Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Court: orissa Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.041 seconds)

Jul 31 2009 (HC)

Footpath Khyudra Byabasai Sangha Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-31-2009

Reported in : 108(2009)CLT241

..... dated 07.02.2005 and 14.02.2005 were in force, opposite parties 3 and 5 in clear violation of the order of this court on 24.02.2008 forcibly demolished the structures and evicted the members of the petitioner-society from the plots where they were having their shops. the opposite ..... in general administration department wherein it was stated that unauthori-zed encroachments, are liable to be evicted under the public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) act, 1972. in the said order it was further.stated that as the plots in question are used by thousands dwellers and those are busiest roads ..... constructing the kiosk in question over the case land. bhubaneswar municipal corporation is a nodal agency for maintenance of public road and orissa municipal corporation act empowers bhubaneswar municipal corporation under section 407 to evict encroachers from the public roads. the case land being a part of the public road is ..... is erected or set up on or upon or over any street or any open channel, drain or well or tank. section 408 of the said act requires the commissioner to give a written notice to the owner-or occupier of any premises, wall, fence, rail, post step, booth or other ..... and cabin owners every day at the rate of rs.1 per shop since 1983 in accordance with section 307 of the orissa municipal act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'act 1950).there were 161 shopkeepers dealing in readymade garments, small betel shops, plastic goods shops, leather bag shops and other daily utility .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2009 (HC)

Padma Charana Behera Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-03-2009

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2585

..... genuineness or otherwise of allegations made in the fir or complaint and the extraordinary and inherent powers of court do not confer an arbitrary jurisdiction on the court to act according to its whims or caprice. however, the court, under its inherent powers, can neither intervene at an uncalled for stage nor it can 'soft- ..... rare exceptional case, but where the allegations on the face of the complaint do not constitute an offence, criminal proceedings may be unhesitantly quashed. the court held as follows:exercise of jurisdiction under the inherent power as envisaged in section 482 of the code to have the complaint or the charge-sheet ..... disclosing the offence.(emphasis added)19. in sarjudas v. state of gujarat : 1999 (8) scc 508 : 2000 cri lj 509 the hon'ble supreme court held that there must be cogent evidence of mala fides or malicious intention of the informant or the complainant for taking note of the allegations of mala fide ..... . anil kumar agarwal : (2007)7 scc 373 : 2007 cri lj 3735; didigam bikshapathi v. state of andhra pradesh : (2008) 2 scc 403 : 2008 cri lj 724 and sunita jain v. pawan kumar jain : (2008)2 scc 705.8. in pepsi foods ltd. v. special judicial magistrate : air 1998 sc 128 : 1998 cri lj 1 ..... a similar issue was considered and the hon'ble apex court held that the criminal law cannot be set into motion as a matter .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //