Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pollution of air prevention and control of pollution Page 1 of about 2,239 results (0.022 seconds)

Jul 23 2001 (HC)

Free Legal Aid Cell Shri Sugan Chand Aggarwal Alias Bhagat Ji Vs. Govt ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi455; 93(2001)DLT28; 2001(60)DRJ297

..... of 1987) was brought to include noise in the definition of the term 'air pollutant'.20. the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 was enacted under article 253 of the constitution of india to ..... be part of and not severable from the common law of nuisance despite the enactment of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 or the environment (protection) act, 1986. the purpose of these enactments has been to include the pollution control measures in the wider conspectus of social justice.24. the effect of noise on health is a ..... , named as the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 and the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, there is no independent act to deal with the problems of noise pollution. it was after the enactment of the environment (protection) act, 1985, that attention was attracted to noise pollution. but instead of bringing any self-contained enactment for preventing noise pollution, the air (prevention and control of pollution) amendment act, 1987 (47 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 1999 (HC)

Bijayananda Patra and ors., Etc. Vs. District Magistrate, Cuttack and ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2000Ori70

..... of 1987) was brought to include noise in the definition of the term 'air pollutant.'the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 was enacted under article 253 of the constitution of india to implement ..... be part of and not severable from the common law of nuisance despite the enactment of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 or the environment (protection) act, 1986. the purpose of these enactments have been to include the pollution control measures in the wider conspectus of social justice.17. the effect of noise on health is a ..... , named as the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 and the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, there is no independent act to deal with the problem of noise pollution. it was after the enactment of the environment (protection) act, 1985, that attention was attracted to noise pollution. but instead of bringing any self-contained enactment for preventing noise pollution, the air (prevention and control of pollution) amendment act, 1987 (47 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2007 (HC)

Gaj Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1104

..... the sound of the forest. keep your sound level to minimum.14. when you are n the forest. enjoy it the way nature created it.8. in order to control pollution, (the) air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 (for short '1981 act') was enacted. to ensure standards for emission from automobiles section 20 was enacted, which reads thus:20; power to give instructions for ..... ensuring standards for omission from automobiles. with a view to ensuring that the standards for emission of air pollutants from automobiles laid down by the state board under clause (g) of sub ..... act, 1939, and such authority shall, notwithstanding anything contained in that act or the rules thereunder be bound to comply with such instructions.9. since there are statutory provisions for controlling pollution and to protect the wildlife, we find prima facie case in favour of the appellants. we therefore stay the operation of the impugned judgment dated may 25, 2007 of the ..... your match stick may destroy thousands of trees. don't allow fire to spread.9. you may be the root cause for death of many animals and plants in similipal, control fire.10. tiger will not differentiate between a deer and a tourist.11. woods are lovely, dark and deep follow the rules and smile to sleep.12. don't play .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2012 (HC)

Union of India Vs. G.Krishnan

Court : Delhi

..... and economic interests of the state, but in breach of the states obligations under the environment protection act, and other such like legislations, such as the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, air (prevention and control of pollution) act etc. would be vulnerable to challenge and may eventually not serve the purpose for which such a policy is framed. therefore, while formulating its policies, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2003 (HC)

Forum for a Better Hyderabad (Confederation of Voluntary Organizations ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(1)ALT500

..... members including the citizens of the surrounding villages. thereafter the matter was considered by the technical committee constituted under the provisions of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act and the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 in detail. as directed by them revised plan was submitted on the basis of which ultimately the technical committee recommended ..... several conditions mentioned in schedule a and schedule b, annexed thereto. the said order was issued under section 25 of water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 and section 21 of air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 and the rules made thereunder.20. the counter filed on behalf of the 7th respondent-union of india shows ..... that on 30-12-2002 the application of the 2nd respondent was placed before the technical committee constituted under the provisions of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act and the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 and the committee after elaborately considering the details submitted by the applicant suggested that the 2nd respondent should be directed ..... 16-9-2002 for no objection certificate and seeking consent for establishment was submitted to the a.p. pollution control board under section 25 of the water prevention and control of pollution act, 1974 and section 21 of the air prevention and control of pollution act, 1981. in pursuance thereof having considered all the aspects the board granted cfe dated 18-1- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2008 (HC)

Siddeshwara International Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1356; 2009(3)KCCRSN99; 2009(4)AIRKarR367

..... the petitioner to revoke the said order. the same were not considered. the petitioner has also produced the consent letter obtained under water (prevention and control of pollution) act as per annexure-q and air (prevention and control of pollution) act as per annexure-r. however, as the environmental clearance certificate was not granted, the aforesaid consent letters were withdrawn by the aforesaid ..... . the mines & geology department as per government order dated 3.3.2006 constituted a committee comprising of senior director (technical cell), ecology and environmental zonal officer, central pollution control board and conservator of forests, chikmagalur circle to inspect the spot with respect to the issue raised by 3rd respondent and submit report. the deputy commissioner, chikmagalur by letter ..... objection. the petitioner was instructed not to take up any mining activity in the area until further orders as per letter dated 19.12.2005. the karnataka state pollution control board as per letter dated 19.12.2005 instructed the regional officer, hassan that consent for operation should be issued after issue of environmental clearance certificate. one more ..... annexure-c is the copy of the mining lease. the petitioner is the owner of the property in respect of which the mining lease was granted. the karnataka state pollution control board by their letter dated 8th august, 2005 gave their consent for the establishment of mining industry. annexure-d is the copy of the said letter. the deputy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2000 (HC)

Enkay Plastics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000(56)DRJ828

..... cpcb. sub-section (1) of section 16 which is general in nature incorporates that the main function of cpcb would be to improve the quality of air and to prevent control or abate air pollution in the country. sub-section (2) of section 16 lays down particular function in clauses (a) to (j) thereof for the purposes of performing ..... act will also perform the functions of state boards ins respect of prevention, control and abatement of air pollution. however, in those states in which state boards for the prevention and control of water pollution have not been constituted under the act, separate state boards for the prevention and control of air pollution are proposed to be constituted. 32. it is clear from the ..... relate to the preservation of the quality of air and control of air pollution'.30. the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 (14 of 1981), is a spcialised legislative measure, meant to take one facet of environmental pollution. it was enacted with following main objectives:(a) to provide for the prevention, control and abatement of air pollution; (b) to provide for the establishment of ..... first scan through the relevant provisions. the purpose because of which this act was passed, hardly needs any emphasis. it may be however, stressed that the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, has important constitutional implications, with an international background. the act drew its inspiration from the proclamation adopted by the united nations conference on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2005 (SC)

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC4256; (2005)6CompLJ158(SC); JT2005(8)SC588; (2006)1SCC1

..... or process or stoppage of regulation of the supply of electricity or water or any other service.parliament has also enacted enactments to prevent and control water pollution and air pollution [the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 and the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981]. a statement was placed before this court by the central government showing the position as on 20th march, 2000 ..... existing forest areas. xxx xxx xxx4.8.1. encroachment on forest lands has been on the increase. this trend has to be arrested and effective action taken to prevent its continuance. there should be no regularization of existing encroachments. xxx xxx xxx4.9. the main considerations governing the establishment of forest-based industries and supply of raw ..... forest or tree-cover. in the hills and in mountainous regions, the aim should be to maintain two-third of the area under such cover in order to prevent erosion and land degradation and to ensure the stability of the fragile ecosystem. clause 4.3 lays down the aspects of management of state forests. it would be ..... existing laws dealing directly or indirectly with several environmental matters, it is necessary to have a general legislation for environmental protection. existing laws generally focus on specific types of pollution or on specific categories of hazardous substances. some major areas of environmental hazards are not covered. there also exist uncovered gaps in areas of major environmental hazards. there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2007 (SC)

Bhag Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC696; 2007(1)SCALE138; (2007)2SCC218

..... on 8.4.2002 by the board showing that 61 units have complied with the provisions of the air (prevention & control of pollution) act, 1981. out of remaining 27 units, 16 units have been closed down by the board under section 21/31a of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981. 8 units have closed down their units themselves. remaining 3 number units have not installed ..... air pollution control devices. thereafter 2 more units have installed air pollution control devices and 1 unit has changed its fuel from furnace oil to liquid petroleum gas (lpg) in ..... which air pollution control devices is not required. hence, all the remaining industrial units have complied with the provisions of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981.submitted for the kind information of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2004 (HC)

Lal Chand Pradhan and ors. Vs. Asgar Ali and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 110(2004)DLT613; 2004(74)DRJ35

..... of first instance has considered the preliminary issue of the maintainability of the suit filed by the present respondents keeping in view the provisions of section 46 of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981. it has also declined to grant any interim injunction. the first appellate court, however. has issued the injunction prayed for, restraining defendants no.1 to 16 ..... is reproduced below:'in pursuance of the provisions of clause (d) of section 2 of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 (nb.14 of 1981) read with notification no.1egal 158 (4)/90 dated the 15th march, 1991 of the central pollution control board, the delhi pollution control committee hereby approves the following fuels as the 'approved fuels' for the purposes of the said ..... looked at, the petitioners cannot be heard to contend that they can use fuels which are not covered/contained in the said notification since that will have the effect of polluting the atmosphere. 7. it is next contended that even if the revision is not maintainable a petition under article 227 of the constitution is maintainable. this question has also ..... from using their furnaces for making pottery by burning unapproved and polluting fuels.2. the fuels that can be used have been itemised in the notification no. f.25(258)/ .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //