Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.057 seconds)

Sep 17 1986 (HC)

Sarwan Singh Dardi Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-17-1986

Reported in : AIR1987P& H81

..... in part i or part ii of the register maintained under the fast punjab ayurvedic and unani practitioner us act 1949 or the pepsu ayurvedic and unani practitioners act, 2008 bk. before the commencement of 1963 act were also deemed to be registered in part i of the register envisaged under section 14 by virtue of the ..... state government. like annexure p: 2 in the case before, and. therefore, the accused in that case: did not have even a semblance of case that court warrant his acquittal. we, therefore, overrule the ratio in phool singh's case (supra). to the extent indicated above.34. for the reasons aforementioned, we ..... in view of the provisions of sub-sec (9) of r. 65.33. the petitioner, however, placed strong reliance on the singh bench decision of this court rendered in criminal revn. no. 1617 of 1984, phool singh v. state of haryana annexure p. 3 decided on 20-9-1985. reported in (1986) ..... medicines to a registered medical practitioner who is registered in a state other than punjab? this court held that it was not necessary that the buyer registered medical practitioner should have been registered in the state of punjab to be entitled to buy drugs ..... indian system of medicine and. therefore. the petitioner was not entitled to sell medicines to him. the only narrow question that came up for consideration before the court in that petition was whether sub-clause (ii) of clause (ee) of r. 2, read with r. 65(9), prohibited sale of the given .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //