Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Court: delhi Year: 2017 Page 1 of about 60 results (0.054 seconds)

Feb 17 2017 (HC)

Trf Ltd. Vs.energo Engineering Projects Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-17-2017

..... 2015].; state trading corporation of india limited v. jainsons clothing corporation (1994) 6 scc597 vinitec electronics private limited v. hcl infosystems limited (2008) 1 scc544and the decision of this court dated 6th december, 2016 in arb. p. no.499/2015 in geo miller & co. pvt. ltd. v. bihar urban infrastructure ..... wpos. on 19th april, 2016, trf filed an application being arb.p. no.85/2016 under section 11 of the act. the said petition was dismissed by this court on 19th april, 2016. aggrieved by the said order, trf filed special leave petitions, being slp(c) nos. 14226/ ..... before the at. in the circumstances, it was observed that trf did not have an efficacious remedy under section 17 of the act and therefore, the court had to consider the prayer for interim reliefs on merits and pass an order. the present petitions 20. on remand, the aforementioned ..... and ms. aakashi lodha, advocates. coram: justice s. muralidhar % judgment1702.2017 1. these are five petitions under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 ( act?) filed by trf limited ( trf?) seeking interim reliefs against energo engineering projects limited ( energo?) (respondent no.1) in the circumstances outlined hereunder. background ..... is a trilateral contract which the bank has undertaken to unconditionally and unequivocally abide by the terms of the contract. it is an act of trust with full faith to facilitate free flow of trade and commerce in internal or international trade or business. it creates an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2017 (HC)

Sushil Arora vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2017

..... note that the prosecution had to make out a clear case as to what was the act for which the accused persons had a common intention?.245. in (2008) 17 scc277 nagraja v. state of karnataka, the supreme court has held that the genesis of the crime must be established so far as common intention ..... the report that was prepared in the emergency ward of the hospital. likewise, the death intimation sent to the police was also not produced. the report prepared by the doctor who examined francesco montis ..... wrapping him in a blanket and took him to the hospital. pw6 uma shankar had driven the car and francesco montis was taken to the emergency ward. pw1and other witnesses have stated that on examination of francesco montis, the doctor declared him dead . the prosecution has neither examined the doctor nor produced ..... the mean while information was received vide dd no.17-a, p.s. chanakya puri stating that one person namely ankit s/o unknown r/o35a, ward no.1, mehrauli aged 22 yrs, is admitted with bullet injury at trauma centre, aiims. on this information, inspr. surender rana directed asi nand kishore ..... out that in the subject incident a young person named ankit, son of mr. rajiv minocha, aged about 23 years resident of a house in ward no.4, mehrauli, new delhi had suffered fire arm injuries to which he had succumbed during treatment in the jai prakash narayan apex trauma centre of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2017 (HC)

Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2017

..... is also submitted that the services at delhi international airport are classified under omda whereas services at aai airports are classified in terms of airports economic regulatory authority of india act, 2008 (aera act). w.p.(c) no.11047/2016 page 13 of 41 20. rebutting the contention on behalf of the petitioners that the impugned action of the respondents in excluding the ..... contracting with private parties. (viii) the privatisation of the airports does not mean that the appropriate government cannot be the central government. according to the constitution bench judgment of this court in sail [sail v. national union water front workers, (2001) 7 scc1:2001. scc (l&s) 1121]. , the definition of establishment in clraa takes in its fold purely private undertakings ..... as the authority may deem fit: provided that such lease shall not affect the functions of the authority under section 12 which relates to air traffic service or watch and ward at airports and civil enclaves. (2) no lease under sub-section (1) shall be made without the previous approval of the central government. (3) any money, payable by the ..... ) arrange for postal, money exchange, insurance and telephone facilities for the use of passengers and other persons at the airports and civil enclaves; (i) make appropriate arrangements for watch and ward at the airports and civil enclaves; (j) regulate and control the plying of vehicles, and the entry and exit of passengers and visitors, in the airports and civil enclaves with .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2017 (HC)

Anoop Singh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-12-2017

..... accused. (4) that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of ..... mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra [(1981) 2 scc443:1981. scc (cri) 4 air1981sc1062 .) 137. in yogesh v. state of maharashtra [(2008) 10 scc394: (2009) 1 scc (cri) 51]. this court held: (scc p. 402, para25) in fact crl.rev.p. 262/2016, crl.rev.p. 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & ..... , 1st supplementary charge sheet dated 23.05.2007 came to be filed whereby certain documents including the cfsl report, were filed in the court. thereafter, 2nd supplementary charge sheet dated 18.01.2008 came to be filed, whereby the following persons were also arrayed as accused: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. mr. ..... the decisions in superintendent & remembrancer of legal affairs, west bengal v. anil kumar bhunja, reported as (1979) 4 scc274 palwinder singh v. balwinder singh, reported as (2008) 14 scc504 om wati v. state thr. delhi administration, reported as (2001) 4 scc333 state of m.p. v. s.b. johari, reported as (2000) ..... of evidence and not property . in this behalf, reliance would be placed on the decisions in varsha heera v. state, rendered in crl. rev. pet. 174/2008; sardar singh v. state of haryana, reported as 1977 crl lj1158 s. narasimha kumar & ors. v. state of a.p., reported as 2003 crl lj3188 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2017 (HC)

D. V. Malhotra vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-12-2017

..... accused. (4) that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of ..... mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra [(1981) 2 scc443:1981. scc (cri) 4 air1981sc1062 .) 137. in yogesh v. state of maharashtra [(2008) 10 scc394: (2009) 1 scc (cri) 51]. this court held: (scc p. 402, para25) in fact crl.rev.p. 262/2016, crl.rev.p. 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & ..... , 1st supplementary charge sheet dated 23.05.2007 came to be filed whereby certain documents including the cfsl report, were filed in the court. thereafter, 2nd supplementary charge sheet dated 18.01.2008 came to be filed, whereby the following persons were also arrayed as accused: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. mr. ..... the decisions in superintendent & remembrancer of legal affairs, west bengal v. anil kumar bhunja, reported as (1979) 4 scc274 palwinder singh v. balwinder singh, reported as (2008) 14 scc504 om wati v. state thr. delhi administration, reported as (2001) 4 scc333 state of m.p. v. s.b. johari, reported as (2000) ..... of evidence and not property . in this behalf, reliance would be placed on the decisions in varsha heera v. state, rendered in crl. rev. pet. 174/2008; sardar singh v. state of haryana, reported as 1977 crl lj1158 s. narasimha kumar & ors. v. state of a.p., reported as 2003 crl lj3188 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2017 (HC)

Gopal Ansal vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-12-2017

..... accused. (4) that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of ..... mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra [(1981) 2 scc443:1981. scc (cri) 4 air1981sc1062 .) 137. in yogesh v. state of maharashtra [(2008) 10 scc394: (2009) 1 scc (cri) 51]. this court held: (scc p. 402, para25) in fact crl.rev.p. 262/2016, crl.rev.p. 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & ..... , 1st supplementary charge sheet dated 23.05.2007 came to be filed whereby certain documents including the cfsl report, were filed in the court. thereafter, 2nd supplementary charge sheet dated 18.01.2008 came to be filed, whereby the following persons were also arrayed as accused: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. mr. ..... the decisions in superintendent & remembrancer of legal affairs, west bengal v. anil kumar bhunja, reported as (1979) 4 scc274 palwinder singh v. balwinder singh, reported as (2008) 14 scc504 om wati v. state thr. delhi administration, reported as (2001) 4 scc333 state of m.p. v. s.b. johari, reported as (2000) ..... of evidence and not property . in this behalf, reliance would be placed on the decisions in varsha heera v. state, rendered in crl. rev. pet. 174/2008; sardar singh v. state of haryana, reported as 1977 crl lj1158 s. narasimha kumar & ors. v. state of a.p., reported as 2003 crl lj3188 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2017 (HC)

Sushil Ansal vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-12-2017

..... accused. (4) that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of ..... mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra [(1981) 2 scc443:1981. scc (cri) 4 air1981sc1062 .) 137. in yogesh v. state of maharashtra [(2008) 10 scc394: (2009) 1 scc (cri) 51]. this court held: (scc p. 402, para25) in fact crl.rev.p. 262/2016, crl.rev.p. 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & ..... , 1st supplementary charge sheet dated 23.05.2007 came to be filed whereby certain documents including the cfsl report, were filed in the court. thereafter, 2nd supplementary charge sheet dated 18.01.2008 came to be filed, whereby the following persons were also arrayed as accused: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. mr. ..... the decisions in superintendent & remembrancer of legal affairs, west bengal v. anil kumar bhunja, reported as (1979) 4 scc274 palwinder singh v. balwinder singh, reported as (2008) 14 scc504 om wati v. state thr. delhi administration, reported as (2001) 4 scc333 state of m.p. v. s.b. johari, reported as (2000) ..... of evidence and not property . in this behalf, reliance would be placed on the decisions in varsha heera v. state, rendered in crl. rev. pet. 174/2008; sardar singh v. state of haryana, reported as 1977 crl lj1158 s. narasimha kumar & ors. v. state of a.p., reported as 2003 crl lj3188 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2017 (HC)

Saroj Aggarwal and Anr. Vs.shakuntala Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-27-2017

..... , advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. with the consent of the parties, the matter was heard finally. during the course of hearing, the court had suggested the directions given in the impugned order could be that maintained subject to certain modifications. this was acceptable to both parties. the impugned order is ..... defendant was not granted any permission to construct or complete the finishing of the balance floors and by the order dated 19.03.2015, this court had also directed that the basement, ground and second floors be sealed. the contention that defendant be permitted to occupy the suit property since she ..... till the final disposal of the suit. the defendant shall also not occupy any portion of the suit property without seeking prior permission of this court. so far the order dated 7.4.2011 restraining the defendant from carrying out further construction over the suit property is concerned, it is hereby ..... co- ownership as well as claiming that the suit property was given to her as per the oral family settlement having taken place in the year 2008, as opposed to cs(os) 617/2011 page 6 of 14 what she avers in the written statement that the family settlement took place in ..... defendant had filed an application under order xxxix rule 4 cpc seeking vacation of the said order. after hearing extensive arguments on two occasions, this court passed an order dated 07.01.2013. the relevant extract of the order reads as under:-""26. i have heard learned counsel for the parties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2017 (HC)

Pawan kr.kalra vs.the Registrar General, Delhi High Court & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-17-2017

..... better service record/acr gradings. the acr grading of the candidates found fit for promotion by the selection committee in its meeting held on 04.08.2008, from amongst the private secretaries/administrative officers (judicial)/ court maters, and that of the... petitioner were as follows: s. no name of officer education qualificati- on acr remarks 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 1. ..... creation of a sense of insecurity in the minds of the government servants there would also be administrative complications and difficulties. .. in these circumstances we consider that the high court was wrong in rejecting the preliminary objection raised on behalf of the respondents to the writ petition on the ground of laches. reference may also be made to the decision ..... the post of assistant registrar (selection post) prescribes that the appointment would be made by selection from confirmed officers holding the posts of private secretary, administrative officer (judicial) and court masters, on merit. the relevant extract of schedule-ii reads as under:-"schedule ii s.no.category of post minimum qualifications prescribed for appointment to the posts mode of appointment ..... in the authority cited, the dispute related to inter se seniority of mamlatdars/tehsildars in the newly constituted state of bombay by virtue of the provisions of the states reorganization act, 1956. the inter se seniority of persons holding the same rank has a great bearing at the stage of promotion to a higher post and in such a situation it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2017 (HC)

Court on Its Own Motion vs.vidyanand & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-29-2017

..... the case. the power is exercised and the evidence is examined neither to help the prosecution nor the defence, if the court feels that there is necessity to act in terms of section 311 but only to subserve the cause of justice and public interest. it is done with an object ..... , any indifference, inaction or lethargy shown in protecting his right guaranteed in law will tend to paralyse by such inaction or lethargic action of courts and erode in stages the faith inbuilt in the judicial system ultimately destroying the very justice- delivery system of the country itself. doing justice ..... from the inception of the judicial system it has been accepted that discovery, vindication and establishment of truth are the main purposes underlying existence of courts of justice. the operating principles for a fair trial permeate the common law in both civil and criminal contexts. application of these principles involves a ..... that the witnesses were not present. finally, an order dated 17th may, 2008 was passed directing the matter to be posted on 23rd may, 2008 for orders under section 232 of the cr.p.c. on this date, the court recorded the judgment of acquittal.74. against this judgment, the informant preferred ..... a revision petition being crl.rev.no.919/2008. noting that there was no service report or report of execution of warrant of arrest against .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //