Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Year: 2018 Page 6 of about 72 results (0.057 seconds)

Jun 25 2018 (HC)

Pr Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Softbrands India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-25-2018

..... like in the case of vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the high court under section 260-a of the act, the courts could have date of judgment 25-06-2018 i.t.a.no.536/2015 c/w i.t.a.no.537/2015 pr. ..... as perverse. it is not allowed to either of the parties, i.e. the assessee or the revenue to invoke the jurisdiction of this court under section 260-a of the act merely because the tribunal comes to reverse or modify the findings given by the lower authority, viz. transfer pricing officer (tpo) or dispute resolution ..... the arm s length price ; [ii]. the scheme of procedure of assessment and appeals to the tribunal and high court/supreme court. [iii]. the scope of interference by high court under section 260-a of the act in these type of cases. findings of the tribunal:12. we find it appropriate to quote some portions of the ..... software products. ld dr brought our attention to the details under the head inventories and mentioned that work in progress is nil for the period ending march, 2008; but the fact is that there are no segment details relating to software products out of the segmental information under the head application in software . considering ..... on the decision of the hon ble bench of the itat, delhi in the case of sony india (p) ltd. reported in 2008-tiol-439-itat- delhi dt. 23.12.2008. the learned counsel for the assessee drew our attention to para 115.3 of the order wherein the tribunal has held that we are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Kailash Gahlot & Ors. Vs.election Commission of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2018

..... is that whether the decision by the legal authority or person would determine question affecting rights of the subjects and whether it was the duty of the authority to act judicially. supreme court in indian national congress (i) versus institute of social welfare and others, air2002sc2158 has observed and laid down certain principles to determine whether function of the authority was ..... of the parliamentary secretary. thus, the state legislative assemblies do not have competence to create posts of officers of state legislature.99. opinion also refers to judgments of the high courts in banomali behera versus markanda mahapatra, air1961orissa 205, laljibhai jodhabhai bar versus vinodchandra jethalal patel, air1963guj 297 and aires rodrigues versus state of goa, (2009) supp bom cr16 100. ..... into consideration facts and circumstances, but the procedure followed must be sound, fair and just.48. eci has, along with the written submissions, filed a list of reference cases from 2008 onwards where no hearing or hearing was given. in most of the cases, it was stated that no hearing was given. the said list was also handed over in the ..... upon. hearing of the parties, application of mind, and recording of reasons for decision were basic elements which must be complied with. in babloo pasi versus state of jharkhand, (2008) 13 scc133 reference was made to principle of audi alteram partem that no party shall be condemned unheard. in the context of juvenile justice (care and protection of children .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Rajesh Rishi & Anr. Vs.election Commission of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2018

..... is that whether the decision by the legal authority or person would determine question affecting rights of the subjects and whether it was the duty of the authority to act judicially. supreme court in indian national congress (i) versus institute of social welfare and others, air2002sc2158 has observed and laid down certain principles to determine whether function of the authority was ..... of the parliamentary secretary. thus, the state legislative assemblies do not have competence to create posts of officers of state legislature.99. opinion also refers to judgments of the high courts in banomali behera versus markanda mahapatra, air1961orissa 205, laljibhai jodhabhai bar versus vinodchandra jethalal patel, air1963guj 297 and aires rodrigues versus state of goa, (2009) supp bom cr16 100. ..... into consideration facts and circumstances, but the procedure followed must be sound, fair and just.48. eci has, along with the written submissions, filed a list of reference cases from 2008 onwards where no hearing or hearing was given. in most of the cases, it was stated that no hearing was given. the said list was also handed over in the ..... upon. hearing of the parties, application of mind, and recording of reasons for decision were basic elements which must be complied with. in babloo pasi versus state of jharkhand, (2008) 13 scc133 reference was made to principle of audi alteram partem that no party shall be condemned unheard. in the context of juvenile justice (care and protection of children .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Alka Lamba vs.union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2018

..... is that whether the decision by the legal authority or person would determine question affecting rights of the subjects and whether it was the duty of the authority to act judicially. supreme court in indian national congress (i) versus institute of social welfare and others, air2002sc2158 has observed and laid down certain principles to determine whether function of the authority was ..... of the parliamentary secretary. thus, the state legislative assemblies do not have competence to create posts of officers of state legislature.99. opinion also refers to judgments of the high courts in banomali behera versus markanda mahapatra, air1961orissa 205, laljibhai jodhabhai bar versus vinodchandra jethalal patel, air1963guj 297 and aires rodrigues versus state of goa, (2009) supp bom cr16 100. ..... into consideration facts and circumstances, but the procedure followed must be sound, fair and just.48. eci has, along with the written submissions, filed a list of reference cases from 2008 onwards where no hearing or hearing was given. in most of the cases, it was stated that no hearing was given. the said list was also handed over in the ..... upon. hearing of the parties, application of mind, and recording of reasons for decision were basic elements which must be complied with. in babloo pasi versus state of jharkhand, (2008) 13 scc133 reference was made to principle of audi alteram partem that no party shall be condemned unheard. in the context of juvenile justice (care and protection of children .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Naresh Yadav vs.union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2018

..... is that whether the decision by the legal authority or person would determine question affecting rights of the subjects and whether it was the duty of the authority to act judicially. supreme court in indian national congress (i) versus institute of social welfare and others, air2002sc2158 has observed and laid down certain principles to determine whether function of the authority was ..... of the parliamentary secretary. thus, the state legislative assemblies do not have competence to create posts of officers of state legislature.99. opinion also refers to judgments of the high courts in banomali behera versus markanda mahapatra, air1961orissa 205, laljibhai jodhabhai bar versus vinodchandra jethalal patel, air1963guj 297 and aires rodrigues versus state of goa, (2009) supp bom cr16 100. ..... into consideration facts and circumstances, but the procedure followed must be sound, fair and just.48. eci has, along with the written submissions, filed a list of reference cases from 2008 onwards where no hearing or hearing was given. in most of the cases, it was stated that no hearing was given. the said list was also handed over in the ..... upon. hearing of the parties, application of mind, and recording of reasons for decision were basic elements which must be complied with. in babloo pasi versus state of jharkhand, (2008) 13 scc133 reference was made to principle of audi alteram partem that no party shall be condemned unheard. in the context of juvenile justice (care and protection of children .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Shri Adarsh Shastri and Ors. Vs.election Commission of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2018

..... is that whether the decision by the legal authority or person would determine question affecting rights of the subjects and whether it was the duty of the authority to act judicially. supreme court in indian national congress (i) versus institute of social welfare and others, air2002sc2158 has observed and laid down certain principles to determine whether function of the authority was ..... of the parliamentary secretary. thus, the state legislative assemblies do not have competence to create posts of officers of state legislature.99. opinion also refers to judgments of the high courts in banomali behera versus markanda mahapatra, air1961orissa 205, laljibhai jodhabhai bar versus vinodchandra jethalal patel, air1963guj 297 and aires rodrigues versus state of goa, (2009) supp bom cr16 100. ..... into consideration facts and circumstances, but the procedure followed must be sound, fair and just.48. eci has, along with the written submissions, filed a list of reference cases from 2008 onwards where no hearing or hearing was given. in most of the cases, it was stated that no hearing was given. the said list was also handed over in the ..... upon. hearing of the parties, application of mind, and recording of reasons for decision were basic elements which must be complied with. in babloo pasi versus state of jharkhand, (2008) 13 scc133 reference was made to principle of audi alteram partem that no party shall be condemned unheard. in the context of juvenile justice (care and protection of children .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Sanjeev Jha vs.union of India, Ministry of Law & Justice & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2018

..... is that whether the decision by the legal authority or person would determine question affecting rights of the subjects and whether it was the duty of the authority to act judicially. supreme court in indian national congress (i) versus institute of social welfare and others, air2002sc2158 has observed and laid down certain principles to determine whether function of the authority was ..... of the parliamentary secretary. thus, the state legislative assemblies do not have competence to create posts of officers of state legislature.99. opinion also refers to judgments of the high courts in banomali behera versus markanda mahapatra, air1961orissa 205, laljibhai jodhabhai bar versus vinodchandra jethalal patel, air1963guj 297 and aires rodrigues versus state of goa, (2009) supp bom cr16 100. ..... into consideration facts and circumstances, but the procedure followed must be sound, fair and just.48. eci has, along with the written submissions, filed a list of reference cases from 2008 onwards where no hearing or hearing was given. in most of the cases, it was stated that no hearing was given. the said list was also handed over in the ..... upon. hearing of the parties, application of mind, and recording of reasons for decision were basic elements which must be complied with. in babloo pasi versus state of jharkhand, (2008) 13 scc133 reference was made to principle of audi alteram partem that no party shall be condemned unheard. in the context of juvenile justice (care and protection of children .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

Rajesh Gupta vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2018

..... is that whether the decision by the legal authority or person would determine question affecting rights of the subjects and whether it was the duty of the authority to act judicially. supreme court in indian national congress (i) versus institute of social welfare and others, air2002sc2158 has observed and laid down certain principles to determine whether function of the authority was ..... of the parliamentary secretary. thus, the state legislative assemblies do not have competence to create posts of officers of state legislature.99. opinion also refers to judgments of the high courts in banomali behera versus markanda mahapatra, air1961orissa 205, laljibhai jodhabhai bar versus vinodchandra jethalal patel, air1963guj 297 and aires rodrigues versus state of goa, (2009) supp bom cr16 100. ..... into consideration facts and circumstances, but the procedure followed must be sound, fair and just.48. eci has, along with the written submissions, filed a list of reference cases from 2008 onwards where no hearing or hearing was given. in most of the cases, it was stated that no hearing was given. the said list was also handed over in the ..... upon. hearing of the parties, application of mind, and recording of reasons for decision were basic elements which must be complied with. in babloo pasi versus state of jharkhand, (2008) 13 scc133 reference was made to principle of audi alteram partem that no party shall be condemned unheard. in the context of juvenile justice (care and protection of children .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2018 (HC)

State of Nct of Delhi vs.dharmender

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2018

..... , the entry made in the official record by an official or person authorized, in performance of an official duty is admissible under section 35 of the evidence act but the party may still ask the court/authority to examine its probative value. in the present case, neither during the cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses, including pw-2 the principal of the ..... the entry made in the official record by an official or person authorised in performance of an official duty is admissible under section 35 of the evidence act but the party may still ask the court/authority to examine its probative value. the authenticity of on whose instruction/information such entry stood recorded and what was his source of in school register ..... appeal upon grant of leave to assail the judgment dated 24.03.2017 rendered by the learned additional sessions judge-01-cum-presiding officer [special court designated under the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 (pocso act)]., district south-east, new delhi in case no.1806/16, sessions case no.194/2013 arising out of fir no.351/2013 registered at ..... its conduct of the appeal should and will act in accordance with rules and principles well known and recognized in the administration of justice.8. the supreme court has ever since applied the said principles and elaborated further on the same from time to time. in ghurey lal v. state of u.p., (2008) 10 scc450 after analyzing the earlier decisions, the supreme .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 2018 (HC)

Rajeev Sikka vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-04-2018

..... product stood manufactured at a place other than the place where it was sold, in a prosecution launched under the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954, the apex court in state of punjab v. nohar chand, (1984) 3 scc512 held that the manufacturer could be sued alongwith the seller at the ..... ) and of a consequence which has ensued. with the fulfillment of these two essential ingredients, the offence may be tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction such act stands committed or consequence ensued. thus, what needs to be considered is, as to what is the meaning of the word consequence ..... 177 of the code postulates that every offence shall ordinarily be inquired and tried by a court in whose local jurisdiction the offence stands committed. the apex court in naresh kavarchand khatri v. state of gujarat, (2008) 8 scc300 has clarified that whether an officer incharge of a police station has the ..... . chandel, learned counsel, referred to and relied upon the decisions rendered by in manoj kumar sharma v. state of the apex court chhattisgarh, (2016) 1; naresh kavarchand khatri v. state of gujarat, (2008) 8 scc300 & satvinder kaur v. state (govt. of nct of delhi), (1999) 8 scc728 scc9w.p.(crl) 3159/ ..... 2017 page 12 of 14 15. these decisions do not deal with the issues at all, for the issue in the said case(s) was transfer of investigation to an officer having competent jurisdiction. the court .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //