Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Court: supreme court of india Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.084 seconds)

Jan 11 2016 (SC)

M/S Sciemed Overseas Inc. Vs. Boc India Limited and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-11-2016

..... to be preserved and protected and at the same time the filing of irresponsible statements without any regard to accuracy has to be discouraged. it was observed by this court as follows: courts are entrusted with the powers of dispensation and adjudication of justice of the rival claims of the parties besides determining the criminal liability of the offenders for offences committed ..... line for oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and compressed air, etc. the work was to be executed on a turnkey basis within 150 days in the 1000 bedded departments and wards of the rims.5. responses to the notice inviting tender were submitted by the petitioner (sciemed overseas) and respondent no.1 (boc india). their tenders were processed by the rims ..... against the society. the courts are further expected to do justice quickly and impartially not being biased by any extraneous considerations. justice dispensation system would be wrecked if statutory restrictions are not imposed upon ..... learned single judge of the high court. by an order dated 14th may, 2008, the learned single judge dismissed the writ petition. while disposing of the writ petition, it was held that though the decision making process by which sciemed was declared to be qualified was improper, it could not be held that the rims had acted in an arbitrary, mala fide or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2016 (SC)

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2016

..... on entry of goods into local areas act, 2008 to be unconstitutional and void. the punjab and haryana high court invalidated the haryana act, the matters again came to this court in a connected matter being jaiprakash associates[7].(a two judge bench) referred ten questions to the constitutional bench.[8]. one ..... of trade and commerce and violated articles 301 and 304 of the constitution of india. on april 16, 2008, the state of haryana repealed the 2000 act and enacted the haryana tax on entry of goods into local areas act, 2008, impugned in this appeal. the high court in indian oil corporation v. state of haryana[6]., declared that the provisions of the haryana tax ..... intercourse.93. in ramjilal s case (supra), a petition under article 32 of the constitution was filed before this court by the petitioner who was carrying on business in the state of nabha. with the merger of nabha into the state of pepsu, the petitioner was required by the assessing authority to file return and pay income tax for the income earned ..... by him during the previous years. aggrieved, the petitioner challenged the proceedings inter alia on the ground that the assessment of tax for previous year violated his right guaranteed under article 14. this court repelled the contention founded .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2016 (SC)

M/S Electrothem (India) Ltd. Vs. Patel Vipulkumar Ramjibhai and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-02-2016

..... ) ltd. .appellant versus patel vipulkumar ramjibhai & ors. . respondents judgment uday umesh lalit, j.leave granted. this appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 11.05.2012 passed by the high court of gujarat allowing special civil application no.5986/2010 setting aside the environmental clearance dated 27.01.2010 and directing that the operations of the entire plant of the appellant ..... granted and that the activities of the appellant were periodically and regularly being monitored to ensure that stipulated environmental safeguards were complied with.10. after hearing rival submissions, the high court by its judgment and order dated 11.5.2012 allowed special civil application no.5986 of 2010 principally on the ground that the environmental clearance dated 27.1.2010 was ..... , transfer points, loading and unloading areas. total water requirement from gujarat water infrastructure ltd. (gwil) will be 2,165 m3/day. pas submitted the water allotment letter dated 22nd october, 2008 from gwil. air-cooled condenser will be provided to whrb. the waste water from power plant will be treated in neutralization plant. treated waste water will be used for water ..... .01.1994 issued by the central government in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section(1) and clause v of sub-section(2) of section 3 of the environment (protection) act, 1986 read with clause(d) of sub-rule(2) of rule 5 of the environment (protection) rules, 1986 stipulated inter alia that in case of expansion or modernization of any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2016 (SC)

Pepsico India Holding P.Ltd. Vs. Grocery Market and Shops Board and Or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-12-2016

..... this appeal, the fact situation is that the appellant company is manufacturing soft drinks being aerated water and bottled water. a state government order dated 18.8.2008 made under section 5 of the act rendered the following finding:- 5. the government has perused all the case papers and considered the above circumstances. after examining all the aspects of the case the ..... also referred in some detail to bhuwalka steel industries limited v. bombay iron & steel labour board, (2010) 2 scc273to buttress his proposition that this court, following the full bench of the bombay high court, has construed the 1969 act as a welfare legislation, and having regard to its object has expressly stated that employers should realise their social obligations qua this segment of ..... worker who is engaged or to be engaged in any scheduled employment, irrespective of whether or not he is protected by other labour legislations. this court referred to the objects and reasons for the 1969 act in the following terms: the statement of objects and reasons mentions that report was made by the committee to the government on 17.11.1967. in ..... the maxim contemporanea expositio could be invoked in construing the word telegraph line in the act. (at 156,157) 28. we thus find that the high court was absolutely correct in not interfering with the state government order dated 18.8.2008 and in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant company. for the same reasons given in civil appeal no.10000 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2016 (SC)

State of H.P and Ors Vs. Rajesh Chander Sood Etc Etc

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-28-2016

..... . therefore the classification does not stand the test of article 14. on the same proposition, reliance was placed on union of india v. sps vains (retd.), (2008) 9 scc125 and the court s attention was invited to the following observations:- 28. the question regarding creation of different classes within the same cadre on the basis of the doctrine of intelligible ..... pension under the 1999 scheme could have been legally denied, is when a succeeding pension scheme introduced by the employer, postulated better retiral benefits.39. reliance was also placed on pepsu road transport corporation, patiala v. mangal singh, (2011) 11 scc702 wherein it has been held as under:- 48. the concept of pension has also been considered in corpus ..... if the state government, in exercise of its rule- making power, amended the building rules and imposed restrictions on the heights of buildings on g.t. road and other wards, such settled expectation has been rendered impossible of fulfillment due to change in law. the claim based on the alleged vested right or settled expectation cannot be set up against ..... ). the regional provident fund commissioner accordingly, through his communication dated 23.2.2000, advised the concerned corporate bodies, to continue to comply with the provisions of the provident fund act, in respect of all their employees. the above communication of the regional provident fund commissioner, was superseded by another, dated 11.9.2001, addressed by the additional central provident .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2016 (SC)

Union of India and Ors. Vs. M/S. Cipla Ltd. and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-21-2016

..... the implementation of the notification fixing the prices. we consider that such orders are against the public interest and ought not to be made by a court unless the court is satisfied that no public interest is going to be served. in matters of fixation of price, it is the interest of the consumer public ..... the ceiling price of formulations from the bulk drug norfloxacin was fixed under paragraph 9 of the dpco1995 this notification was also challenged in the high court. the high court found no merit in the writ petitions and dismissed them.19. the primary submission made before us by learned counsel appearing on behalf of dr. ..... the central government were subject to revision under the provisions of the dpco1995but the manufacturers/formulators did not take recourse to these provisions and instead approached the courts after much delay and by way of an after-thought. these submissions were refuted by the learned counsel appearing for cipla and other manufacturers/formulators. judicial ..... of royalty. no doubt, any arbitrary action taken by the state would be subject to scrutiny by the courts because arbitrariness is the very antithesis of rule of law. but this does not mean that this court would act as an appellate authority over the determination of rates of royalty by the government .. it is open to ..... [48]. (1999) 8 scc525[49]. [50]. (2013) 15 scc790[51]. [52]. (1998) 5 scc310[53]. [54]. (2007) 6 scc769[55]. [56]. (2014) 16 scc501[57]. [58]. (2008) 1 scc560[59]. [60]. (2016) 5 scc80 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2016 (SC)

Idbi Trusteeship Services Ltd. Vs. Hubtown Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-15-2016

..... 's distillery co. is summarised on p. 266 of the annual practice (1962 edn.) in the following terms: the principle on which the court acts is that where the defendant can show by affidavit that there is a bona fide triable issue, he is to be allowed to defend as to ..... 4 scc736at para 10; uma shankar kamal narain v. m.d. overseas ltd., (2007) 4 scc133at paras 8 and 9; sify ltd. v. first flight couriers ltd., (2008) 4 scc246at para 10; wada arun asbestos (p) ltd. v. gujarat water supply & sewerage board, (2009) 2 scc432at para 19; r. saravana prabhu v. videocon leasing ..... secure repayment/return of the fdi amount invested along with a fixed rate of return thereon i.e. for seeking the active assistance of this court to implement/effectuate/enforce a transaction prohibited by the fdi policy and the fema regulations. the contractual documents (ssa & dtd) establish that it ..... genuine or sham or whether it raises a triable issue or not, the court may impose conditions in granting leave to defend. [para 13].16. in southern sales & services v. sauermilch design & handels gmbh, (2008) 14 scc457 this court was squarely asked to render its decision on whether the judgment in mechelec ..... s case was to a large extent rendered ineffective in view of the amended o.xxxvii. this court found: having considered the submissions made on behalf of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2016 (SC)

Ravindra Ramchandra Waghmare Vs. Indore Mun.Corp. and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-29-2016

..... inasmuch as any evasion whether substantial or insignificant came within its ambit as well as within the purview of section 34 of the indian income tax act. this court has observed that it is open to the state to make the classification to determine who should be regarded as a class for the purpose of ..... the district judge. the provisions of section 212 were questioned on the ground that they were violative of section 299 of the government of india act, 1935. this court has laid down that sections 216 and 389 provide for indemnification for the loss caused to be made to the owner of the property or other ..... area is published and comes into operation, a draft development scheme cannot be published by the development authority under section 50(2) of the act of 1973. this court observed that the area in question with respect to which the scheme had been framed under section 50 had not been properly included in the ..... the part of owner. there is conscious omission as to the power of the corporation to remove or enter which cannot be supplied by the court. municipal authorities have to act within the confine of the powers conferred upon them. they cannot commit trespass. thus without acquisition of the land under section 278 or 279, ..... kept 60 meters. on 26.5.2007 a notice was issued for demolition of certain structure for the purpose of widening of road. on 1.1.2008 master plan, 2021 had been notified in which ab road has been proposed as 60 to 75 meters. it was also pointed out that now a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //