Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Sorted by: old Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.055 seconds)

Aug 08 1997 (HC)

Bhartiya Construction Co. Vs. Chairman, Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-08-1997

Reported in : 1997VAD(Delhi)883; 1997(2)ARBLR369(Delhi); 68(1997)DLT520; 1997(42)DRJ768

..... respect of such delay'. i shall have to deal with this case again when i consider the scope of the jurisdiction of this court under section 30 of the arbitration act, 1940. (11) the learned counsel for the contractor mr. d.p. sharma relied upon the passage in hudson's building ..... this was an aspect not urged before or considered by, the arbitrators. there was no evidence before the arbitrators or material adduced before the court as to the nature of these operations. it is difficult to say, by merely reading the terms of contract that the arbitrators have erroneously ..... the learned judge distinguished the judgment of the supreme court in food corporation of india vs . joginderpal mohinderpal and anr. : [1989]1scr880 . the learned judge also referred to clause 10 of the agreement which is ..... this account. the learned judge referred to the judgment reported in government of kerala and another vs . v.p. jolly : air1992ker187 , a decision of this court in suit no. 2185 of 1987 decided on 20th july 1990 in continental construction co. ltd. vs . state of madhya pradesh : [1988]3scr103 . ..... cannot be accepted. the public authority like dda is expected to act in accordance with the contract and having failed to act cannot project the case without mentioning the facts completely in the objection petition which alone can make the court to appreciate the position. i am unable to accept the arguments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1997 (HC)

Samyuktha Karnataka Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-20-1997

Reported in : [1998]110STC226(Kar)

..... . c. jain's case : (1981)illj402sc , the board cannot be held to be a local authority. 58. under somewhat similar statutory provisions contained in the haryana housing board act, 1971, the supreme court in the case of housing board of haryana : (1996)illj833sc has held that the housing board constituted therein is not a local authority. similarly, in another case, namely, calcutta ..... control or management of the fund must vest in the authority.' 51. keeping in view the aforesaid test as laid down by the supreme court, we would like to examine the provisions of the industrial areas act to ascertain as to whether the industrial area development board which is constituted under section 6 thereof fulfills the essential characteristics of a local authority ..... for levy and collection of tax under the provisions of the karnataka tax on entry of goods act, 1979 (hereinafter in short 'the act') filed individual writ petitions before this court challenging three notifications issued by the state government purporting to be under section 3 of the act, providing for rate of tax on the goods brought by them as raw materials in their ..... is whether the requirement of laying the notification before the state legislature as envisaged under section 31 of the act is mandatory. to substantiate the proposition, the counsel for the appellants placed reliance on a judgment of the division bench of this court in the case of lipton india ltd. v. state of karnataka : ilr1994kar1848 . at page 242 of stc (page .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //