Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 2004 Page 10 of about 1,374 results (0.013 seconds)

Apr 01 2004 (HC)

S.P.S. Jayam and Co. Vs. the Registrar, Tamilnadu Taxation Special Tri ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-01-2004

Reported in : (2004)3MLJ74; [2004]137STC117(Mad)

..... , 1977), the court observed as under:-' this definition also shows that the expression signifies 'things and rights considered as having a money value'. even incorporeal rights like trade marks, copyrights, patents or rights in personam capable of transfer or transmission, such as debts, are also included in its ambit.' the court, in the later part of the said judgment, again observed ..... as follows:- ' similarly, patents, copyrights and other rights in rem which are not rights over land are also included within the meaning of movable property.' c. volume 112 stc 370 (commissioner of sales tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2004 (HC)

Dinesh S/O Balkrishna Dande Vs. Somani Radio Corporation and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-29-2004

Reported in : 2005(2)MhLj800

..... totally perverse conclusion which are contrary to law settled by the apex court and thus, the reviewing authority has committed manifest error of law and its findings of fact are patently perverse. in fact, the reviewing authority has exercised jurisdiction not otherwise available to it. in such circumstances, the argument of tenant cannot be accepted and such errors can be corrected ..... should not ordinarily interfered with by the high court in exercise of writ jurisdiction, unless the court is satisfied that finding is vitiated by manifest error of law or is patently perverse. the apex court has held that the high court should not interfere with the finding of fact simply because it feels persuaded to take different view on the material .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2004 (HC)

Raghothaman and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-12-2004

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1974; II(2004)DMC622; ILR2004KAR1322

..... down by the learned sessions judge. now, the petitioners have come up before this court seeking quashing of the proceedings.7. the material on record clearly goes to show that, patently, the 2nd respondent was married to one r. narayanaswamy as per hindu rites and customs on 26.6.1986. both the husband and wife have filed petition under section 13 ..... marriage between the parties for the purpose of invoking the provisions of section 498a or sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act.12. in the case on hand, patently, as on the date of marriage of the 2nd respondent with the first petitioner, the 2nd respondent had been legally wedded wife of one narayanaswamy and the said marriage was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2004 (HC)

Uttar Pradesh Ganna Sodh Parishad Genda Singh Ganna Evam Anushandhan S ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-10-2004

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR827]; (2004)2UPLBEC1731

..... ? undoubtedly it is. its discoveries are valuable contributions to the wealth of the nation. such discoveries may be sold for a heavy price in the industrial and innovations may be patented and sold. in our scientific and technological age nothing has more cash value, as intangible goods and invaluable services, than discoveries. for instance, the discoveries of thomas alva edison made ..... of section 2 (j) of the industrial disputes act as it involves collaboration between the employer and the employee for the advancement of the technology and technical innovation which are patented and sold but the apex court has itself explained the judgment of the bangalore water supply and sewerage board in the case of physical laboratory which is directly on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2004 (HC)

Committee of Management, Sri Bajrani Uchchattar Madhyamik Vidyalaya an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-01-2004

Reported in : (2005)2UPLBEC1374

..... rank list to get appointment against the available vacancies, had b.ed. candidates been excluded from the selections. the impugned judgment of the division bench is both illegal, inequitable and patently unjust. the t.t.c. candidates before us a appellants have been wrongly deprived of due chance of selection and appointment. the impugned judgment of the division bench, therefore, deserves ..... departure was made in considering the b.ed. candidates and we are told that was so done because of the paucity of t.t.c. candidates, we cannot allow a patent illegality to continue, the recruitment authorities were well aware that candidates with qualification of t.t.c. and b.ed. are available yet they chose to restrict entry for appointment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2004 (HC)

Radhey Shyam Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-10-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC188; (2005)2UPLBEC1181

..... cannot purport to reach final conclusions, for that again would be the province of the industrial tribunal.therefore, while conceding a very limited jurisdiction to the state government to examine patent frivolousness of the demands, it is to be understood as a rule, that adjudication of demands made by workmen should be left to the tribunal to decide.'14. ram avtar ..... the question as to whether its power to make a reference should be exercised under section 10(1) read with section 12(5), or not. if the claim made is patently frivolous, or is clearly belated, the appropriate government may refuse to make a reference.likewise, if the impact of the claim on the general relations between the employer and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2004 (HC)

Takshila Educational Society Vs. Dit (investigation)

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-08-2004

..... any delaying tactics. it is also contended that the grounds under sections 132(1)(a), (b) and (c) of the act are not satisfied, therefore, the search and seizure was patently illegal. it was lastly contended that if the order of reassessment shows that the expenditures were not 3 crores but were 5 crores, then there would be no case of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2004 (HC)

Tuniram Katoni and ors. Vs. Golap Chandra Katoni

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-23-2004

..... say that in a matter like the one at hand civil court's jurisdiction would not be barred in the following cases :(1) when the order under rule 18 is patently illegal or without jurisdiction;(2) where the remedy provided by the regulation to adjudge the objection raised is not sufficient;(3) where complicated questions relating to title are involved; or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2004 (HC)

Basanta Saikia Vs. Assistant Labour Commissioner and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Dec-23-2004

..... is plainly without authority and the order dated 13.5.2002 of the appellate bench having nullified the procedure prescribed by the industrial disputes act, the said order discloses a patent error which would require correction in exercise of the power of review. lastly, it has been submitted by mr. mahanta, learned counsel, that the petitioner has been prejudiced by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2004 (HC)

Takshila Educational Society Vs. Director of Income-tax (investigation ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-08-2004

..... any delaying tactics. it is also contended that the grounds under section 132(1)(a), (b) and (c) of the act are not satisfied, therefore the search and seizure was patently illegal, ft was lastly contended that if the order of reassessment shows that the expenditures were not rs. 3 crores but were rs. 5 crores, then there would be no .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //