Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Year: 2018 Page 2 of about 72 results (0.062 seconds)

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

Capt. Bhagmal Retd. Vs.cbi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-17-2018

..... 293. in considering a situation where there was no evidence of any express agreement between the accused to do or cause to be done an illegal act, the supreme court, in mohammad usman mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra (1981) 2 scc443 opined that for an offence under section 120b, the prosecution need ..... prosecutor, closure report was prepared and filed before the metropolitan crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 87 of 203 magistrate, patiala house courts, new delhi on 31-7-2008. it is further seen that before accepting the closure report, the magistrate issued summons to the complainant i.e. smt jagdish kaur number of ..... not re examine him. it may be recalled that even in the last status report filed by the riot cell (ex. dw15c) dated 31.07.2008 there is a reference to an affidavit of jasbir singh showing the involvement of sajjan kumar apparently this affidavit was filed before the ranganath mishra commission in ..... i.e. the statement dated 23rd may 2006 recorded by the cbi under section 161 cr pc (ex.pw-1/da), the statement dated 10th december 2008 recorded by the mm under section 164 cr pc (ex.pw-1/e), the supplementary statement dated 4th september 2009 (ex.pw-1/db), and the ..... report was sent to her but she did not file any protest petition. the closure report was finally accepted by the learned mm on 31st july 2008.106. mr. sibal submitted that the fir was re-registered with the cbi on 22nd november 2005 whereas the aforementioned closure report was filed on 14th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

Girdhari Lal vs.state Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-17-2018

..... 293. in considering a situation where there was no evidence of any express agreement between the accused to do or cause to be done an illegal act, the supreme court, in mohammad usman mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra (1981) 2 scc443 opined that for an offence under section 120b, the prosecution need ..... prosecutor, closure report was prepared and filed before the metropolitan crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 87 of 203 magistrate, patiala house courts, new delhi on 31-7-2008. it is further seen that before accepting the closure report, the magistrate issued summons to the complainant i.e. smt jagdish kaur number of ..... not re examine him. it may be recalled that even in the last status report filed by the riot cell (ex. dw15c) dated 31.07.2008 there is a reference to an affidavit of jasbir singh showing the involvement of sajjan kumar apparently this affidavit was filed before the ranganath mishra commission in ..... i.e. the statement dated 23rd may 2006 recorded by the cbi under section 161 cr pc (ex.pw-1/da), the statement dated 10th december 2008 recorded by the mm under section 164 cr pc (ex.pw-1/e), the supplementary statement dated 4th september 2009 (ex.pw-1/db), and the ..... report was sent to her but she did not file any protest petition. the closure report was finally accepted by the learned mm on 31st july 2008.106. mr. sibal submitted that the fir was re-registered with the cbi on 22nd november 2005 whereas the aforementioned closure report was filed on 14th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

Krishan Khokar vs.c B I

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-17-2018

..... 293. in considering a situation where there was no evidence of any express agreement between the accused to do or cause to be done an illegal act, the supreme court, in mohammad usman mohammad hussain maniyar v. state of maharashtra (1981) 2 scc443 opined that for an offence under section 120b, the prosecution need ..... prosecutor, closure report was prepared and filed before the metropolitan crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 87 of 203 magistrate, patiala house courts, new delhi on 31-7-2008. it is further seen that before accepting the closure report, the magistrate issued summons to the complainant i.e. smt jagdish kaur number of ..... not re examine him. it may be recalled that even in the last status report filed by the riot cell (ex. dw15c) dated 31.07.2008 there is a reference to an affidavit of jasbir singh showing the involvement of sajjan kumar apparently this affidavit was filed before the ranganath mishra commission in ..... i.e. the statement dated 23rd may 2006 recorded by the cbi under section 161 cr pc (ex.pw-1/da), the statement dated 10th december 2008 recorded by the mm under section 164 cr pc (ex.pw-1/e), the supplementary statement dated 4th september 2009 (ex.pw-1/db), and the ..... report was sent to her but she did not file any protest petition. the closure report was finally accepted by the learned mm on 31st july 2008.106. mr. sibal submitted that the fir was re-registered with the cbi on 22nd november 2005 whereas the aforementioned closure report was filed on 14th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2018 (HC)

Parsoli Motors Works Private Limited vs.bmw India Private Litmited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-15-2018

..... established. bona fide justification, for the action impugned, is an absolute defence, to a plea of legitimate expectation.80. in jitender kumar v. state of haryana, (2008) 2 scc161 the supreme court observed thus, regarding the doctrine of legitimate expectation (in para 58 of the report): ?a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as an anticipation. it is distinct ..... any discretionary relief?. in dr. kumar das v. indian medical practitioner pharma store ltd., (2007) 95 drj618 it was held that ?section 9 of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 empowers this court to pass such order as are necessary to preserve the subject matter of the arbitration?. in respect of sub clause (c) of the clause (ii) section 9 (i) ..... of balance of convenience, too, therefore, no case for grant of injunction was made out. (xiii) sections 91 and 92 of the indian evidence act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as ?the evidence act?) forebore the court from reading, into the contract, what was not contained therein. there was no question, therefore, of reading, into the agreement between the petitioner and respondent ..... ags was, therefore, held to suffer from an error of law apparent from the face of the award and consequently, unsustainable. for ready reference, section 14 of the specific relief act may be reproduced thus: ?14. contracts not specifically enforceable. the following contracts cannot be specifically (1) enforced, namely:-"contract for (a) the non-performance of which compensation in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2018 (HC)

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2018

..... c22082015, 2209/ 2015 & 3480/2015 page 46 of 142 be drawn on the basis of those materials to conclude the complaint to be unacceptable. the court should not act on annexures to the petitions under section 482 of the cr.p.c., which cannot be termed as evidence without being tested and proved .58. reliance ..... 01.12.1982, state of a.p. vs. gourishetty mahesh and ors. criminal appeal no.1252 of 2010 (arising out of the slp (crl.) no.3061 of 2008) decided on 15.07.2010, r.p. kapur v. state of punjabmanu/sc/0086/19 1960crilj1239 , state of uttar pradesh v. r.k. srivastava manu/sc/ ..... exercise of inherent powers under section 482. 104. vide the guidelines laid down by the hon ble apex court in som mittal vs. government of karnataka, criminal appeal no.206 of 2008 decided on 21.02.2008, a consideration of the scope and ambit of the power under section 482 of the criminal procedure code, 1973 as ..... derogation crl.m.c22082015, 2209/ 2015 & 3480/2015 page 40 of 142 of the prohibition of smoking in public places rules, 2008, under section 4 of cigarette and other tobacco products act- 2003 (cotpa). as per the charge-sheet no health trade license was granted to the hotel for the terrace area adjoining the ..... criminal appeal no.1252 of 2010 (arising out of the slp (crl.) no.3061 of 2008) decided on 15.07.2010 to the effect : - 12) while exercising jurisdiction under section 482 of the code, the high court would not ordinarily embark upon an enquiry whether the evidence in question is reliable or not or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2018 (HC)

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

..... the ridge area. it was clearly directed that therefore, it could not be utilized in any manner in view of the prohibitions contained in the forest (conservation) act, 1980. it was held by the court that in these circumstances, the issuance of the notification was merely a simple formality to secure the area. the lt. governor of delhi was consequently requested to ..... , both in providing raw materials and in assimilating by-product wastes due to consumption. the largesse of technology can only postpone or disguise the inevitable. improving forever, the professor barbara ward has written of this ecological imperative in particularly vivid language: w.p.(c)no.365/2017 & fao(os)no.200/2017 page 83 of 95 we can forget moral imperatives ..... at 2016 (4) karlj626: manu/ka/0877/2016, n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors. in this pronouncement, reference has been made to the supreme court pronouncement reported at (2008) 17 scc491 bachhaj nahar v. nilima mandal & anr., holding that with regard to an easement of prescription, the plaintiff is required to plead and prove that he was in peaceful, ..... of state v. nagorao tanko deshmukh, air1938nag 415; chapasibhai dhanjibhai danad v. purushottam, air1971sc1878 n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors., 2016 (3) akr86 bachhaj nahar v. nilima mandal & anr., (2008) 17 scc491and laxman v. tukia & ors., air1918nag 166. we have carefully examined these judgments.138. in the judgment reported at air1938nag 415, secretary of state v. nagorao tanko deshmukh, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2018 (HC)

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

..... the ridge area. it was clearly directed that therefore, it could not be utilized in any manner in view of the prohibitions contained in the forest (conservation) act, 1980. it was held by the court that in these circumstances, the issuance of the notification was merely a simple formality to secure the area. the lt. governor of delhi was consequently requested to ..... , both in providing raw materials and in assimilating by-product wastes due to consumption. the largesse of technology can only postpone or disguise the inevitable. improving forever, the professor barbara ward has written of this ecological imperative in particularly vivid language: w.p.(c)no.365/2017 & fao(os)no.200/2017 page 83 of 95 we can forget moral imperatives ..... at 2016 (4) karlj626: manu/ka/0877/2016, n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors. in this pronouncement, reference has been made to the supreme court pronouncement reported at (2008) 17 scc491 bachhaj nahar v. nilima mandal & anr., holding that with regard to an easement of prescription, the plaintiff is required to plead and prove that he was in peaceful, ..... of state v. nagorao tanko deshmukh, air1938nag 415; chapasibhai dhanjibhai danad v. purushottam, air1971sc1878 n. vijendra rao v. vasudeva pal & ors., 2016 (3) akr86 bachhaj nahar v. nilima mandal & anr., (2008) 17 scc491and laxman v. tukia & ors., air1918nag 166. we have carefully examined these judgments.138. in the judgment reported at air1938nag 415, secretary of state v. nagorao tanko deshmukh, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Kulwinder vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-24-2018

..... for the original complainants/appellants in crl.a.139/2012, submitted as under: (i) the defence has for the first time submitted in this court that the poa act would not be applicable since the incident in question was merely a quarrel between two groups, the members of each of which happened to belong ..... and there dr. dinesh kumar prajapat, medical officer met me and told me that patient tara chand was lying at bed no.6 of the emergency ward. thereafter i proceeded towards bed no.6 dr. dinesh kumar prajapat has given certificate regarding fitness of tara chand to make his statement. thereafter i recorded ..... of assam (2002) 10 scc277and crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 39 of 209 kazem sk. @ kamruzzaman @ kazeman v. state of w.b. 2008 cri lj4474(db-cal) wherein it was held that an omission to mention a fact in the statement under section 161 cr pc cannot be said to be a ..... not to be given primacy. reference is made to the decisions in state of m.p. v. dharkole (2004) 13 scc308 ram swaroop v. state of rajasthan (2008) 13 scc crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 38 of 209 515; and mallappa siddappa alakanur v. state of karnataka (2009) 14 scc748 (viii) ..... 209 pandurang chandrakant mhatre v. state of maharashtra (2009) 10 scc773 md. ankoos v. public prosecutor, high court of a.p. (supra); mukteshwar rai v. state of bihar air1992sc483 state of a.p. v. rayaneedi sitharamaiah (2008) 16 scc179 musakhan v. state of maharashtra (1977) 1 scc733 and ramappa halappa pujar v. state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Kamala & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-24-2018

..... for the original complainants/appellants in crl.a.139/2012, submitted as under: (i) the defence has for the first time submitted in this court that the poa act would not be applicable since the incident in question was merely a quarrel between two groups, the members of each of which happened to belong ..... and there dr. dinesh kumar prajapat, medical officer met me and told me that patient tara chand was lying at bed no.6 of the emergency ward. thereafter i proceeded towards bed no.6 dr. dinesh kumar prajapat has given certificate regarding fitness of tara chand to make his statement. thereafter i recorded ..... of assam (2002) 10 scc277and crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 39 of 209 kazem sk. @ kamruzzaman @ kazeman v. state of w.b. 2008 cri lj4474(db-cal) wherein it was held that an omission to mention a fact in the statement under section 161 cr pc cannot be said to be a ..... not to be given primacy. reference is made to the decisions in state of m.p. v. dharkole (2004) 13 scc308 ram swaroop v. state of rajasthan (2008) 13 scc crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 38 of 209 515; and mallappa siddappa alakanur v. state of karnataka (2009) 14 scc748 (viii) ..... 209 pandurang chandrakant mhatre v. state of maharashtra (2009) 10 scc773 md. ankoos v. public prosecutor, high court of a.p. (supra); mukteshwar rai v. state of bihar air1992sc483 state of a.p. v. rayaneedi sitharamaiah (2008) 16 scc179 musakhan v. state of maharashtra (1977) 1 scc733 and ramappa halappa pujar v. state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Karampal vs.the State of Haryana

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-24-2018

..... for the original complainants/appellants in crl.a.139/2012, submitted as under: (i) the defence has for the first time submitted in this court that the poa act would not be applicable since the incident in question was merely a quarrel between two groups, the members of each of which happened to belong ..... and there dr. dinesh kumar prajapat, medical officer met me and told me that patient tara chand was lying at bed no.6 of the emergency ward. thereafter i proceeded towards bed no.6 dr. dinesh kumar prajapat has given certificate regarding fitness of tara chand to make his statement. thereafter i recorded ..... of assam (2002) 10 scc277and crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 39 of 209 kazem sk. @ kamruzzaman @ kazeman v. state of w.b. 2008 cri lj4474(db-cal) wherein it was held that an omission to mention a fact in the statement under section 161 cr pc cannot be said to be a ..... not to be given primacy. reference is made to the decisions in state of m.p. v. dharkole (2004) 13 scc308 ram swaroop v. state of rajasthan (2008) 13 scc crl.a. 129/2012 & connected matters page 38 of 209 515; and mallappa siddappa alakanur v. state of karnataka (2009) 14 scc748 (viii) ..... 209 pandurang chandrakant mhatre v. state of maharashtra (2009) 10 scc773 md. ankoos v. public prosecutor, high court of a.p. (supra); mukteshwar rai v. state of bihar air1992sc483 state of a.p. v. rayaneedi sitharamaiah (2008) 16 scc179 musakhan v. state of maharashtra (1977) 1 scc733 and ramappa halappa pujar v. state of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //