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1999 (HC)

The Chief Manager, Allahabad Bank and anr. Vs. Smt. Swarnlata Narayan

Court : Patna

Decided on : Dec-17-1999

..... judgment and order dated 20.1.1998 passed by a learned judge of this court, sitting singly.10. the bank has brought this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent of this court against the judgment passed by the learned single judge.11. this appeal was admitted for hearing on 29.6.1998 when a bench of this court, refusing ..... aftab alam, j.1. the short question that arises for consideration in this letters patent appeal is whether or not the expression 'employees who retired' used in sub clause 7 of clause 3 (the applicability clause) of the allahabad bank (employees) pension regulations, 1995 also ..... .25. in these circumstances even though deciding the legal issues in favour of the bank, i would refrain from disturbing the operative portion of the order under appeal. this letters patent appeal is disposed of accordingly. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 1999 (HC)

Haridwar Choubey Vs. the Managing Director, Bihar State Financial Corp ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-14-1999

..... nor any case of mala fide has been made out, the learned single judge rightly dismissed the writ petition and the order thus, does not warrant any interference in letters patent jurisdiction. 10. shri ram balak mahto, learned counsel for respondent no. 3, made the following submissions. two auction notices were published in 1995 and 1997. but there is, nothing on ..... premises of fact and law, 1 do not find any error in the judgment and order of the learned single judge to warrant any interference in the matter. this letters patent appeal is accordingly dismissed but without any order as to cost. gukusharan sharma, j. 21. iagree. ..... s.n. jha, j. 1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment and order of a learned single judge of this court dated 25-6-99 in cwjc no. 9667 of 1998 dismissing the appellant's .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1999 (HC)

Jarnail Singh and ors. Vs. Joint Director, Panchayats and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-19-1999

Reported in : (1999)122PLR361

..... commissioner and the learned single judge have decided against the appellants. they have ordered their eviction from the land in dispute. not satisfied, the appellants have filed the present letters patent appeal. a few facts as relevant for the decision of this case may be briefly noticed.2. the appellants claim that they were in possession of agricultural land measuring 3 ..... , the order of the collector was up-held.5. before the learned single judge, certain technical pleas were raised. these having been rejected, the appellants have filed the present letters patent appeal.6. mr. viney mittal, learned counsel for the appellants has contended that in view of the decree passed by the civil court, the appellants were the owners of the ..... order would be perfectly justified under section 7. still further, these orders having been confirmed by the commissioner and the learned single judge, no ground for interference in the letters patent appeal is made out. we find no illegality in the view taken by the court.9. no other point has been raised.10. in view of the above, we find .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1999 (HC)

Firozkhan Huseinmiya Rathod Vs. Commissioner of Police for the City of ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-18-1999

Reported in : (1999)3GLR648

..... maintenance of public order and unless prevented there was possibility of the appellants to commit/repeat offences. it is this decision which has been subjected to challenge in these letters patent appeals.4. we have heard mr. anil dave, learned advocate for the appellants in all the three appeals and ms. harsha devani, ld. a.g.p. for the government. mr ..... , the learned counsel for the appellants and the ld. a.g.p. have argued the matters and, therefore, the same are being finally disposed of.2. all the three letters patent appeals arise from a common judgment rendered by the learned single judge on 28/6/1999 and 29/6/1999 in special civil applications nos. 8629, 8625 and of 1998 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 1999 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Pravinbhai Bhailalbhai Gor

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-23-1999

Reported in : (2000)3GLR288

..... petition and quashed the impugned notice. hence the original respondent, state of gujarat has now come up before this court by way of present letters patent appeal invoking the aids of the clause 15 of the letters patent.5. we have heard the learned advocates appearing for the parties. we have examined the facts and circumstances emerging from the record of the ..... j.n. bhatt, j.1. the short question which has been raised in this letters patent appeal, challenging the judgment and order recorded by the learned single judge on 1.9.98 in special civil application no.1123 of 1998, whereby the the said petition filed .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1999 (HC)

Sheonandan Prasad Vs. Babunandan Prasad and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-05-1999

..... decreed.6. being aggrieved by it, the defendant preferred f.a. no. 33/83(r) which was dismissed by the learned single judge on 16-7-1991. hence this letters patent appeal has been brought by the defendant-appellant.7. the learned single judge concurred with the finding of the trial court that the agreement for sale dated 17-1-1977 ..... by the learned single judge. thus, in the circumstances stated above, there is no merit in the above contention of the appellant's counsel.21. in the result, the letters patent appeal is dismissed as it lacks merit. no costs. ..... a.k. prasad, j.1. this letters patent appeal by the sole defendant sheo nandan prasad in t.s. no. 62/80, arises out of judgment dated 16-7-91 in f.a. no. 33/83(r) dismissing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 1999 (HC)

Gurcharan Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-04-1999

Reported in : AIR1999P& H283; (1999)123PLR317

..... shall be gone into. there shall be no order as to costs.'6. aggrieved by the judgment, the landlord gurcharan singh, son of dhanna singh, has filed the present letters patent appeal.7. mr. viney mittal, learned counsel for the appellant contended that the learned single judge could not have annulled the earlier judgment. it was also contended that respondents nos ..... , he had migrated to india. would dhanna singh be not entitled to the protection of section 51-a? this is the primary question that arises for consideration in this letters patent appeal. the sequence of events as relevant for the decision of this case may be briefly noticed.2. dhanna singh was allotted land by way of a military grant. on ..... restoration of the possession. the competent authority shall, however, consider the claim of respondents nos. 4 to 9 for allotment of alternative land in accordance with law.31. the letters patent appeal is, accordingly, allowed. no costs. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //