Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: allahabad Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.027 seconds)

Apr 27 1977 (HC)

Smt. Shyam Kumari and ors. Vs. Ejaz Ahmad Ansari

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-27-1977

Reported in : AIR1977All376

..... the first place the demolition of a building by the landlord, even though in pursuance of a notice under section 263 (1) of the u. p. municipalities act, cannot be said to be a destruction of the premises by an irresistible force within the meaning of the said clause of section 108. in the second ..... dispute was demolished by the landlords on the 4th april, 1958 in pursuance of a notice issued to them by the municipal board, lucknow, under section 265 (1) of the u; p. municipalities act. on the 17th april 1958 the plaintiff-respondent instituted the suit giving rise to the appeal for injunction restraining the landlords ..... the tenant had not been destroyed in any fashion but he had been merely prevented from suing, it because he had to leave that part of punjab where the property existed on account of the communal riots and the partition of that estate as it existed at the time of the lease. this ..... the subordinate judge, kangra, at dharamshala for a decree for refund of the rent paid by him was decreed. on appeal, the high court of punjab reversed the decree, holding that the doctrine of frustration of contract did not apply to lease of immovable property and that in any event on the facts ..... appellant had obtained from the court of wards, dada siba estate, a lease of five squares of land in tahsil okara, district montgomery in the undivided punjab for the kharif season 1947 and rabi season 1948. following the partition of india in july 1947 and allotment of the territory in which the lands .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1977 (HC)

Dr. Ashok Ranjan Saxena Vs. Smt. Vishwa Bharti

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-30-1977

Reported in : AIR1978All18

..... district court has jurisdiction to entertain the petition. (see henrietta alexandra gale v. james frank oanduras gale, (1911) 10 ind cas 487 (lah)) in which a full bench of the punjab chief court was concerned with the interpretation of section 3(1) of the divorce act (iv of 1860). though the above decision dealt with a different law, the provision under consideration was ..... '.though these decisions dealt with different provisions of law, the observations made therein are helpful for construing the scope of the expression 'resided together' occurring in section 19 of the act. i consequently unhesitatingly hold that the three visits, attributed to the applicant, to bareilly to the father's house of the opposite party to achieve reconciliation between the husband and ..... bareilly where the petition had been lodged had no jurisdiction to entertain and hear it.4. the learned civil judge, bareilly, before whom the petition under section 10 of the act was pending, framed a preliminary issue as follows :--'whether this court has jurisdiction to try the suit'.on the preliminary issue the opposite party examined herself as a witness to ..... for judicial separation was found on allegations of mental and physical cruelty.2. undisputably the applicant and the opposite party were hindus within the meaning of section 2 of the act and were married according to the hindu rites and customs at allahabad on the 25th june, 1974, after their marriage they lived as husband and wife at allahabad till december .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1977 (HC)

Gyasi Ram Vs. Ram Chandra Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-06-1977

Reported in : AIR1978All376

..... siugh, (air 1960 manipur 54); fateh chand v. brij bhushan prakash : air1957all801 ; ratneswar v. mongoli chutiani (air 1951 assam 70); g. goculdas tejpal v. municipal commissioner, (18 bom 256) (sic)reference was also made to 1962 all lj (summary of cases) 44.7. on the basis of the submissions made by the learned ..... ); mukat singh v. misra paras ram, (air 1924 all 726); hashmat husain v. saghir ahmad : air1958all847 ; ramayan prasad v. gulabo kuer : air1967pat35 ; mohd. amir v. municipal board. sitapur : air1965sc1923 ; sada ram v. gajjan siama ; daya ram v. chiraunji lal : air1977all449 .6. shri b. p. agarwal, learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent, ..... in that very suit. the observations merely say that the denial may be made in the pleadings or in other documents. in my view, the punjab decision purporting to be based on : air1965sc1923 does not lay down the correct law. moreover, as i have noticed 'above, the division bench ..... terms, whether the same be in a pleading or in other documents, no forfeiture is incurred.'30. in my view with respect, the punjab case has not correctly interpreted the aforesaid supreme court pronouncement. far from dissenting from the law laid down in air 1919 pc 1 the supreme ..... : air1965sc1923 . the following passage from the said supreme court's judgment was extracted and relied on in the punjab case (at p. 1928):'no doubt the provisions of the t. p. act were not, it is stated in terms, applicable to the area in question, but it has been laid down .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1977 (HC)

Smt. Bhagyawati Mittal Vs. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Luck ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-05-1977

Reported in : AIR1978All356

..... to muzaffarna-gar. it was being driven by the defendant respondent no. 2. ram kumar. an accident involving this bus took place near the municipal toll barrier of muzaffarnagar. the plaintiff sustained injuries due to this accident. certain other consequences resulted directly as a result of this accident causing injury ..... , d. k. lakshmiah v. union of india (air 1969 andh pra 386), subbraratham v. gunavanthalal (air 1937 mad 472), n. rak-shit v. commr. bhardeshwar municipality, ((1969) 73 cal wn 88) and bore gowda v. b. nagaraju, (air 1969 mys 8). similarly, controversy about the damages, if any, to be awarded to ..... am quoting the following para from the trial court's judgment: 'she has stated that she was the daughter of the late chief justice of punjab high court who was for some time a member of privy council also. her husband was a retired executive engineer of the railways and had ..... in : air1977all330 the division bench laid down as follows :-- 'coming to the second part of the contention, the relevant section in the motor vehicles act regarding awarding of compensation is section 110-b. it only states that the claims tribunal shall, after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard, hold ..... for a tort are those which 'so far as money can compensate, will give the injured party reparation for the wrongful act and for all the natural and direct consequences of the wrongful act '(admiralty commrs. v. susquehanna (owners), (1926) all er 124 of p. 127). the words 'so far as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //