Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel appellate jurisdiction Page 1 of about 2 results (0.031 seconds)

Dec 21 2012 (TRI)

M/S. Jsw Steel Limited and Others Vs. Karnataka Electricity Regulatory ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... not made a party to the appeal in the appeal no 137 of 2011). later, by the order of the honble bombay high court dated 10.10.2008 jsw energy (vijaynagar) ltd merged with jsw energy ltd and all the assets came to be vested in the jsw energy ltd. with ..... is to be considered as a captive generation plant. 11. the central government in exercise of powers conferred under section 176 of the electricity act, 2003 (act 36 of 2003) has made rules called ??the electricity rules, 2005). rule 3 of the rules of 2005 lays down the requirements of ..... are to be treated as captive consumption by jsw steel itself. but the jpocl and boc india limited are independent companies, incorporated under the companies act having their own identities. hence, electricity consumption by these two companies cannot be considered as consumption of jsw steel limited itself, though jsw steel ..... claimed by the appellant including for electricity use for conversion of oxygen ought to have been liberally construed to sub-serve the objective of electricity act, 2003. the appellant had entered into an arrangement for dedicated oxygen supply by conversion of its facilities by engaging with the companies having ..... steel which is not making any revenue or profit whatsoever on the power supply. c) the liberalization of the captive generation under the electricity act, 2003 was because of the inability of the distribution licensee to meet the growing demand of electricity, particularly, for industrial requirements and, therefore, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2014 (TRI)

In the Matter Of: M/S. Meenakshi Energy Private Limited Vs. Central El ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... by a particular authority, such things has to be done by such authority alone and not by any other authority. this principle has been laid down by the honble supreme court in the case of (1989) 3 scc 132 marathwada university v seshrao balwant rao chavan. 49. therefore, this issue is decided in favour of the appellant. 50. the ..... respondent. it is engaged in the power transmission business with the mandate for planning, coordination, supervision and control over the complete inter-state transmission system. (g) in june, 2008, the meenakshi energy private limited, the appellant filed an application before the power grid corporation of india limited (r-4) for long term open access for evacuation of power from ..... their generation stations to the power grids nellore sub-station including the transmission line between the two generating stations is a dedicated transmission system. ii) according to the electricity act,2003 and the indian electricity grid code, the regional load dispatch centre is responsible for optimum scheduling and dispatch of electricity within the region, in accordance with the contracts ..... the apex body to ensure integrated operation of the power system in the concerned region. 33. the term power system has been defined under section 2 (5) of the electricity act, 2003. it means that all aspects of generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity and includes generating stations, transmission or main transmission lines, sub-stations, tie-lines, load .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //