Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pawnee contract Court: drat madras Page 6 of about 53 results (0.016 seconds)

Mar 29 2006 (TRI)

Indian Bank Vs. Techno Futura International Ltd.

Court : DRAT Madras

Reported in : IV(2006)BC133

..... .it is contention of the learned advocate for the respondents that the courts are not helpless and hapless in overcoming any stringent or onerous clause incorporated in any agreement or contract. in support of his submission, the respondents relied upon the case of smt. periyakkal and ors. v. smt. dakshayani, (supra), wherein it was observed, "4. in the case before us .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2007 (TRI)

Mangala Builders Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Syndicate Bank, Arm Branch Rep. by

Court : DRAT Madras

..... state when it takes action in exercise of its statutory or executive power is the state entitled to deal with its property in any manner it likes or award a contract to any person it chooses without any constitutional limitations upon it ?" in the said context, it was observed even a stranger can challenge the action of the court.i am .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2003 (TRI)

Smt. S.K. Gowrikutty Amma and ors. Vs. Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd.

Court : DRAT Madras

Reported in : II(2004)BC68

..... . counsel for the respondent bank submitted that as per the rate of interest agreed, the defendants are liable to pay interest and civil courts cannot alter the terms of the contract. he relies upon the decision of the himachal pradesh high court in ii (1999) banking cases 592 (divisional bench) (state bank of india v. mandav udyog and ors.) wherein it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //