Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: allahabad Year: 1974 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.019 seconds)

Sep 30 1974 (HC)

Ram Bahadur Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-30-1974

Reported in : 1975CriLJ1279

..... with this modification that while the sentence of six months' rigorous imprisonment, imposed upon the applicant, under section 7/16 of the prevention of food adulteration act, is maintained, the sentence of fine of rs. 1,500/- imposed upon him is reduced to a sum of rs. 1,000/- only. with ..... being just a casual one, the applicant should be extended the benefit of first offenders probation act. he has relied upon a decision of the supreme court in : 1972crilj874 . ishar das v. state of punjab. that was a case in which ice-cream had been adulterated and was found deficient in ..... guilt of the accused-applicant established. the trial court convicted the applicant under section 7 read with section 16 of the prevention of food adulteration act and sentenced him to six months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of rs. 1,500/-. the appellate court confirmed the conviction and sentence. hence ..... repentant mood. the supreme court gave the benefit of first offenders probation act to the accused.6. the aforesaid decision of the supreme court was again referred in a subsequent decision of that court in : 1973crilj49 jai narain v. municipal corporation of delhi. in this case the earlier view of that ..... court was affirmed and it was held that:the provisions of the probation of offenders act apply to persons found guilty under the prevention of food adulteration act.but it is significant to note that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1974 (HC)

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow Vs. State Transport App ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-23-1974

Reported in : AIR1975All154

..... retrospective effect to bind the past transactions. for the same reasons the law laid down in firm bengali mal v. sales tax officer (air 1958 all 478) (fb) and municipal corporation case (1970) 2 scc 280 = (air 1970 sc 1292) is not applicable to the present case. in those cases the validating provisions were found ineffective because the ..... in road transport business prior to 1951, therefore sections 19 and 20 of the 1955 act could not validate the earlier notifications or schemes issued or framed under the 1951 act. reliance was placed on sri prithvi cotton mills v. broach borough municipality (air 1970 sc 192) and municipal corpn. v. new shrock spg & wvg. co. ltd., 1970 (2) scc 2/80 = ..... also under challenge. the supreme court in northern india caterers (p.) ltd. v. state of punjab (air 1967 sc 1581) had declared the punjab public premises and land (eviction and rent recovery) act, 1959, void as section 5 of that act, practised discrimination and was thus violative of article 14 of the constitution. subsequently, the legislature enacted the public premises (eviction ..... of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971. section 20 of that act sought to validate the proceedings taken under the 1958 act with retrospective effect .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 1974 (HC)

Uma Shanker and ors. Vs. Salig Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-1974

Reported in : AIR1975All36

..... v. sitamma, (air 1915 mad 517); venkataramana v. kasturiranga, (ilr 40 mad 212) : (air 1917 mad 112 fb); collector of poona v. bai chanchalbai (1911) ilr 35 bom 470 and eralappa mudaliar v. balkrishniah : air1927mad710 , which appear to have takea the view that strangers to the trust may be made parties to a ..... also agreed with the view ofthe chief justice. the decision in (1906)2 all lj 591 (supra) was considered inthe case of manohari v. muhammed ismail (1911) 8 all lj 896 and the view thatmortgagees and alienees could also bemade parties to a suit under section 539,was affirmed. we regret our inability toagree with ..... person could be joined as a party though no relief could be claimed against him. the bombay high court in collector of poona v. bai chanchalbai, ((1911) ilr 35 bom 470) had taken the view that an alienee was a necessary party although possession could not be recovered from him. in the case of ..... to him, and not to cases where it is sought to recover possession from trespassers. section 92 was amended by the code of civil procedure amendment act, 1956 (act no, 66 of 1956) and clause (cc) was added to enable the court to pass a decree directing a trustee who had been removed or ..... been used in a particular piece of legislation. the provisions of the improvement act, particularly sections 45 to 49 and 54 and 54-a when they speak of a certain building or street or square or other land vesting in a municipality or other local body or in a trust, do not necessarily mean that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //