Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 2004 Page 5 of about 1,374 results (0.042 seconds)

Mar 25 2004 (HC)

Kala Vs. Amrit Kumar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-25-2004

Reported in : 2005ACJ427

..... ) corporeal personal property, which includes movable and tangible things such as animals, furniture, merchandise, etc. and (2) incorporeal personal property which consists of such rights as personal amenities, stocks, shares, patents and copy rights.19. considering the inclusive nature of the definition of the word 'property' (quoted above) a wider meaning has to be given to the term, that is, property .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2004 (FN)

Sabaf Spa (a Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Italy) (Respondent ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

..... new york. 44. mr thorley also relied upon cases in the netherlands, france and germany in which foreign sellers had been held liable for patent infringement. in probel v parke davis (1964 nj 1372, no 494) the supreme court of the netherlands decided that a belgian seller had infringed ..... not been suggested that there was: "anything inventive in the specific arrangement or design of parts required for the burners the subject of the patent, other than those arrangements or designs which are included to overcome the first two disadvantages" 30. mr thorley said that this was not so ..... the integers." 18. although this statement was made by reference to the pre-1977 united kingdom law, the same principles are applied by the european patent office. the judge referred to the epo guidelines for substantive examination, where the following statement of principle appears in the current (dec 2003) edition ..... not been suggested that there is anything inventive in the specific arrangement or design of parts required for the burners the subject of the patent, other than those arrangements or designs which are included to overcome the first two disadvantages. therefore it is the first two disadvantages and the ..... venturi effect", increased its pressure. 5. the pipe was a substantial piece of hardware taking up space beneath the hob. the specification of the patent in suit described the disadvantages of such burners: "they are relatively tall, for which reason they are not suitable or cannot be used for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2004 (HC)

Balwant Singh Chaudhary Vs. the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limite ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-11-2004

Reported in : (2004)137PLR198

..... was necessary to plead the nature of the business which the appellants-plaintiffs wanted to start in the premises. we are of the view that the high court fell into patent error. it was not necessary for the appellants-landlords to indicate the precise nature of the business which they intended to start in the premises. even if the nature of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2004 (HC)

Gurcharan Singh and anr. Vs. Gurudwara Shri Singh Sabha (Regd.)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-04-2004

Reported in : AIR2004P& H270; (2004)137PLR330

..... of warrants of possession is allowed.'5. shri aman bahri, learned counsel for the judgment-debtor petitioners has argued that the order passed by the executing court suffers from a patent illegality because under order 21 rule 32 of the code no warrant of possession could be issued because the decree passed by the court does not contemplate handing over of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2004 (HC)

Smadh Bawa Maru Dass Vs. the Financial Commissioner, Appeals and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-27-2004

Reported in : (2004)137PLR348

..... by collector, jalandhar, cw.p. no.4684 of 1971 filed by the petitioner for quashing order dated 6.1.1970 was dismissed by the learned single judge and the letters patent appeal filed against the order of the learned single judge was dismissed by the division bench.4. in the meanwhile, respondent no. 2 suo motu set aside order dated 16 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2004 (HC)

Parveen Kumar and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-11-2004

Reported in : (2004)137PLR432

..... .1976 (annexure p4) and the commissioner, jalandhar division, jalandhar on 22.12.1976 (annexure p5). therefore, the order dated 6.7.1983 passed by the financial commissioner, punjab suffers from patent illegality and the same is liable to be set aside.8. the argument of the learned state counsel is based on the views expressed by the commissioner, jalandhar division, jullundur .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2004 (HC)

Jangir Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-24-2004

Reported in : (2004)137PLR647

..... mumkin land at the rate of rs. 60,000/- per acre.they will in addition, be entitled to solatium and interest as provided under the amended act.'6. the letter patent appeal against the said judgment of the learned single judge was also dismissed by a division bench of this court in lpa no. 220 of 1993 titled state of punjab .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2004 (HC)

Rajesh Singh and anr. Vs. Smt. Hardev Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-27-2004

Reported in : (2004)137PLR752

..... to defend their case in the interest of justice. consequently, the application is allowed.4. mr. r.k. jain, learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioners has argued that there is patent illegally committed by the civil judge because defendant-respondent no. 5 has acted on the basis of the registered power of attorney no. 98/4 dated 30.11.1994. according .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2004 (HC)

Bihar Intermediate Education Council and ors. Vs. Pramod Kumar and ors ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-18-2004

..... indeed there are issues and the writ petition needs to be heard. learned counsel in his preliminary objection pointed out to the court that the ground for maintaining the letters patent appeal is mentioned in paragraph 15 of the appeal. it is stated in this paragraph :'that it is respectfully submitted that since hearing of the writ petition is not likely ..... 'it is certify (sic) that grounds set forth in this appeal are good grounds for letters patent appeal'.8. on this, learned counsel for the respondent-petitioner took a preliminary objection, to the effect, that nothing has been pointed out on what exactly is the illegality in ..... r.s. garg, j.7. now, the council has filed a letters parent appeal to challenge the order of the learned judge with a prayer that the letters patent appeal be admitted and the order of the learned judge admitting the writ petition be set-aside. a certificate is given by the advocate for the appellants to state that ..... as such the appellants have been advised to move this hon'ble court in appeal against the impugned order.'9. the preliminary objection taken against the letters patent appeal is not unfounded.10. the letters patent appeal jurisdiction itself rests on: justice, equity and good conscience. there were certain questions which were put to the appellants. these were: was the learned judge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2004 (HC)

Sicom Ltd. Vs. Harjindersingh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-23-2004

Reported in : AIR2004Bom337; IV(2004)BC350; 2004(5)BomCR304; [2005]123CompCas653(Bom); 2005(1)CTLJ299(Bom)

..... within mumbai. it is, however, not in dispute that the plaint has been entertained pursuant to leave granted by my predecessor under clause 12 of the letters patent. in the first place, that order is still operating and has not been assailed before the appropriate forum nor any formal application has been moved for setting aside the same ..... submissions and the pleadings, as filed, i shall proceed to deal with the objection regarding maintainability of the suit on the ground that leave under clause 12 of the letters patent has been wrongly granted in favour of the plaintiffs. according to the defendants, ho part of cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this court and in particular ..... by the defendants, inter-alia, by raising following defences:4. in the first place, it is contended that leave to institute the present suit under clause 12 of the letters patent has been wrongly granted by this court. it is stated on behalf of the defendants that the leave granted by this court is on the basis of documents executed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //