Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 2004 Page 11 of about 1,374 results (0.013 seconds)

Feb 09 2004 (HC)

Shri Somsingh Chandrasingh Thakur Vs. the Head Master, Capt. R.M. Oak ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-09-2004

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR401; 2004(2)MhLj980

..... appointed on 14th june. 1971. though the petitioner was promoted as an assistant head master on 3rd december 1984, the promotion of the petitioner as an assistant head master was patently unlawful since this was an isolated post to which the petitioner could not be promoted on the basis that he belonged to a reserved category. hence, upon the disposal of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2004 (HC)

Akhil Bhartiya Shramik Kamgar Union Vs. Buildtech Constructions and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-31-2004

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR23; [2004(101)FLR915]; 2004(3)MhLj142

..... raised in the written statement, without judicial satisfaction of its necessity and justification. the court has further observed that there can be cases when tenancy plea may appear to be patently frivolous, fraudulent and part of the dilatory strategy, in pandu's case (supra), this court has observed that when plea of tenancy is raised, and if it is a vague .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2004 (HC)

Babasaheb Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-16-2004

Reported in : II(2004)DMC457

..... and examined her. the doctor opined that the patient was in fit condition to make a statement and, accordingly, made an endorsement on the dying declaration. after ascertaining about the patent's fitness, he proceeded to record her statement after he had asked her relations as well as police officials to go out. he disclosed his identity to the patient and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2004 (HC)

Ramakant Atmaram Manjerekar Vs. N.T.C. (M.N.) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-08-2004

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR106; (2005)ILLJ311Bom; 2004(4)MhLj541

..... as a result of a strike which was attributable to the fault of the workman. in the absence of any such evidence both the controlling authority and appellate authority were patently in error in treating the period between 18th january, 1982 and 18th october, 1983 as a period for which the petitioner would not be entitled to benefit in the computation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2004 (HC)

Harischandra Vithoba Narawade and ors. Vs. Smt. Vatsalabai W/O Narayan ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-22-2004

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj897

..... created hatred towards daughter. it may be said that, the contents to the effect that, the daughter is happy at her house (matrimonial house) as contained in the will, are patently false. the portion reproduced by the district judge from the will is clear indication of the psychology to grab the property. advocate shri babulgaonkar for the defendants urged that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2004 (HC)

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs. D.N. Vidhate and Shri S.N. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2004

Reported in : 2005(2)BomCR662; [2005(104)FLR1078]; 2005(1)MhLj666

..... to bring about any improvement and in those circumstances the order of the labour court and industrial court holding that punishment of dismissal was shockingly disproportionate and directing reinstatement was patently erroneous. reliance was also placed on the judgment in the case of devendra swamy v. karnataka state road transport corporation, 2002 1 clr 323, that once the charge was found .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 2004 (HC)

Laxminarayan S/O Motilal Gupta Vs. Bhagwandas S/O Bhagonelal Sahu and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-22-2004

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj646

..... not be exercised in a routine manner, but there are no limitations and restrictions on the reviewing authority to exercise its power to correct its findings of fact which are patently erroneous and have resulted in failure of justice.'13. thus, on the basis of this position in law, it is clear that the reviewing authority has refused to exercise jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2004 (HC)

B. Sankappa Rai and ors. Vs. Central Registrar of Co-operative Societi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-05-2004

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4298; 2004(7)KarLJ330

..... which require enquiry. the deletion of the names of the petitioners and similarly placed names from the voters list of the society is without authority of law and it is patently illegal. hence the decision of the supreme court reported in whirlpool corporation vs registrar of trade marks, mumbai, : air1999sc22 wherein the constitutional bench decision of the supreme court reported in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2004 (HC)

Ashok Kademani and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Secretary, Departme ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-28-2004

Reported in : AIR2005Kant124; 2005(2)KarLJ267

..... immovable property for the municipal council, in terms of land acquisition act, 1964 after payment by the municipal council of the compensation awarded under that act etc. this provision, quite patently, does not empower the state or its authorities to take over the borewell of the petitioners. the contention of the learned h.c.g.p. that the respondents no. 1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2004 (HC)

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) an ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Reported in : AIR2005Kant50; ILR2005KAR1278; 2005(1)KarLJ118

..... specific relief sought for to strike down or declare them ultra vires, cannot confer any further sanctity or authority and validity which it is shown and found to obviously and patently lacking. [see bharathidasan university and anr. v. all india council for technical education and ors., air 2001 sc 2861 : (2001)8 scc 676. the power to frame rules is conferred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //