Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Year: 2019 Page 2 of about 70 results (0.093 seconds)

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. M/S Rajendra Prasad Bansal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

General Manager North Western Railway Vs. M/S s.k. Construction

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Maya Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

North Western Railway General Manager Vs. M/S Sb Shc McDpl (Jv)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. M/S b.m. Construction Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. M/S Balaji Builders and Developers

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. M/S Kewal Construction Co. (Jv)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. M/S Rajendra Prasad Bansal Thr. Partner Rajendra Pr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. M/S Harinarayan Khandelwal Th. Director

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Sri Harsha Constructions

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

..... set aside and an arbitral tribunal should again be constituted in the manner provided in terms of clause 64.12. dealing with a matter arising from the old act (the arbitration act, 1940), this court, in union of india v. m.p. gupta [(2004) 10 scc504 held that appointment of a retired judge as sole arbitrator 44 contrary to clause 64 (which requiring ..... to make fresh appointment, the chief justice or his designate is not powerless to make appropriate alternative arrangements to give effect to the provision for arbitration. 41. this court has put emphasis to act on the agreed terms and to first resort to the procedure as prescribed and open for the parties to the agreement to settle differences/disputes arising under the ..... serving gazetted railway officers being appointed) was impermissible.13. the position after the new act came into force, is different, as explained by this court in northern railway admn., ministry of railway v. patel engg. co. ltd.[(2008) 10 scc240. this court held that the appointment of arbitrator(s) named in the arbitration agreement is not mandatory or a must ..... in northern railway case [(2008) 10 scc240 that the chief justice or his designate should first ensure that the remedies provided under the arbitration agreement are exhausted, but at the same time also ensure that the twin requirements of sub section (8) of section 11 of the act are kept in view. this would mean that invariably the court should first appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //