Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-27-1966
Reported in : AIR1968AP83; 1968CriLJ294
..... establishments. this regulation does not, for instance, apply to the servants of the public works department, registration department education department, establishments of civil and criminal courts, servants of the municipality, sales tax department, entertainment-tax department, income-tax department, stamps department, betting department or motor vehicles taxation department, etc. all of whom have the power and duty of collecting ..... be achieved by the regulation, it offends the 'equality' provision of article 14. the different classes viz., revenue officials and other officials, such as the sales-tax officers, municipal bill collectors etc., are said to be similar, and there is no justification in discriminating one from the other. it is said all of them have to collect moneys ..... allegation or accusation of actual or suspected or apprehended commission by that person of any offence of a criminal or a quasi-criminal nature or some act prejudicial to the public interests, see state of punjab v. ajaib singh, : 1953crilj180 . in other words, clause (1) has no application where there is no accusation of any criminal or quasi-criminal ..... deals with appeals to the governor in council, was repealed by regulation vii of 1828. section 15 was omitted by section 2 of the madras revenue miscellaneous amendments act, 1936 (act viii of 1936).section 16 deals with suits grounded on proceedings of collector. it says that no suit grounded on the summary proceedings of a collector under this .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-20-1966
Reported in : AIR1968AP50
..... the appellant's rights under the dhara no. 29 of st. 2004 were still good and could have been enforced in the municipal courts until either repealed or repudiated as an act of state. these rights were carried over after the constitution when the indian republic was formed with this important difference viz., that ..... of wadhwan state. the saurashtra state contended that the guarantee contained in the covenant which was sought to be enforced could not be enforced in the municipal courts and the suit was therefore incompetent. the services of the appellant with the wadhwan state was during the pleasure of the ruler of the ..... to which the consideration of the question arises but it is not a vague or an indefinite ground. their lordships in dalip singh v. state of punjab, : 1953crilj1465 observed that 'while misconduct and inefficiency are factors that enter into the account where the order is one of dismissal or removal or of ..... test in such cases is whether the powers conferred by rule 2(2) is in the public interest. as pointed out in ram dial v. state of punjab, : 2scr858 the expression 'public interest' is of wide import and what would be a matter which is in the public interest would necessarily depend ..... servant but for such termination had the right to hold the post. their lordships of the supreme court in another case gurdev singh v. state of punjab, air 1964 sc 15r5 observed that 'if a permanent public servant is asked to retire on the ground that he has reached the age of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-16-1966
Reported in : AIR1968AP74
..... the constitution on the same facts and the same cause of action are concerned, the rule of res judicata has been applied in radha-shyam v. patna municipal corporation, : air1956pat182 . also see in this connection, the decision of the supreme court in godavari parulekar v. state of bombay, : 1953crilj508 . so ..... parties have not been impleaded in the petition against which the appeal is preferred. mr. suryanarayana invited our attention to a decision of the punjab high court in mool raj v. anjuman imdad bahmi bafindgan, , and contended that successive applications for certiorari or mandamus on the same facts ..... the consideration of other factors like the adverse entries relating to the public carriers might be germane and relevant under section 47 of the act, nevertheless, the adverse entries in the history sheet of a public carrier of the applicant cannot be brought into play under the impugned rule ..... the grant of permit for the two categories of transport vehicles is governed by separate conditions. history sheet is not defined anywhere in the act or the rules and the history sheet referred to in the impugned rule undoubtedly relates to an applicant and not to a vehicle or ..... the interests of the public generally and hence germane in considering an applicationfor a stage carriage permit under section 47(1)(a) of the act. mr. ramachandrarao also invited our attention to the two different types of forms prescribed for application for stage carriages and other transport vehicles to .....Tag this Judgment!