Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.058 seconds)

Nov 14 1972 (HC)

Lothamasu Sambasiva Rao Vs. Thadwarthi Balakotiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-14-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP342

..... laid down by the full bench of the madras high court in air 1938 mad 785 ( fb ) finds acceptance, more or less, generally in the decisions rendered by the lahore, punjab, patna, kerala, sind, peshawar, jammu kashmir and mysore high courts. the contrary view taken by the other high courts viz; calcutta, allahabad, oudh, bombay, hyderabad, tripura, rangoon and madhya bharat ..... and therefore, the plaintiff, having accepted the hundis unconditionally, cannot fall back on the original debt.39. what benson and sundaram aiyar, jj., said in palaniappa chetty v. arunachellam chetty, ( 1911 ) 21 mad lj 432 is that the general presumption is that a bill of exchange or hundi given for a debt operates only as a conditional discharge of the debt ..... :-- 'no instrument chargeable with duty shall be admitted in evidence for any purpose by any person having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence, or shall be acted upon, registered or authenticated by any public officer, unless such instrument is duly stamped ;provided that :-- (e) any such instrument not being an instrument chargeable with a duty not ..... transaction, still there exists always an implied promise to pay the loan notwithstanding the inadmissibility of the promissory note on account of the bar of section 35 of the stamp act. what fails for determination is whether presumption as such that the promissory note was executed as a conditional payment or collateral security without further investigation or enquiry as to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1972 (HC)

M. Nageswara Rao Vs. S. Ramachandra Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-13-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP86

..... this litigation are stated below ; the respondent is the owner of house bearing no. 5/122 situated in the main road, 5th ward of rajahmundry municipality. the appellant defendant is the owner of the house bearing door no. 5/123 and it adjoins the plaintiff's house on the north. the terraced ..... it as it is based on sound legal principles supported by authorities. 43. we may also observe here that the easements act does not apply to the province of punjab and the case in air 1933 lah 28 must have been decided on general principles rather than on any statutory provision.44. ..... also observed as follows :'but the affirmative easement differs from the negative easement in this, that the latter can under no circumstances be interrupted except by acts done upon the servient tenement, but the former, constituting as it does, a direct interference with the enjoyment by the servient owner of his tenement, ..... thus :-'the mere putting forward of a claim of ownership in legal proceedings is not conclusive against a right of easement, but if the acts done by the person claiming easement in respect of the property during the statutory period are only referable to a purported character of owner they cannot ..... such, with or without consent of the other or others, acquire an easement for the beneficial enjoyment of such property. 'section 15 of the easements act runs as follows :-'when the access and use of light or air to and for any building have been peaceably enjoyed therewith, as an easement, without .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1972 (HC)

The Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. the ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-17-1972

Reported in : (1972)IILLJ602AP

..... of the latter part of section 2(22) and such remuneration is 'wages' as the same is paid within an interval of two months and cited the decision of the punjab high court in sharma v. employees state insurance corporation 1968-i l.lj. 441], in support of his claim. the decision does not advance his case. therein two workers and ..... ' means the period in respect of which wages are ordinarily payable. the table appended to rule 3 clearly indicates that the basis for the payment of the contributions under the act is the average daily wages. it also indicates the employees' weekly contribution, the employer's weekly contribution, total weekly contribution and corresponding daily standard benefit rate in columns 2, ..... manufactures cigarettes, has employed about 2,400 workmen who are paid wages, dearness allowance and other allowances payable to the employees by an industrial establishment. under the payment of bonus act, 1965, employees are entitled for a minimum bonus of 4% up to a maximum of 20% depending upon the profits earned by the employer. the respondent-company and the ..... is directed against the order of the employees state insurance court, andhra pradesh, hyderabad allowing the application of the respondent under section 75 of the employees' state insurance act, 1948 (hereinafter called 'the act') restraining the appellant from collecting employees' state insurance contribution on productivity index plan bonus.2. the admitted or proved facts leading to this appeal, which lie in a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //