Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Court: karnataka Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.052 seconds)

Mar 31 2009 (HC)

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2009

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

..... nor even the need for conserving rare plant species and animal species in existence in the notified areas. in fact the affidavit placed before the court on 11-1-2008, the affidavit of the present commissioner and director of mines and geology, department of mines and geology sri k.s prabhakara, while does ..... state government as to whether it is a fair and non-arbitrary action and as to whether it is in consonance with the act and the rules, nevertheless, this court cannot help but to observe that the applications of the aspirants for grant of mining leases having not been treated in a fair ..... upon the state government to exhibit due awareness of this fact and to take into consideration all the requisite aspects from the context of the conservation acts, protection acts and then to embark upon the issue of notification. it is also necessary on the part of the state government to weigh the competing interest ..... regulate non-forest activities in forest areas and to conserve forests by declaring them as reserved and such is the avowed object in the state act, forest [conservation] act, 1980 seeks to provide a better safeguard for the retention and protection of the forest and to minimize the scope for diversion of forest ..... that in the exercise of this power and jurisdiction, as to the manner in which the judge is expected to act.103. the present writ petition is a matter before this court and which is being heard for a considerable length of time. an order that that is required to be passed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2009 (HC)

Presteege Property Developers Rept. by Its Managaing Partner Mr. Deepa ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-02-2009

..... registered as on the date of the suit for the relief of infringement though it could be material against passing off in a court having jurisdiction. in the case of mfa no. 13696/2008 even though class-16 is pleaded and allegation of brochure of defendant is made, the ultimate grievance is against the business itself. ..... trade mark though in the said case the issue related to the jurisdiction in view of section 62(2) of the copy rights act, 1957. in that context, the hon'ble supreme court is of the view that cause of action will arise only when a registered trade mark is used and not when an application ..... held in premier distilleries case the cause must precede the action and not follow it. in fact the hon'ble supreme court in the case of k. narayanan and ors. v. s. murali : air 2008 sc 3216 has also held that there is no right in the person to assert infringement before registration is granted. this ..... a decision in the case of indian hotels company ltd. and anr. v. jiva institute of vedic science and culture : 2008 (37) ptc 468 (del.) rendered by a hon'ble division bench of high court of delhi, this aspect has been adverted to and in a situation where the parties had registration in class -16 and an ..... and the right under the act if invoked, even then, since the suit under the act is in the nature of passing off, even in that event, a composite suit is not maintainable as held by the hon'ble supreme court in the case of dabur india ltd. v. k.r. industries : air 2008 sc 3123 relied on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //