Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: prevention and control of pollution Page 1 of about 2,757 results (0.043 seconds)

Mar 10 2003 (SC)

Orissa State (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Board Vs. Orient Pa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC1966; (2003)3CompLJ55(SC); 2003CriLJ1702; JT2003(3)SC74; 2003(3)SCALE44; (2003)10SCC421; [2003]2SCR741

..... court passed in criminal revision, upholding the order passed by the addl. sessions judge rourkela, quashing the charges framed against the respondent under section 37(1) of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 (for short 'the act').3. according to the prosecution, the respondent orient paper mills brajraj nagar, dist. sambalpur, engaged in manufacturing of paper and paper board ..... also forwarded to the industry. according to the board the respondent failed to comply with the consent condition thereby committed an offence punishable under section 37(1) of air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981. hence a complaint was filed in the court of sdjm rourkela by the board against the respondents. 4. the sdjm on 7.10.95 framed charges ..... sravana 14,1908department of science technology and environmentnotificationthe 8th july, 1986 no. 10985-enn. iii-5/86-ste- in exercise of powers under section 19(1) of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 and in supersession of notification no. 5564- env. iii-3/84-ste, dated the 6th june, 1984 the governor is pleased to declare the areas and ..... and environmentnotificationthe 27/29th february, 1988 no. 3044-env-1-3/88-ste. in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 19 of the air (prevention and control of pollution act, 1981 (14 of 1981) and in supersession of the notification of the government of orissa deptt. of science, technology and environment no. 10985/ste, dated 8th july, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2003 (HC)

Adarsh Brick Kiln Industry Vs. Chairman of Prevention and Control of P ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2004All58; 2003(3)AWC2579

..... an appropriate place, after following the requirements of air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981.3. one sri kamlesh kumar singh made complaints against petitioners for causing pollution to the neighbouring village by their brickkiln. in writ petition no. 4189 of 2001, a division ..... situate towards north within 100 metres and that the brick-kiln has been established without informing and taking no objection certificate from the u.p. pollution control board which is an offence under section 37/39 of the act. it was also found that the regional office, varanasi, had rejected an ..... bench of this court by its order dated 5.2.2001 directed the u.p. pollution control board to dispose of his representation in accordance with law, preferably within six weeks from the date of communication. an inspection was made and that ..... tripathi for respondent nos. 2 and 3.2. petitioner has challenged the order dated 28.12.2001 passed by the principal secretary, u.p. pollution control board and the another dated 11.12.2001 passed by the appellate authority by which he has been directed to change the site of brickkiln at ..... present case inasmuch as the petitioner's brickkiln was found to be established within 100 metres from the abadi towards north and was found causing pollution. this order was passed noting down the fact found in the inspection that the brick-kiln has a fixed chimney. considering all the aspects .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 1997 (HC)

K. Muniswamy Gowda and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(3)KarLJ594

..... it may consider necessary to take steps for the prevention, control or abatement of air pollution; (f) to inspect air pollution control areas at such intervals as it may think necessary, assess the quality of air therein and take steps for the prevention, control or abatement of air pollution in such areas; (g) to lay down, in consultation with the ..... training of persons engaged or to be engaged in programs relating to prevention, control or abatement of air pollution and to organize mass-education program relating thereto; (e) to inspect, at all reasonable times, any control equipment, industrial plant or manufacturing process and to give, by order, such directions to such persons as ..... and without prejudice to the performance of its functions, if any, under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 (6 of 1974), the functions of a state board shall be.- (a) to plan a comprehensive program for the prevention, control or abatement of air pollution and to secure the execution thereof; (b) to advise the state government on any ..... matter concerning the prevention, control or abatement of air pollution; (c) to collect and disseminate information relating to air pollution; (d) to collaborate with the central board in organizing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 1986 (HC)

The Member-secretary, Kerala State Board for Prevention and Control of ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1986Ker256

..... if not entirely, for the board to oversee activities of the industries and the local authorities with a view to check and control pollution. it is such a board, that attends to every detail relating to the prevention of pollution of water. the board cannot then be treated as an outside agency. nor can its decisions be characterised as having the ..... on certain industries and by local authorities, with a view to augment the resources of the central board and the state boards for the prevention and control of water pollution constituted under the water (prevention and control of pollution act). 1974.' strong indications are available in the enactment itself about the intertwining and interlacing of the two enactments. the cess act is ..... substantial work to prescribe different tolerance limits for surface effluents discharged into inland surface waters (1974) of industrial effluents (1982) and of inland surface water subject to pollution (1982)). (vide water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 : basic legal issues by s.n. jain, cochin university, law review. 1984. vol viii at page 139).23. the above background of ..... respect of that division under section 3; (ii) the proceedings of the appellate committee are vitiated by legal bias; and (iii) rule (6) of the water (prevention and control of pollution) cess rules, 1978 relied on by the appellate committee for denying the benefit of rebate to the petitioners is ultra vires. the learned judge held that 'chemical industry', .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2004 (HC)

Bihar State Pollution Control Board and anr. Vs. Hiranand Stone Works ...

Court : Patna

..... of the water act provides the functions of the state board. clause (a) says that the board would be entitled to plan a comprehensive programme for the prevention, control or abatement of pollution of streams and wells in the state and to secure the execution thereof. section 17 also provides further powers and authorities in favour of the board.27. section ..... those states by parliament by law;'18. a fair reading of these preambles would make it clear that the air act has been enacted to provide for the prevention, control, and abatement of air pollution, for the establishment, with a view to carrying out the aforesaid purposes, of boards, for conferring on and assigning to such boards powers and functions relating ..... the preambles of the three acts, namely, air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, environment (protection) act, 1986 and water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974.15. preamble of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 (act no. 14 of 1981) is as under :--an act to provide for the prevention control and abatement of air pollution, for the establishment, with a view to carrying out ..... 8-11-2003. it is submitted that in accordance with the provisions of sections 17 and 25/26 of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 (in short 'water act') and sections 17 and 25 of the air (prevention and control pollution) act, 1981, they are entitled to issue fresh guidelines if they are of the opinion that the earlier guidelines have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1996 (HC)

M/S. Sri Durga Glass Works, Firozabad Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1997All179

..... organisms.'7. the legislature in its wisdom then framed the water (prevention and control of pollution) gess act, 1977. the aim and object was that the slates were not having sufficient funds to prevent and control pollution. it became essential and imperative on account of rapid industrialization. there was explosion of pollution and the pressure of on environmental resources.8. the parliament framed mis ..... water of rajasthan and other places. the supreme court thus gave a new dimension in interpreting the law of environment i.e. the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 and the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 as well as environment (protection) act, 1986.11. so in the light of this new philosophy to solve the human problems ..... process of formation of glass. the melting process of material in the transformation of the glass process certainly produces fumes by burning process.23. cess is meant for prevention and control of pollution. it cannot be imagined that this industry is not consuming, water in the industry in any form. no industry can exist without water. in our considered ..... carrying on certain industries and by local authorities, with a view to augment the resources of the central board and the state boards for the prevention and conirol of water pollution constituted under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974. be it enacted by parliament in the twenty eighth year of the republic of india as follows : prefatory note -- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 1994 (HC)

N.S. Tewana Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994IIAD(Delhi)593; 54(1994)DLT578; 1994(29)DRJ258

..... denied. i categorically again submit before this hon'bie court that the same has been lawfully done in exercise of the powers vested with the central government under the water (prevention & control , of pollution) act, 1974.'(29) the petitioner was selected for the post of the chairman after scrutiny and the appointment was approved by the appointments cabinet committee and the appointment order ..... has been superseded by the government of india in public interest in lawful exercise of powers vested under section 61(1)(b) of water (prevention & control of pollution) act, 1974. i further respectfully submit that the petitioner's allegation in the writ petition that the supersession of the central board by respondent no.1 has been activated by ..... acc for a three year term, on 12th october, 1990. a copy of the order is enclosed. according to rule 3(3) of the rules notified under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 'where a government servant is appointed as chairman, the terms and conditions of his service shall be such as may be specified by the central government from ..... minister has stated on the floor of the house that the cpcb will be reconstituted to remedy the situation. 4. according to section 61(1)(b) of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974, if the central government is of the opinion that circumstances exist which render it necessary in the public interest, it may supersede the central board. sectional (2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2000 (HC)

Enkay Plastics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000(56)DRJ828

..... this aspect by referring to the objective with which the act in question was enacted and noticed that the main objective of legislation was to provide for the prevention, control and abatement of air pollution. thereforee, one has to give purposive interpretation to such statutes so as to foster and subserve the objectives with which such legislations arc passed and, thereforee, ..... cpcb. sub-section (1) of section 16 which is general in nature incorporates that the main function of cpcb would be to improve the quality of air and to prevent control or abate air pollution in the country. sub-section (2) of section 16 lays down particular function in clauses (a) to (j) thereof for the purposes of performing its function. ..... background under which the act was passed that the main objective was to provide for, prevention, control and abatement of air pollution. it was felt that with the increasing industrialisation and the tendency of majority of the industries to congregate in areas which are already heavily industrialised and densely ..... said act will also perform the functions of state boards ins respect of prevention, control and abatement of air pollution. however, in those states in which state boards for the prevention and control of water pollution have not been constituted under the act, separate state boards for the prevention and control of air pollution are proposed to be constituted. 32. it is clear from the above .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2007 (HC)

NitIn Majumdar S/O Shamsundar Majumdar Vs. State of Karnataka by Its P ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR2969; 2007(4)KarLJ569; 2007(4)KCCRSN265; 2007(4)AIRKarR155; 2007CrLJNOC750; AIR2007NOC1613

..... which, among other things, include the preservation of the quality of air and control of air pollution, the 'air act' was enacted. the act provides for prevention, control and abatement of air pollution. as the air pollution is steadily increasing day by day, the 'air act' was enacted for controlling the same. it is needless to mention that the presence in air, beyond ..... certain limits of various pollutants discharged through industrial emissions and from certain human activities connected with traffic, ..... the board decided to delegate its power and functions to the chairman of the board in terms of section 11a of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1978 (amended) and section 15 of air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 under the following circumstances: a) in respect of industries who are discharging their effluent without a valid consent under ..... sections.b) in respect of industries against whom orders passed by the chairman under section 32(1)(c) of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 and under section 23 of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 and if such units have not complied with the directions issued, the chairman of the board is authorized to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1997 (HC)

Kalyani Industries, Golapur (V) Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal Dist. Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(1)ALD505

..... ) act, 1981, as amended by amendment act, 1987, the air (prevention and control of pollution) rules, 1982 and the air (prevention and control of pollution ..... prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 amended upto 1988, the water (prevention and control of pollution) rules, 1975, the water (prevention and control of pollution) (procedure for transaction of business) rules, 1975, the water (prevention and control of pollution)cess act, 1977 as amended by amendment act, 1991, the water (prevention and control of pollution) cess rules, 1978, the air (prevention and control of pollution ..... order of the board wherein the appellate authority will dispose of such appeal in accordance with rule 17 of the air (prevention and control of pollution) (union territories) rules, 1983. therefore, as rightly contended by the learned standing counsel for the board and also other ..... 1-1996 alleging that the petitioner was operating the unit in contravention to the directions issued under section 31a of air (prevention and control of pollution) amendment act, 1987 (for short 'the air act'), that the industry must be closed for violating the conditions .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //