Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Aug-20-1999
..... , wherein the supreme court upheld the summary procedure for eviction from premises. there the legality of the proceedings initiated under the bombay municipal corporation act and bombay government premises (eviction) act, 1955, was challenged as being violative of article 14 of constitution. that was answered in the negative. it was further pointed out ..... as possible. 176. this disposes of the writ application. civil rule no. 401 of 1998.--this matter arises out of a suit filed by the punjab national bank being title suit no. 19 of 1990 before the civil judge, senior division, dibrugarh, for recovery of an amount of rs. 60 ..... and the tribunal has no jurisdiction to execute those decrees through the recovery officer by adopting the certificate procedure. 85. in the case of the punjab and haryana high court in kundan rice and general mills v. union of india  92 comp cas 895 it has been held that ..... contemplated within the constitutional scheme becomes evident when one analyses clause (3) of article 32 of the constitution.' 29. on the other hand the punjab and haryana high court in kundan rice mill's case  92 comp cas 895 has held articles 323a and 323b were necessiated by the ..... have lost all importance after l. chandra kumar v. union of india : 228itr725(sc) . therefore, with great respect the judgment of the punjab and haryana high court has got no relevance in deciding the validity, so far it relates to the legislative competence of parliament. apart from that, the .....Tag this Judgment!