Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Sorted by: old Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.079 seconds)

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Chitradurga District Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Bhadra Sahakari Sakkare Karkhan ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ300Kant

..... under article 226 may now be examined. it is argued that the management of the college being a trust registered under the bombay public trust act is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the high court. the contention in other words, is that the trust is a private institution against which no writ of mandamus can be issued. in support of ..... is an established procedure to remedy a wrong or enforce a right. a party may not be allowed to bypass the normal channel of civil and criminal litigation. the high court does not act like a proverbial 'bull in a china shop' in the exercise of its jurisdiction under article 226.'11. a three-judge bench of the supreme ..... is not maintainable in order to defeat the legitimate rights of the workmen under the settlement. we say this, because, the workmen acting on the solemn promise of the management withdrew industrial disputes instituted by them before the labour court, hubli, and the resultant position is that they are neither here nor there and they are now placed in 'trishanku swarga' and ..... mete out justice in given facts. on finding that either the workmen were engaged in violation of the provisions of the act or were continued as contract labour, despite prohibition of the contract labour under section 10(1), the high court has, by judicial review as the basic structure, constitutional duty to enforce the law by appropriate directions. the right to judicial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2003 (SC)

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Saw Pipes Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-2003

Reported in : AIR2003SC2629; 2003(3)ALD82(SC); 2003(2)ARBLR5(SC); (2003)3CompLJ1(SC); [2003(4)JCR148(SC)]; JT2003(4)SC171; 2003(4)SCALE92; (2003)5SCC705; [2003]44SCL89(SC); [2003]3SCR691

..... and any violation of the said provisions would be contrary to the public policy of india as envisaged in section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the act.'18. this court in murlidhar agarwal and anr. v. state of u.p. and ors. : [1975]1scr575 while dealing with the concept of 'public policy' observed ..... with statutes in other countries, though i wish that the indian law had a provision similar to section 68 of the english arbitration act, 1996 which gives power to the court to correct errors of law in the award. i welcome your view on the need for giving the doctrine of 'public policy' ..... in harish chandra bajpai v. trilok singh : [1957]1scr370 , while dealing with sections 90 and 92 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (as it stood), this court observed thus:--'it is then argued that section 92 confers powers on the tribunal in respect of certain matters, while section 90(2) applies ..... is a stipulation in the nature of penalty for forfeiture of an amount deposited pursuant to the terms of contract which expressly provides for forfeiture, the court has jurisdiction to award such sum only as it considers reasonable, but not exceeding the amount specified in the contract as liable to forfeiture.'47. from ..... finality to the award and resolving the dispute by speedier method would be much more frustrated by permitting patently illegal award to operate. patently illegal ward is required to be set at naught, otherwise it would promote injustice.30. therefore, in our view, the phrase 'public policy of india .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //