Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: chennai Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.054 seconds)

Dec 06 1972 (HC)

A.M. Sali Maricar and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-06-1972

Reported in : [1973]90ITR116(Mad)

..... way of levy, distraint and sale of the properties of the company were not available for recovery of the property tax levied by a municipality in cases of failure or refusal to pay. in view of this the supreme court of the united states held:' the ordinary remedies by ..... business, though the debtor might be a trader as held in lachhman das on behalf of the firm tilak ram ram bux v. state of punjab, : [1963]2scr353 . confiscation of property is also not allowed under articles 19(1)(f) and 19(5).23. the learned counsel for ..... the petitioners therein, who were dealers in motor spirit in hyderabad, did not submit their returns under the madras sales of motor spirit taxation act (act 6 of 1939), which was extended to andhra pradesh. thereupon, best judgment assessments were made against the petitioners and they were required to pay ..... the object sought to be achieved by the enactment.'38. the supreme court further held that the guidance may be gathered fromthe provisions of the act, its scheme, policy and purpose and the surroundingcircumstances which necessitated the legislation. the question for consideration in that case was whether section 3 ..... was cancelled and the other petitioners were threatened with cancellation of the registration certificate. thereafter, petitions were filed challenging the provisions of the act relating to cancellation of registration certificates on the ground that such cancellation was not a reasonable restriction on the fundamental rights of the petitioners .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1972 (HC)

P. Subramaniam Vs. S. Pachamuthu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-19-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Mad366

..... of a bench of this court in viswanathan v. rangaswami, : air1967mad244 is cited. the court held that where the electoral roll for the municipality (that case related to municipal roll) infringed the constitution in any respect, that part was void and was non est. the full bench of andhra pradesh in govardhan reddy ..... refers to the powers of a tribunal under section 100(1)(d)(v) of the representation of the people act. the supreme court also approved of the decision of a full bench of the punjab high court in rooplal mehta v. dhan singh, which related to the disqualification of a person, whose ..... supreme court affirmed the view that the election tribunal could declare the election to be void by applying sub-section(2)(c) of section 100 of the act.14. mr. n. c. raghavachari, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the supreme court in : [1971]2scr611 referred to and approved the decision ..... is concerned, durga sankar mehta v. raghuraj singh, : [1955]1scr267 deals with the question. that case was one under the representation of the people act and the question was whether the election tribunal could go into the question whether a person, whose name was found in the electoral roll, could be ..... any election.11. in pampakavi rayappa belagali v. b. d. jatti, : [1971]2scr611 , the supreme court held that the entire scheme of the act of 1950 ad the amplitude of its provisions showed that the entries made in an electoral roll of a constituency could only be challenged in accordance with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //