Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Page 11 of about 918 results (0.073 seconds)

Feb 08 2017 (HC)

Sushil Arora vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... note that the prosecution had to make out a clear case as to what was the act for which the accused persons had a common intention?.245. in (2008) 17 scc277 nagraja v. state of karnataka, the supreme court has held that the genesis of the crime must be established so far as common intention ..... the report that was prepared in the emergency ward of the hospital. likewise, the death intimation sent to the police was also not produced. the report prepared by the doctor who examined francesco montis ..... wrapping him in a blanket and took him to the hospital. pw6 uma shankar had driven the car and francesco montis was taken to the emergency ward. pw1and other witnesses have stated that on examination of francesco montis, the doctor declared him dead . the prosecution has neither examined the doctor nor produced ..... the mean while information was received vide dd no.17-a, p.s. chanakya puri stating that one person namely ankit s/o unknown r/o35a, ward no.1, mehrauli aged 22 yrs, is admitted with bullet injury at trauma centre, aiims. on this information, inspr. surender rana directed asi nand kishore ..... out that in the subject incident a young person named ankit, son of mr. rajiv minocha, aged about 23 years resident of a house in ward no.4, mehrauli, new delhi had suffered fire arm injuries to which he had succumbed during treatment in the jai prakash narayan apex trauma centre of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

State Through Cbi vs.sajjan Kumar & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... 293. in considering a situation where there was no evidence of any express agreement between the accused to do or cause to be done an illegal act, the supreme court, in mohammad usman mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra (1981) 2 scc443 opined that for an offence under section 120b, the prosecution need ..... prosecutor, closure report was prepared and filed before the metropolitan crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 87 of 203 magistrate, patiala house courts, new delhi on 31-7-2008. it is further seen that before accepting the closure report, the magistrate issued summons to the complainant i.e. smt jagdish kaur number of ..... not re examine him. it may be recalled that even in the last status report filed by the riot cell (ex. dw15c) dated 31.07.2008 there is a reference to an affidavit of jasbir singh showing the involvement of sajjan kumar apparently this affidavit was filed before the ranganath mishra commission in ..... i.e. the statement dated 23rd may 2006 recorded by the cbi under section 161 cr pc (ex.pw-1/da), the statement dated 10th december 2008 recorded by the mm under section 164 cr pc (ex.pw-1/e), the supplementary statement dated 4th september 2009 (ex.pw-1/db), and the ..... report was sent to her but she did not file any protest petition. the closure report was finally accepted by the learned mm on 31st july 2008.106. mr. sibal submitted that the fir was re-registered with the cbi on 22nd november 2005 whereas the aforementioned closure report was filed on 14th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

Balwan Khokhar vs.cbi

Court : Delhi

..... 293. in considering a situation where there was no evidence of any express agreement between the accused to do or cause to be done an illegal act, the supreme court, in mohammad usman mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra (1981) 2 scc443 opined that for an offence under section 120b, the prosecution need ..... prosecutor, closure report was prepared and filed before the metropolitan crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 87 of 203 magistrate, patiala house courts, new delhi on 31-7-2008. it is further seen that before accepting the closure report, the magistrate issued summons to the complainant i.e. smt jagdish kaur number of ..... not re examine him. it may be recalled that even in the last status report filed by the riot cell (ex. dw15c) dated 31.07.2008 there is a reference to an affidavit of jasbir singh showing the involvement of sajjan kumar apparently this affidavit was filed before the ranganath mishra commission in ..... i.e. the statement dated 23rd may 2006 recorded by the cbi under section 161 cr pc (ex.pw-1/da), the statement dated 10th december 2008 recorded by the mm under section 164 cr pc (ex.pw-1/e), the supplementary statement dated 4th september 2009 (ex.pw-1/db), and the ..... report was sent to her but she did not file any protest petition. the closure report was finally accepted by the learned mm on 31st july 2008.106. mr. sibal submitted that the fir was re-registered with the cbi on 22nd november 2005 whereas the aforementioned closure report was filed on 14th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... 293. in considering a situation where there was no evidence of any express agreement between the accused to do or cause to be done an illegal act, the supreme court, in mohammad usman mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra (1981) 2 scc443 opined that for an offence under section 120b, the prosecution need ..... prosecutor, closure report was prepared and filed before the metropolitan crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 87 of 203 magistrate, patiala house courts, new delhi on 31-7-2008. it is further seen that before accepting the closure report, the magistrate issued summons to the complainant i.e. smt jagdish kaur number of ..... not re examine him. it may be recalled that even in the last status report filed by the riot cell (ex. dw15c) dated 31.07.2008 there is a reference to an affidavit of jasbir singh showing the involvement of sajjan kumar apparently this affidavit was filed before the ranganath mishra commission in ..... i.e. the statement dated 23rd may 2006 recorded by the cbi under section 161 cr pc (ex.pw-1/da), the statement dated 10th december 2008 recorded by the mm under section 164 cr pc (ex.pw-1/e), the supplementary statement dated 4th september 2009 (ex.pw-1/db), and the ..... report was sent to her but she did not file any protest petition. the closure report was finally accepted by the learned mm on 31st july 2008.106. mr. sibal submitted that the fir was re-registered with the cbi on 22nd november 2005 whereas the aforementioned closure report was filed on 14th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

Capt. Bhagmal Retd. Vs.cbi

Court : Delhi

..... 293. in considering a situation where there was no evidence of any express agreement between the accused to do or cause to be done an illegal act, the supreme court, in mohammad usman mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra (1981) 2 scc443 opined that for an offence under section 120b, the prosecution need ..... prosecutor, closure report was prepared and filed before the metropolitan crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 87 of 203 magistrate, patiala house courts, new delhi on 31-7-2008. it is further seen that before accepting the closure report, the magistrate issued summons to the complainant i.e. smt jagdish kaur number of ..... not re examine him. it may be recalled that even in the last status report filed by the riot cell (ex. dw15c) dated 31.07.2008 there is a reference to an affidavit of jasbir singh showing the involvement of sajjan kumar apparently this affidavit was filed before the ranganath mishra commission in ..... i.e. the statement dated 23rd may 2006 recorded by the cbi under section 161 cr pc (ex.pw-1/da), the statement dated 10th december 2008 recorded by the mm under section 164 cr pc (ex.pw-1/e), the supplementary statement dated 4th september 2009 (ex.pw-1/db), and the ..... report was sent to her but she did not file any protest petition. the closure report was finally accepted by the learned mm on 31st july 2008.106. mr. sibal submitted that the fir was re-registered with the cbi on 22nd november 2005 whereas the aforementioned closure report was filed on 14th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

Girdhari Lal vs.state Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

..... 293. in considering a situation where there was no evidence of any express agreement between the accused to do or cause to be done an illegal act, the supreme court, in mohammad usman mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra (1981) 2 scc443 opined that for an offence under section 120b, the prosecution need ..... prosecutor, closure report was prepared and filed before the metropolitan crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 87 of 203 magistrate, patiala house courts, new delhi on 31-7-2008. it is further seen that before accepting the closure report, the magistrate issued summons to the complainant i.e. smt jagdish kaur number of ..... not re examine him. it may be recalled that even in the last status report filed by the riot cell (ex. dw15c) dated 31.07.2008 there is a reference to an affidavit of jasbir singh showing the involvement of sajjan kumar apparently this affidavit was filed before the ranganath mishra commission in ..... i.e. the statement dated 23rd may 2006 recorded by the cbi under section 161 cr pc (ex.pw-1/da), the statement dated 10th december 2008 recorded by the mm under section 164 cr pc (ex.pw-1/e), the supplementary statement dated 4th september 2009 (ex.pw-1/db), and the ..... report was sent to her but she did not file any protest petition. the closure report was finally accepted by the learned mm on 31st july 2008.106. mr. sibal submitted that the fir was re-registered with the cbi on 22nd november 2005 whereas the aforementioned closure report was filed on 14th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

Krishan Khokar vs.c B I

Court : Delhi

..... 293. in considering a situation where there was no evidence of any express agreement between the accused to do or cause to be done an illegal act, the supreme court, in mohammad usman mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra (1981) 2 scc443 opined that for an offence under section 120b, the prosecution need ..... prosecutor, closure report was prepared and filed before the metropolitan crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 87 of 203 magistrate, patiala house courts, new delhi on 31-7-2008. it is further seen that before accepting the closure report, the magistrate issued summons to the complainant i.e. smt jagdish kaur number of ..... not re examine him. it may be recalled that even in the last status report filed by the riot cell (ex. dw15c) dated 31.07.2008 there is a reference to an affidavit of jasbir singh showing the involvement of sajjan kumar apparently this affidavit was filed before the ranganath mishra commission in ..... i.e. the statement dated 23rd may 2006 recorded by the cbi under section 161 cr pc (ex.pw-1/da), the statement dated 10th december 2008 recorded by the mm under section 164 cr pc (ex.pw-1/e), the supplementary statement dated 4th september 2009 (ex.pw-1/db), and the ..... report was sent to her but she did not file any protest petition. the closure report was finally accepted by the learned mm on 31st july 2008.106. mr. sibal submitted that the fir was re-registered with the cbi on 22nd november 2005 whereas the aforementioned closure report was filed on 14th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2015 (HC)

Nilam Katara Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... room for twenty six days thereby enabling him to avoid the prison. crl.a.nos.910, 741, 958/2008, crl.rev.p.no.369/2008, crl.a.nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 416 564. this court had directed information with regard to private ward hospitalization of other prisoners in aiims. in this regard, in para 8 of the affidavit dated 21st march, 2012 ..... system for delayed compounding.442. have costs been contemplated under the criminal justice system in india?. we find that in a case under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, the supreme court of india in the order dated 3rd may, 2010 disposing of criminal appeal no.963/2010 [arising out of slp(crl.)no.6369/2007]., damodar s. prabhu v. sayed ..... in the absence of an appeal against the inadequacy of sentence under section 377, goswami j.characterised that question as an unmerited doubt on the undoubted jurisdiction of the high court in acting suo motu in criminal revision in appropriate cases and said "the attempt has to be nipped in the bud."dealing with that question, he observed as follows: (scc pp ..... and 641 imperilling the safety of a multitude of peoples' representatives, constitutional functionaries and officials of government of india and engaging into a combat with security forces is a terrorist act of gravest severity.6. nature of the evidence sr. mitigating factors aggravating no.factors in cases of circumstantial evidence the guilt, not being established beyond reasonable doubts, a lenient view .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2015 (HC)

State Vs. Vikas Yadav and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... room for twenty six days thereby enabling him to avoid the prison. crl.a.nos.910, 741, 958/2008, crl.rev.p.no.369/2008, crl.a.nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 416 564. this court had directed information with regard to private ward hospitalization of other prisoners in aiims. in this regard, in para 8 of the affidavit dated 21st march, 2012 ..... system for delayed compounding.442. have costs been contemplated under the criminal justice system in india?. we find that in a case under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, the supreme court of india in the order dated 3rd may, 2010 disposing of criminal appeal no.963/2010 [arising out of slp(crl.)no.6369/2007]., damodar s. prabhu v. sayed ..... in the absence of an appeal against the inadequacy of sentence under section 377, goswami j.characterised that question as an unmerited doubt on the undoubted jurisdiction of the high court in acting suo motu in criminal revision in appropriate cases and said "the attempt has to be nipped in the bud."dealing with that question, he observed as follows: (scc pp ..... and 641 imperilling the safety of a multitude of peoples' representatives, constitutional functionaries and officials of government of india and engaging into a combat with security forces is a terrorist act of gravest severity.6. nature of the evidence sr. mitigating factors aggravating no.factors in cases of circumstantial evidence the guilt, not being established beyond reasonable doubts, a lenient view .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2015 (HC)

Vishal Yadav Vs. State Govt. of Up

Court : Delhi

..... room for twenty six days thereby enabling him to avoid the prison. crl.a.nos.910, 741, 958/2008, crl.rev.p.no.369/2008, crl.a.nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 416 564. this court had directed information with regard to private ward hospitalization of other prisoners in aiims. in this regard, in para 8 of the affidavit dated 21st march, 2012 ..... system for delayed compounding.442. have costs been contemplated under the criminal justice system in india?. we find that in a case under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, the supreme court of india in the order dated 3rd may, 2010 disposing of criminal appeal no.963/2010 [arising out of slp(crl.)no.6369/2007]., damodar s. prabhu v. sayed ..... in the absence of an appeal against the inadequacy of sentence under section 377, goswami j.characterised that question as an unmerited doubt on the undoubted jurisdiction of the high court in acting suo motu in criminal revision in appropriate cases and said "the attempt has to be nipped in the bud."dealing with that question, he observed as follows: (scc pp ..... and 641 imperilling the safety of a multitude of peoples' representatives, constitutional functionaries and officials of government of india and engaging into a combat with security forces is a terrorist act of gravest severity.6. nature of the evidence sr. mitigating factors aggravating no.factors in cases of circumstantial evidence the guilt, not being established beyond reasonable doubts, a lenient view .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //