Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on : Nov-11-2009
..... of medical expenses framed by the state of punjab on 25-1-1991 and 8-10-1991. 22. this court, however, considered the validity of a rule in regard to reimbursement of the medical expenses vis- a-vis the fundamental right of a citizen in terms ..... himself, who else will do it? therefore one should do what is good to himself." we may, however, notice that in that case, before this court, rules framed under the proviso to article 309 of the constitution of india, were not in force. what were in force were the policies regarding reimbursement ..... of the respondents to consider the case with utmost sympathy, within the frame work of the rules and regulations. 8. law laid down by the supreme court has always to be kept in view while deciding the issues coming before the tribunal. as such, it is very much appropriate (perhaps essential too) to ..... one of the recent case on the subject is state of karnataka v. r. vivekananda swamy, (2008) 5 scc 328, wherein, the apex court has held as under: 20. law operating in this field, as is propounded by courts from time to time and relevant for our purpose, may now be taken note of. 21. ..... keeping in view the spirit in grant of medical facilities/medical reimbursement as highlighted by the apex court in the case of vivekananda swamy(supra) arrive at a judicious conclusion and inform the first respondent, who would act on the basis of the decision as communicated by the railway board. 11. the matter pertains .....Tag this Judgment!