Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Year: 2017 Page 1 of about 78 results (0.067 seconds)

Oct 11 2017 (SC)

Independent Thought Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-2017

..... years. the position as on date is that under the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012, juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, child marriage restraint act, 1929, protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, the majority act, 1875, the guardians and wards act, 1890, the indian contract act, 1872 w.p. (c) no.382 of 2013 page 87 and many other legislations, a ..... an intoxicating drug is consumed by the public. while upholding the view of 23 (1986) 3 scc38524 (1984) 1 scc22225 (2008) 3 scc1w.p. (c) no.382 of 2013 page 53 the delhi high court striking down the provision as unconstitutional, this court held in paragraphs 46 and 47 of the report: it is to be borne in mind that legislations with pronounced ..... s principles of statutory interpretation, 9th edn., 2004, p. 497...... 56. in subramanian swamy v. director, cbi49, a constitution bench of this court laid down the following principle:48. (2008) 4 scc72049 (2014) 8 scc682w.p. (c) no.382 of 2013 page 104 court s approach 49. where there is challenge to the constitutional validity of a law enacted by the legislature, the ..... court must keep in view that there is always a presumption of constitutionality of an enactment, and a clear transgression of constitutional principles must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2017 (SC)

Nidhi Kaim and Anr. Vs. State of M P and Ors Etc

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-13-2017

..... and legal resources, in a given case, was the foundation for invocation of article 142. learned counsel ventured to clarify, that in doing complete justice, whilst a court would not act in disregard to binding provisions of law, the said restraint was applicable only with reference to an available statutory regime/scheme. thus viewed, whenever there was an ..... were not successful in gaining admission to prestigious courses (- or, in acclaimed institutions). and therefore it was highlighted, that parents also derived great pleasure and satisfaction, when their wards gained admission to important courses, and/or in prestigious institutions. children as also parents, therefore, strive for societal recognition, when they compete for admission to professional courses. it ..... not, this vitiated process of obtaining admission to the mbbs course, was adopted during the year 2007, and prior thereto, is not known. because, mbbs admissions prior to 2008, were not investigated. investigation was initiated in the first instance, with reference to admissions, for the year 2013. thereafter, investigation was extended to those, who had gained admission ..... for the preceding years, as well. this led to the cancellation of the admission of the appellants (and others, similarly situated as them), in respect of admissions during 2008 to 2012. it was submitted, that the present controversy, should be viewed from the aforestated background (and perspective).39. it was emphasized, by learned counsel, that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2017 (SC)

Venture Global Engineering Llc Vs. Tech Mahindra Ltd &Amp; Anr Etc

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-01-2017

..... by a reported judgment in venture global engineering vs. satyam computer services ltd. & anr., (2008) 4 scc190(hereinafter referred to as venture-i ). this court, inter alia, held that: (i) venture was entitled to challenge the award in indian courts as the provisions of part i of aac act will apply to the award in the light of law laid down in bhatia international ..... ) be set aside in exercise of the power under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the aac act ). o.s. no.87 of 2012 was transferred to the court of chief judge, city civil court, hyderabad and re-numbered as o.p. no.390 of 2008.4. by order dated 31.01.2012, o.p. no.390 of ..... in venture-i, the ist additional chief judge, city civil court, secunderabad transferred o.s. no.80 of 2006 to the court of 2nd additional chief judge city 7 civil court at hyderabad. the suit was converted into an application under section 34 of the act and was renumbered o.p. no.390 of 2008. the suit/o.p. as originally filed was based on ..... venture i, the ist addl. chief judge, city civil court, secunderabad transferred o.s. no.80 of 2006 to the court of 2nd additional chief judge, city civil court of hyderabad. the suit was then converted into an application under section 34 of the act and was renumbered as o.p. no.390/2008.35. on 07.01.2009, b. ramalinga raju-chairman 19 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2017 (SC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Selvi J. Jayalalitha and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-14-2017

..... residence of a2 to a4 did not warrant an inference thereof and though as this offence contemplates an agreement between two or more persons to commit an unlawful act, a court to be satisfied with regard thereto ought to have at its disposal prima facie evidence. it observed that where evidence is only circumstantial, it must be complete ..... .sasikala | | | | | | |land and building at|30-12-1988|tmt. n. sasikala|5,85,420 |i |15 | | | | | | | | |abishekapuram |sale deed | | | | | |village, ponnagar, | | | | | | |trichy in plot | | | | | | |no.102, 3rd cross | | | | | | |road, new ward, | | | | | | |no.k, block | | | | | | |no.30, t.s.no.107, | | | | | | |totally | | | | | | |measuring 3525 sq ft| | | | | | |purchased from | | | | | | |mirasi of 22a, | | | | | | |william road, | | | | | | |contonment trichy, | | | | | | |cash balance ..... . in refutation, learned senior counsel appearing for a1 submitted that the trial court wrongly excluded from consideration the income tax assessment orders in favour of the accused by relying upon the judgment of high court of patna in state of bihar vs. lalu prasad & anr., (2008) crl.l.j.2433, which, according to him, is clearly inapplicable ..... since the order passed by the patna high court was in the nature of an interlocutory order. he further stated that while .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2017 (HC)

Trf Ltd. Vs.energo Engineering Projects Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-17-2017

..... 2015].; state trading corporation of india limited v. jainsons clothing corporation (1994) 6 scc597 vinitec electronics private limited v. hcl infosystems limited (2008) 1 scc544and the decision of this court dated 6th december, 2016 in arb. p. no.499/2015 in geo miller & co. pvt. ltd. v. bihar urban infrastructure ..... wpos. on 19th april, 2016, trf filed an application being arb.p. no.85/2016 under section 11 of the act. the said petition was dismissed by this court on 19th april, 2016. aggrieved by the said order, trf filed special leave petitions, being slp(c) nos. 14226/ ..... before the at. in the circumstances, it was observed that trf did not have an efficacious remedy under section 17 of the act and therefore, the court had to consider the prayer for interim reliefs on merits and pass an order. the present petitions 20. on remand, the aforementioned ..... and ms. aakashi lodha, advocates. coram: justice s. muralidhar % judgment1702.2017 1. these are five petitions under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 ( act?) filed by trf limited ( trf?) seeking interim reliefs against energo engineering projects limited ( energo?) (respondent no.1) in the circumstances outlined hereunder. background ..... is a trilateral contract which the bank has undertaken to unconditionally and unequivocally abide by the terms of the contract. it is an act of trust with full faith to facilitate free flow of trade and commerce in internal or international trade or business. it creates an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2017 (HC)

Sushil Arora vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2017

..... note that the prosecution had to make out a clear case as to what was the act for which the accused persons had a common intention?.245. in (2008) 17 scc277 nagraja v. state of karnataka, the supreme court has held that the genesis of the crime must be established so far as common intention ..... the report that was prepared in the emergency ward of the hospital. likewise, the death intimation sent to the police was also not produced. the report prepared by the doctor who examined francesco montis ..... wrapping him in a blanket and took him to the hospital. pw6 uma shankar had driven the car and francesco montis was taken to the emergency ward. pw1and other witnesses have stated that on examination of francesco montis, the doctor declared him dead . the prosecution has neither examined the doctor nor produced ..... the mean while information was received vide dd no.17-a, p.s. chanakya puri stating that one person namely ankit s/o unknown r/o35a, ward no.1, mehrauli aged 22 yrs, is admitted with bullet injury at trauma centre, aiims. on this information, inspr. surender rana directed asi nand kishore ..... out that in the subject incident a young person named ankit, son of mr. rajiv minocha, aged about 23 years resident of a house in ward no.4, mehrauli, new delhi had suffered fire arm injuries to which he had succumbed during treatment in the jai prakash narayan apex trauma centre of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2017 (HC)

Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2017

..... is also submitted that the services at delhi international airport are classified under omda whereas services at aai airports are classified in terms of airports economic regulatory authority of india act, 2008 (aera act). w.p.(c) no.11047/2016 page 13 of 41 20. rebutting the contention on behalf of the petitioners that the impugned action of the respondents in excluding the ..... contracting with private parties. (viii) the privatisation of the airports does not mean that the appropriate government cannot be the central government. according to the constitution bench judgment of this court in sail [sail v. national union water front workers, (2001) 7 scc1:2001. scc (l&s) 1121]. , the definition of establishment in clraa takes in its fold purely private undertakings ..... as the authority may deem fit: provided that such lease shall not affect the functions of the authority under section 12 which relates to air traffic service or watch and ward at airports and civil enclaves. (2) no lease under sub-section (1) shall be made without the previous approval of the central government. (3) any money, payable by the ..... ) arrange for postal, money exchange, insurance and telephone facilities for the use of passengers and other persons at the airports and civil enclaves; (i) make appropriate arrangements for watch and ward at the airports and civil enclaves; (j) regulate and control the plying of vehicles, and the entry and exit of passengers and visitors, in the airports and civil enclaves with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2017 (HC)

Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Lmj International Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-22-2017

..... reached, the invocation of arbitration clause is void ab initio. in this regard, the learned senior counsel has referred to an unreported decision of a single bench of this court in ap112of 2008 [waidhan engineering & industries private limited vs. the board of trustees for the port of kolkata]. decided on 5th may, 2010. the fourth objection is that even if it is ..... a domestic award would not touch the award on this ground. in any event, such grounds of challenge are not coming within the purview of section 48 of the act. the court unhesitatingly accepts the submission of mr. bose that the english cases at this stage are academic as the tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the award-holder seller is ..... available for setting aside of the domestic award under section 34 are not the same public policy grounds . mentioned under section 48 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. mr. bose has requested this court to consider the fundamental and preliminary objections before considering the merits of the matter. it is submitted that the contract is a fob contract. the fundamental basis ..... on :22. d august, 2017. soumen sen, j.:- the judgment-debtor is the applicant. the judgment-debtor has filed this application ostensibly under section 48 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 but essentially for having a second look at the foreign award, notwithstanding an earlier order dated 4th september, 2014, by which the question of maintainability including enforceability of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2017 (HC)

Anoop Singh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-12-2017

..... accused. (4) that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of ..... mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra [(1981) 2 scc443:1981. scc (cri) 4 air1981sc1062 .) 137. in yogesh v. state of maharashtra [(2008) 10 scc394: (2009) 1 scc (cri) 51]. this court held: (scc p. 402, para25) in fact crl.rev.p. 262/2016, crl.rev.p. 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & ..... , 1st supplementary charge sheet dated 23.05.2007 came to be filed whereby certain documents including the cfsl report, were filed in the court. thereafter, 2nd supplementary charge sheet dated 18.01.2008 came to be filed, whereby the following persons were also arrayed as accused: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. mr. ..... the decisions in superintendent & remembrancer of legal affairs, west bengal v. anil kumar bhunja, reported as (1979) 4 scc274 palwinder singh v. balwinder singh, reported as (2008) 14 scc504 om wati v. state thr. delhi administration, reported as (2001) 4 scc333 state of m.p. v. s.b. johari, reported as (2000) ..... of evidence and not property . in this behalf, reliance would be placed on the decisions in varsha heera v. state, rendered in crl. rev. pet. 174/2008; sardar singh v. state of haryana, reported as 1977 crl lj1158 s. narasimha kumar & ors. v. state of a.p., reported as 2003 crl lj3188 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2017 (HC)

D. V. Malhotra vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-12-2017

..... accused. (4) that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of ..... mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra [(1981) 2 scc443:1981. scc (cri) 4 air1981sc1062 .) 137. in yogesh v. state of maharashtra [(2008) 10 scc394: (2009) 1 scc (cri) 51]. this court held: (scc p. 402, para25) in fact crl.rev.p. 262/2016, crl.rev.p. 263/2016, crl.rev.p. 264/2016 & ..... , 1st supplementary charge sheet dated 23.05.2007 came to be filed whereby certain documents including the cfsl report, were filed in the court. thereafter, 2nd supplementary charge sheet dated 18.01.2008 came to be filed, whereby the following persons were also arrayed as accused: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. mr. ..... the decisions in superintendent & remembrancer of legal affairs, west bengal v. anil kumar bhunja, reported as (1979) 4 scc274 palwinder singh v. balwinder singh, reported as (2008) 14 scc504 om wati v. state thr. delhi administration, reported as (2001) 4 scc333 state of m.p. v. s.b. johari, reported as (2000) ..... of evidence and not property . in this behalf, reliance would be placed on the decisions in varsha heera v. state, rendered in crl. rev. pet. 174/2008; sardar singh v. state of haryana, reported as 1977 crl lj1158 s. narasimha kumar & ors. v. state of a.p., reported as 2003 crl lj3188 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //