Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Court: delhi Page 6 of about 350 results (0.079 seconds)

May 12 2017 (HC)

Gopal Ansal vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... accused. (4) that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of ..... mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra [(1981) 2 scc443:1981. scc (cri) 4 air1981sc1062 .) 137. in yogesh v. state of maharashtra [(2008) 10 scc394: (2009) 1 scc (cri) 51]. this court held: (scc p. 402, para25) in fact crl.rev.p. 262/2016, crl.rev.p. 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & ..... , 1st supplementary charge sheet dated 23.05.2007 came to be filed whereby certain documents including the cfsl report, were filed in the court. thereafter, 2nd supplementary charge sheet dated 18.01.2008 came to be filed, whereby the following persons were also arrayed as accused: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. mr. ..... the decisions in superintendent & remembrancer of legal affairs, west bengal v. anil kumar bhunja, reported as (1979) 4 scc274 palwinder singh v. balwinder singh, reported as (2008) 14 scc504 om wati v. state thr. delhi administration, reported as (2001) 4 scc333 state of m.p. v. s.b. johari, reported as (2000) ..... of evidence and not property . in this behalf, reliance would be placed on the decisions in varsha heera v. state, rendered in crl. rev. pet. 174/2008; sardar singh v. state of haryana, reported as 1977 crl lj1158 s. narasimha kumar & ors. v. state of a.p., reported as 2003 crl lj3188 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2017 (HC)

Sushil Ansal vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... accused. (4) that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of ..... mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra [(1981) 2 scc443:1981. scc (cri) 4 air1981sc1062 .) 137. in yogesh v. state of maharashtra [(2008) 10 scc394: (2009) 1 scc (cri) 51]. this court held: (scc p. 402, para25) in fact crl.rev.p. 262/2016, crl.rev.p. 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & ..... , 1st supplementary charge sheet dated 23.05.2007 came to be filed whereby certain documents including the cfsl report, were filed in the court. thereafter, 2nd supplementary charge sheet dated 18.01.2008 came to be filed, whereby the following persons were also arrayed as accused: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. mr. ..... the decisions in superintendent & remembrancer of legal affairs, west bengal v. anil kumar bhunja, reported as (1979) 4 scc274 palwinder singh v. balwinder singh, reported as (2008) 14 scc504 om wati v. state thr. delhi administration, reported as (2001) 4 scc333 state of m.p. v. s.b. johari, reported as (2000) ..... of evidence and not property . in this behalf, reliance would be placed on the decisions in varsha heera v. state, rendered in crl. rev. pet. 174/2008; sardar singh v. state of haryana, reported as 1977 crl lj1158 s. narasimha kumar & ors. v. state of a.p., reported as 2003 crl lj3188 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2016 (HC)

Anand Raghavan Vs. State of Delhi and Another

Court : Delhi

..... a new order for the custody of the child, and whether the interests of the child can be served best by leaving further proceedings to the foreign court that acted first in the matter of its custody." "it should be observed that as a general rule, where the writ is prosecuted for the purpose of determining ..... husband came to know of the same, the husband decided to initiate legal action in the high court of justice in u.k. the high court of justice in uk passed an order making the children as wards of the court till the time the order was vacated or varied and the wife was directed to return the ..... production to enable him to take the children with him to the uk since they were wards of the court in the uk to enable the foreign court to decide the issue of their foreign custody. the supreme court held that the high court was in error in declining to issue the writ of habeas corpus. the parties were ..... management consultant with diamond cluster and subsequently changed to roland berger in uk. the respondent no.2 also started working at media reach advertising company in march, 2008. the respondent no. 2 went to uk in the hope of starting her married life happily but the petitioner to her shock would always misbehave with her ..... a girl born on 7/8/09) it is ordered that: 8. nethra anand (a girl born on 7/8/09) is and shall remain a ward of this court during the minority or until further order. 9. the respondent mother shall return or cause the return of nethra anand (a girl born on 7/8/09 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2019 (HC)

Ghulam Mohd. Bhat vs.national Investigating Agency

Court : Delhi

..... hon'ble mr. justice brijesh sethi judgment siddharth mridul, j1 the present appeal under section 21(4) of the national investigating agency act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the nia act ) read with section 439 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the cr.p.c. ) assails the ..... the basis of broad probabilities. however, while statute dealing like mcocahaving the provisions contained in sub-section (4) of section 21 of the act, the court may have to probe into the matter deeper so special regard with a to crl.a.1264/2018 page 13 of 23 against collected ..... such as and tada, mcoca and the special enactments the narcotic drugs provisions for bail crl.a.1264/2018 page 10 of 23 the court psychotropic substances act, 1985, is required to record its opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged ..... enunciated that, once charges are framed, it would be safe to assume that a very strong suspicion was founded upon the materials before the court, which prompted the court to form a presumptive opinion as to the existence of the factual ingredients constituting the offence alleged against the accused, to justify the framing ..... against the to justify the framing of charge. in that accused, the accused may have to undertake an situation, arduous task to satisfy the court that despite the framing of charge, the materials presented along with the charge-sheet (report under section 173 crpc), do not make out reasonable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2013 (HC)

Rds Project Ltd Vs. Ratangiri Gas and Power Pvt Ltd and ors

Court : Delhi

..... even bid for the project. g) the contention of the petitioner is that the power of attorney executed in favour of p.surya rao was never acted upon as testified by mr.n.karthikeyan, genereal manager of ehl in his affidavit dated 15.01.2013 for the reason that the defects in power ..... of rgppl to examine the eligibility of the bider and observed as under : .suffice it to say for the present that rgppl as the owner acting as a prudent and responsible public authority discharging public trust obligations was well within its rights to raise questions and seek answers on an important matter like ..... having its registered office at tower house, 1st floor, aberdeen bazar, port blai 101. and m/s. rds project limited, a company incorporated under the indian companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and having its registered office at 427, somdutt chambers-ii, 9, bhikaji cama place, new delhi-110 066, india and branch office ..... of breakwater from the length 102 mtrs. to 200 mtrs i.e. 98 mtrs. learned asg has taken us through the documents obtained by rgppl under rti act as well as the cag report to indicate the extent of work attributed to rds as well as to emphasize that construction of breakwater at mus in ..... bind them or that the same was contrary to the facts. the high court ought to have examined the issue on merits, rather than taking a short cut. the high court has incidentally taken support from the certificate dated 5th april, 2008 and clarification issued on 5th june, 2010 to hold that the rds had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2018 (HC)

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... the ridge area. it was clearly directed that therefore, it could not be utilized in any manner in view of the prohibitions contained in the forest (conservation) act, 1980. it was held by the court that in these circumstances, the issuance of the notification was merely a simple formality to secure the area. the lt. governor of delhi was consequently requested to ..... , both in providing raw materials and in assimilating by-product wastes due to consumption. the largesse of technology can only postpone or disguise the inevitable. improving forever, the professor barbara ward has written of this ecological imperative in particularly vivid language: w.p.(c)no.365/2017 & fao(os)no.200/2017 page 83 of 95 we can forget moral imperatives ..... at 2016 (4) karlj626: manu/ka/0877/2016, n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors. in this pronouncement, reference has been made to the supreme court pronouncement reported at (2008) 17 scc491 bachhaj nahar v. nilima mandal & anr., holding that with regard to an easement of prescription, the plaintiff is required to plead and prove that he was in peaceful, ..... of state v. nagorao tanko deshmukh, air1938nag 415; chapasibhai dhanjibhai danad v. purushottam, air1971sc1878 n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors., 2016 (3) akr86 bachhaj nahar v. nilima mandal & anr., (2008) 17 scc491and laxman v. tukia & ors., air1918nag 166. we have carefully examined these judgments.138. in the judgment reported at air1938nag 415, secretary of state v. nagorao tanko deshmukh, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2018 (HC)

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the ridge area. it was clearly directed that therefore, it could not be utilized in any manner in view of the prohibitions contained in the forest (conservation) act, 1980. it was held by the court that in these circumstances, the issuance of the notification was merely a simple formality to secure the area. the lt. governor of delhi was consequently requested to ..... , both in providing raw materials and in assimilating by-product wastes due to consumption. the largesse of technology can only postpone or disguise the inevitable. improving forever, the professor barbara ward has written of this ecological imperative in particularly vivid language: w.p.(c)no.365/2017 & fao(os)no.200/2017 page 83 of 95 we can forget moral imperatives ..... at 2016 (4) karlj626: manu/ka/0877/2016, n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors. in this pronouncement, reference has been made to the supreme court pronouncement reported at (2008) 17 scc491 bachhaj nahar v. nilima mandal & anr., holding that with regard to an easement of prescription, the plaintiff is required to plead and prove that he was in peaceful, ..... of state v. nagorao tanko deshmukh, air1938nag 415; chapasibhai dhanjibhai danad v. purushottam, air1971sc1878 n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors., 2016 (3) akr86 bachhaj nahar v. nilima mandal & anr., (2008) 17 scc491and laxman v. tukia & ors., air1918nag 166. we have carefully examined these judgments.138. in the judgment reported at air1938nag 415, secretary of state v. nagorao tanko deshmukh, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Kulwinder vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... for the original complainants/appellants in crl.a.139/2012, submitted as under: (i) the defence has for the first time submitted in this court that the poa act would not be applicable since the incident in question was merely a quarrel between two groups, the members of each of which happened to belong ..... and there dr. dinesh kumar prajapat, medical officer met me and told me that patient tara chand was lying at bed no.6 of the emergency ward. thereafter i proceeded towards bed no.6 dr. dinesh kumar prajapat has given certificate regarding fitness of tara chand to make his statement. thereafter i recorded ..... of assam (2002) 10 scc277and crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 39 of 209 kazem sk. @ kamruzzaman @ kazeman v. state of w.b. 2008 cri lj4474(db-cal) wherein it was held that an omission to mention a fact in the statement under section 161 cr pc cannot be said to be a ..... not to be given primacy. reference is made to the decisions in state of m.p. v. dharkole (2004) 13 scc308 ram swaroop v. state of rajasthan (2008) 13 scc crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 38 of 209 515; and mallappa siddappa alakanur v. state of karnataka (2009) 14 scc748 (viii) ..... 209 pandurang chandrakant mhatre v. state of maharashtra (2009) 10 scc773 md. ankoos v. public prosecutor, high court of a.p. (supra); mukteshwar rai v. state of bihar air1992sc483 state of a.p. v. rayaneedi sitharamaiah (2008) 16 scc179 musakhan v. state of maharashtra (1977) 1 scc733 and ramappa halappa pujar v. state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Kamala & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... for the original complainants/appellants in crl.a.139/2012, submitted as under: (i) the defence has for the first time submitted in this court that the poa act would not be applicable since the incident in question was merely a quarrel between two groups, the members of each of which happened to belong ..... and there dr. dinesh kumar prajapat, medical officer met me and told me that patient tara chand was lying at bed no.6 of the emergency ward. thereafter i proceeded towards bed no.6 dr. dinesh kumar prajapat has given certificate regarding fitness of tara chand to make his statement. thereafter i recorded ..... of assam (2002) 10 scc277and crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 39 of 209 kazem sk. @ kamruzzaman @ kazeman v. state of w.b. 2008 cri lj4474(db-cal) wherein it was held that an omission to mention a fact in the statement under section 161 cr pc cannot be said to be a ..... not to be given primacy. reference is made to the decisions in state of m.p. v. dharkole (2004) 13 scc308 ram swaroop v. state of rajasthan (2008) 13 scc crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 38 of 209 515; and mallappa siddappa alakanur v. state of karnataka (2009) 14 scc748 (viii) ..... 209 pandurang chandrakant mhatre v. state of maharashtra (2009) 10 scc773 md. ankoos v. public prosecutor, high court of a.p. (supra); mukteshwar rai v. state of bihar air1992sc483 state of a.p. v. rayaneedi sitharamaiah (2008) 16 scc179 musakhan v. state of maharashtra (1977) 1 scc733 and ramappa halappa pujar v. state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Karampal vs.the State of Haryana

Court : Delhi

..... for the original complainants/appellants in crl.a.139/2012, submitted as under: (i) the defence has for the first time submitted in this court that the poa act would not be applicable since the incident in question was merely a quarrel between two groups, the members of each of which happened to belong ..... and there dr. dinesh kumar prajapat, medical officer met me and told me that patient tara chand was lying at bed no.6 of the emergency ward. thereafter i proceeded towards bed no.6 dr. dinesh kumar prajapat has given certificate regarding fitness of tara chand to make his statement. thereafter i recorded ..... of assam (2002) 10 scc277and crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 39 of 209 kazem sk. @ kamruzzaman @ kazeman v. state of w.b. 2008 cri lj4474(db-cal) wherein it was held that an omission to mention a fact in the statement under section 161 cr pc cannot be said to be a ..... not to be given primacy. reference is made to the decisions in state of m.p. v. dharkole (2004) 13 scc308 ram swaroop v. state of rajasthan (2008) 13 scc crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 38 of 209 515; and mallappa siddappa alakanur v. state of karnataka (2009) 14 scc748 (viii) ..... 209 pandurang chandrakant mhatre v. state of maharashtra (2009) 10 scc773 md. ankoos v. public prosecutor, high court of a.p. (supra); mukteshwar rai v. state of bihar air1992sc483 state of a.p. v. rayaneedi sitharamaiah (2008) 16 scc179 musakhan v. state of maharashtra (1977) 1 scc733 and ramappa halappa pujar v. state of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //