Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Court: delhi Year: 2019 Page 1 of about 49 results (0.081 seconds)

Jan 24 2019 (HC)

M/S C & C Maritime Pte Ltd vs.advance Surfactants India Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2019

..... natural justice infringement of natural ex.p. 311/2014 page 13 15. in national ability s.a. vs. tinna oil & chemicals ltd. & ors., (2008) 105 drj446 this court has also considered and rejected the plea of violation of principles of natural justice in arbitration proceedings with the following observation:-" 27(c) .one cannot be oblivious ..... navin chawla ex.appl.(os) 233/2015 & 607/2015 1. this petition has been filed under section 49 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the act?) seeking enforcement of the arbitral awards dated 19.11.2013 and 21.03.2014 passed by the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen ..... :-"that 27. in our view, what has been stated by this court in renusagar with reference to section 7(1)(b)(ii)of the foreign awards act must equally apply to the ambit and scope of section 48(2)(b) of the 1996 act. in renusagar it has been expressly exposited the expression public policy in ..... wider import than the public policy in section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the foreign awards act. we have no hesitation in holding that renusagar must apply for the purposes of section 48(2)(b) of the 1996 act. insofar as for setting aside an award under section 34 is concerned, the principles laid down ..... section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the foreign awards act refers to the public policy of india. the expression public policy used in section 7(1)(b)(ii) was held to mean public policy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2019 (HC)

Ghulam Mohd. Bhat vs.national Investigating Agency

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-02-2019

..... hon'ble mr. justice brijesh sethi judgment siddharth mridul, j1 the present appeal under section 21(4) of the national investigating agency act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the nia act ) read with section 439 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the cr.p.c. ) assails the ..... the basis of broad probabilities. however, while statute dealing like mcocahaving the provisions contained in sub-section (4) of section 21 of the act, the court may have to probe into the matter deeper so special regard with a to crl.a.1264/2018 page 13 of 23 against collected ..... such as and tada, mcoca and the special enactments the narcotic drugs provisions for bail crl.a.1264/2018 page 10 of 23 the court psychotropic substances act, 1985, is required to record its opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged ..... enunciated that, once charges are framed, it would be safe to assume that a very strong suspicion was founded upon the materials before the court, which prompted the court to form a presumptive opinion as to the existence of the factual ingredients constituting the offence alleged against the accused, to justify the framing ..... against the to justify the framing of charge. in that accused, the accused may have to undertake an situation, arduous task to satisfy the court that despite the framing of charge, the materials presented along with the charge-sheet (report under section 173 crpc), do not make out reasonable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2019 (HC)

Sukumar Chand Jain vs.dda

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-08-2019

..... to the ee raising seven claims amounting to `21,85,000. the dispute was referred to arbitration, on the intervention of this court, under section 11(6) of the act. the preliminary objection to limitation was rejected by the tribunal, which then went on to decide the merits.21. quite apart from ..... ltd., (2006) 11 scc181and renusagar power co. ltd. v. general electric co. 1984 (4) scc679. in mc dermott international (supra), the supreme court clarified the court's inherent limitation by reason of section 34 in such matters:"112. it is trite that the terms of the contract can be express or implied. the ..... learned single judge has re-appreciated evidence and given findings of fact which are outside the purview of section 34 of the act. it is settled law that a court does not sit in appeal over the award of an arbitral tribunal by reassessing or re-appreciating the evidence and the ..... govt of nct s (hereafter called nct ) petition under section 34 to an award dated 17.03.2008 passed by the learned sole arbitrator in the dispute between the parties.20. like in the other two cases, the contract was for execution of works ..... gsc and urged that the learned single judge could not be faulted for following boghara polyfab (supra) and master construction (supra), which are binding on all courts. fao5582012 19. the appellant (hereafter kuber ) challenges the judgment and order of the learned single judge, dated 10.09.2012, which allowed the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2019 (HC)

National Highway Authority of India vs.rayalseema Expressway Private L ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-24-2019

..... , percentage having been picked up from standard data book of morth. it found no infirmity in the award. on a similar reasoning, this court is of the view that tribunal having picked up the percentage for overheads and profits from the standard data book for analysis of rates of ..... profits are taken as 25% and 10% respectively. mr. krishnan is also justified on relying upon the judgment of the division bench of this court in fao (os) 402/2014 national highways authority of india v. hindustan construction company wherein, the division bench has accepted the average overheads for ..... cs-08 provides typical cross section for approach ramps to vup/cup /interchanges/rob. as per clause 2.9 of the 4-laning manual march, 2008, which forms schedule-d of the concession agreement, the claimant / respondent would be permitted to adopt new technologies and materials as per the requirements ..... not a perverse finding of the tribunal. there is no reason for this court to take a different view. more so, noting the position of law, this court, while exercising its power under section 34 of the act does not sit in appeal over the findings by re-assessing and re-appreciating ..... act of 1996 ) by the national highways authority of india is, to an award dated may 02, 2019 whereby the arbitral tribunal has allowed the claims of the respondent herein. omp (comm) 344/2019 page 1 of 58 2. the brief facts, which are necessary for the adjudication of this case is that the petitioner nhai issued a tender in july 2008 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2019 (HC)

Fiberfill Engineers vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-29-2019

..... impose liquidated damage was repelled by the arbitrator. 19.7 iocl had challenged the award by way of a petition filed under section 34 of the 1996 act. this court, inter alia, on the ground that the petitioner had not suffered a loss despite delay on the part of the contractor as found by the learned ..... show me any document, which would establish this aspect of the matter. the only document, which i have been shown is an e-mail dated 15.12.2008 sent by an officer of iocl, which reads as follows: ...this is in continuation to our email dated 24/appended below and the progress report dated ..... therefore, unreasonable.13. in support of her submissions, reliance was placed by ms. narayan on the following judgments: (i) cmdr. s.p. puri vs. alankit assignments ltd., 2008 (3) arblr465(delhi); (ii) associate builders vs. delhi development authority, air2015sc620 (iii) m/s arosan enterprises ltd. vs. union of india and anr., air1999sc3804 omp (comm) ..... by a further period of one year, that is, till 10.1.2009 by iocl. this fact was communicated to ffe by iocl vide letter dated 5.2.2008. by this time, it appears, only six (6) call-up orders were placed upon ffe covering thirty (30) sites. what is also not in dispute, ..... types at retail outlets in the state of tamil nadu and pondicherry. 7.1 the tenure of the contract was one year, that is, till 10.1.2008. 7.2 the engagement of ffe was on the rate contract basis. the tenure of the contract was extendable, albeit, with mutual consent by a further .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Dev Sharma vs.indo Tibetan Border Police & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Ranbir Singh Saini and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Ranjit Singh Dalpatia vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Sunil Kumar vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Raghuvir Singh Raghave vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //