Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : May-01-2002
Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT10(CG)
..... , we are of opinion that the power of removal is quasi-judicial in nature. in bhagat ram v. state of punjab, air 1972 sc 1571, a provision in the punjab municipal act relating to the removal of members was considered by the supreme court. it was held in that case that the order contemplated ..... requires proper understanding of law keeping in mind principle of natural justice. such training is required because state has local body establishments of panchayats, municipal corporation, municipal council and so on and so forth and the disputes like present may often arise and travel to such authorities. therefore, by imparting such legal ..... cause notice was issued. in view of the position of law declared by hon'ble the supreme court in the case of bhagatram v. state of punjab (supra), the said principles have been held applicable by the division bench of m.p. high court in case of bandsman prasad veerbhadra shukla v. ..... such orders are quasi-judicial orders. while considering the case of removal of an office bearer, the supreme court in bhagat ram v. state of punjab (supra), which is similar to the present case, held that the order contemplated by the provision removing a member was quasi-judicial in nature and ..... answer not only to the averments contained in the show-cause notice, but also to the principles laid down in bhagat ram v. state of punjab (supra).'14. in view of the above decision, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 5 submits that the sub-divisional officer ought not .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Aug-07-2002
Reported in : 2003CriLJ3519; 2002(4)MPHT35(CG)
..... a dowry death case. at this stage it would be appropriate to make a reference to a decision of the apex court in gurbaksh singh sibbia v. the state of punjab (air 1980 sc 1632) wherein the constitutional bench while discussing the scope of sections 437 and 438, cr.pc observed thus :--'14. generalisations on matters which rest on discretion and ..... was demand of dowry and that puja was being ill-treated and harassed by in-laws, her husband and his family members, that she was murdered and, to hide that act her body was burnt. this aspect was highlighted by the learned counsel appearing for the state and also the objector but in reply the learned counsel for the applicants drew .....Tag this Judgment!