Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Year: 1959

Nov 04 1959 (HC)

Pearl Insurance Co. Vs. Atma Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-04-1959

Reported in : AIR1960P& H236

..... j. had to consider whether a letters patent appeal lay under section 52 of pepsu ordinance no. x of 2005 bk against the decision of a single judge passed in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction of the high court.the section as it stood did not make any exception in case of judgment, ..... in certain respects.(14) the learned counsel for the appellant company has relied on the equally well established rule that where the language of an act is clear and explicit, it must be given effect to whatever the consequences may be. the intention has to be gathered from the language ..... co. ltd., (1957) 59 pun lr 1: (s) air 1956 sc 614). the following observations are pertinent:'now, the displaced persons (debts adjustment) act is one of the statutory measure meant for relief and rehabilitation of the displaced person. it is meant for a temporary situation brought about by unprecedented circumstances. ..... the special circumstances in which they had been (sic) intention appears to dominate to the entire subsequent legislation which has been referred to.now the act has been enacted for the relief of a class of persons called the displaced persons and the object was a remedial and beneficial one. the ..... argument addressed but the terms used in an insurance contract must be interpreted with reference to the object and the exigencies of insurance.the learned acting chief justice then proceeded to observe that the parties had agreed in substances that if no suit were brought within a year then neither .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //