Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Year: 2004 Page 8 of about 1,374 results (0.025 seconds)

Aug 12 2004 (SC)

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Shyam Lal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-12-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC4271; 2004(6)ALD98(SC); 2004(3)AWC2697(SC); 113(2004)DLT1(SC); [2004(102)FLR1021]; JT2004(6)SC347; (2004)IIILLJ532SC; 2004(6)SCALE611; (2004)8SCC88; 2005(1)SLJ56(S

..... , j. 1. delhi transport corporation (hereinafter referred to as the 'employer') calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a division bench of the delhi high court in letters patent appeal no. 298/2002 filed by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the 'workman'). 2. background facts in a nutshell are as follows:the respondent-workman was found to have ..... )(b) of the act was to be granted to the employer to dismiss the respondent-workman. 4. the workman assailed the judgment of the learned single judge by filing letters patent appeal. by the impugned judgment by which several lpas and writ petitions were disposed of, the view of the tribunal was restored and that of learned single judge was set ..... making the admission to show why the admission is not to be acted upon. 8. be that as it may, we find that the division bench while dealing with letters patent appeal filed by the workman based its conclusions on other cases which related to unauthorized absence and where the factual background was not similar to those involved in the present .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 2004 (HC)

Tushar D. Bhatt Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-14-2004

Reported in : (2004)3GLR680

..... disciplinary authority in some cases while not doing so in other cases. in such cases, the right of the employee depends upon the choice of the higher/ appellate authority which patently results in discrimination between an employee and employee. surely, such a situation cannot savour of legality. hence we are of the view that the contention advanced on behalf of the ..... also it is our common experience that petitions of the single judge are placed before the division bench hearing petitions involving identical issue, causing loss of right of filing letter patent appeal to some of the litigants, much to their dislike; but such course is permissible and many a times it is resorted to by this court. similarly in criminal appeals ..... single judge of this court quashed the order of termination of the service of the petitioner. against the said decision of the learned single judge, g.e.b. preferred letters patent appeal before the division bench. the division bench confirmed the order of reinstatement in service, but modified the order with regard to payment of back wages and reduced it from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2004 (HC)

Ayesaben Nur Mohammad Vs. Competent Authority

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-25-2004

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1082

..... that these are illegally acquired properties. the orders of the competent authority as well as appellate tribunal are even otherwise erroneous and bad in law. the order of detention is patently bad and illegal even on the ground that for the alleged incident, for which the cofeposa order has been passed, the detenue has been acquitted by the competent criminal court ..... as the order of the appellate tribunal are illegal and could not be sustained.10. mr. sanjanwala has further submitted that the order of detention passed against the detenue is patently bad and illegal. if the competent authority wanted to base the safema proceedings on the order of detention of the detenue, it was mandatory for them to have served a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2004 (HC)

Vinodkumar Rajabhai Rathod Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-05-2004

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1274

..... receipt of the final list of candidates recommended by the gpsc. all these directions were confirmed by the division bench in the judgment dated 11.12.2002 in the letters patent appeals with scathing criticism of the tortious inaction on the part of the state government and gpsc. the state government did not, however, pay heed to the above directions and ..... learned single judge was carried in appeals and by judgment dated 11.12.2002 (reported in 2003(2) glr 1343) the letters patent bench dismissed the appeals and confirmed the directions given by the learned single judge. the letters patent bench also took serious note of the inaction on the part of the state government as well as the gpsc of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2004 (HC)

Bhanuben L. Chovatiya Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-05-2004

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1411; [2005(106)FLR770]

..... receipt of the final list of candidates recommended by the gpsc. all these directions were confirmed by the division bench in the judgment dated 11.12.2002 in the letters patent appeals with scathing criticism of the tortious inaction on the part of the state government and gpsc. the state government did not, however, pay heed to the above directions and ..... learned single judge was carried in appeals and by judgment dated 11.12.2002 (reported in 2003(2) glr 1343) the letters patent bench dismissed the appeals and confirmed the directions given by the learned single judge. the letters patent bench also took serious note of the inaction on the part of the state government as well as the gpsc of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2004 (HC)

Jata Shankar Jha Vs. Madhubani Municipality and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-13-2004

..... holds a doctorate and is over qualified. one good job is as good as any other job when there is a dire necessity to be employed.5. in this letters patent appeal, it is clear that there is an apprehension of the appellant-respondent (no. 3) that he may see himself out of a job. since the matter is to be ..... of the judgment on the writ petition.15. initially, in the circumstances, this appeal cannot succeed as the decision on it is not incorrect and the issues in the letters patent appeal apparently have transgressed on other issues upon which the court has reflected.16. thus, this appeal stands dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2004 (HC)

Bharatiya Bhavan Co-operative Housing Society Limited and anr. Vs. Kri ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-24-2004

Reported in : AIR2004Bom387; 2004(2)ALLMR340; 2004(5)BomCR196; 2004(2)MhLj810

..... conferred only upon those persons who have been enrolled as advocates of the high court under the said bar councils act, which is in conformity with clause x of letters patent. in murlidhar datoba. nimanka's case (supra), it was held by me that the provisions of civil procedure code are not applicable to the proceedings before the co-operative court while dealing ..... case wherein the petitioner in civil revision application was seeking audience through his attorney, after referring to order iii, rules 1 and 2 as well as clause x of letters patent and section 8 of the bar councils act, 1926 and section 9 of the bombay pleaders act, 1920, held that 'the expression, 'appearance, application or act' in or to any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2004 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi), Through the General Manager, Western Railways an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-05-2004

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR422

..... we are not concerned here. 6. mr. sureshkumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner union of india strongly contended that the above judgment of the central administrative tribunal is patently contrary to the judgment of the supreme court in union of india and anr. v. r.s. sharma 2000 (2) llj 1271, wherein a similar rule as in the instant ..... division bench judgment of our high court in r.p. mittal v. union of india, we are clearly of the view that the judgment of the central administrative tribunal is patently erroneous and is perverse and contrary to the above judgment of the supreme court. under these circumstances, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a), however with no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2004 (HC)

N. Dolendra Prasad Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-18-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD545

..... are of the view that the action of the respondents in waiving an essential pre-qualification condition in favour of the seven bidders qualifying them as pre-qualified tenderers is patently arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory suffering from malice in law and for that reason the selection of the seven bidders to be placed on the select list of short-listed pre-qualified ..... in state of m.p. v. nandlal jaiswal,. : [1987]1scr1 , held that a policy decision can be interfered with by the courts only if such decision is shown to be patently arbitrary, discriminatory or mala fide. in the matter of different modes under the rule of general application made under m.p. excise act, the court found that the four different .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2004 (HC)

Janathan Das Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-28-2004

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR251(Jhr)]

..... within the category of being patently absurd and/or perverse and consequently illegal and therefore deserves to be set aside by this court. the reasons which compel this court to come to the aforementioned conclusion are ..... of the constitution of india does not sit as an appellate authority in respect of an award passed by the labour court unless it is established that the award is patently illegal, arbitrary or perverse.4. after having looked into the award and the various documents brought on record, this court is clearly of the opinion that the instant case fails .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //