Court : guwahati
Decided on : Aug-05-2010
..... notice leveled three charges against him. the principal secretary, department of local government, state of punjab after hearing the incumbent passed order removing the appellant from the president ship of the municipality council of rajapura. as against the aforesaid order, while interpreting section 22 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, the hon'ble supreme court explained the meaning of the words 'abuse of powers' ..... appearing in section 22 of the act. therefore, i am of the considered view that the above decision ..... the municipal council and also why he would not be restrained from contesting elections of the ..... as president of the said municipality. here he had held the office for four months when he was served with a notice issued by the principal secretary, department of local government, state of punjab, requiring him to show cause as to why he would not be removed from the post of the president of the municipality and the membership(sic) of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Aug-05-2010
..... continued drudgery through life. it has a much ideal meaning which includes right to livelihood, better standard of life, hygienic conditions in workplace and leisure. in olga tellis v. bombay municipal corporation, 1985(3) scc 545, this court held that no person can live without the means of living i. e. means of livelihood. if the right to livelihood is not ..... grant medical reimbursement to the retired employees of the bank. the apex court in its authoritative pronouncement dealing with the issue of medical reimbursement in the matter of state of punjab and ors. v. ram lubhaya bagga and ors. (1998) 4 scc 117 observed as under: "22. so far as questioning the validity of governmental policy is concerned in our view ..... obligation of paying at the rate fixed by the director. the words are; to the level of expenditure as per the rate fixed by the director, health and family welfare, punjab for a similar treatment package or actual expenditure which ever is less26. no state or any country can have unlimited resources to spend on any of its project. that is ..... and anr. v. sri r. vivekananda swamy air 2008 sc 2080, where it was held that:"it, however, goes without saying that while exercising such a power, the authority must act judiciously keeping in mind the purport and object thereof. considerations there for, although may not partake a mathematical exactable but should always be fair and reasonable. although it may not .....Tag this Judgment!