Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pepsu court of wards act 2008 bk Year: 2019 Page 4 of about 70 results (0.055 seconds)

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Raghuvir Singh Raghave vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Shri Rajendra Prasad & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Yash Pal Singh vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Ramesh Chand Rana vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Bhupinder Kumar Malik vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

B S Martolia vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Dinesh Chandra Sharma vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Trilooki Nath Pandita vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Mohan Singh Chilwal vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Ram Byas Rai vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2019

..... of the level of joint secretary and above and officers appointed by the central government corporations established by or under the central act, government companies, societies etc. the court held as under: can it be said that the classification is based on intelligible differentia when one set of bureaucrats of joint ..... (2) is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in union of india v. dinesh engineering corporation (supra) the supreme court held that courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision when it is based on the views of experts and knowledgeable persons.29 ..... who had obtained an interim order prior to retirement. 34.5 in view of the subsequent decision, the nigam by a resolution dated 13th april, 2008 resolved to enhance the age of superannuation of employees, irrespective of the source of entry, to 60 years. however, the state government provided a ..... union of india (1999) 4 scc756and union of india v. dineshan k.k. (2008) 1 scc586 27. having examined the said decisions, it appears to the court that it is not entirely correct that the supreme court has adopted a hands-off approach in relation to questions concerning differential treatment to those working ..... c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 43 of 70 recommendations dated 13th april, 2008 of the nigam. 34.6 this led to a further round of litigation and the division bench of the allahabad high court, lucknow bench by its common judgment dated 29th july, 2010 declared the 2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //