Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: guwahati Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.022 seconds)

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Smti Junali Doley Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-31-2011

..... ashok maniklal harkut (supra) a full bench of bombay high court while interpreting the expression not less than, occurring in section 55 of maharashtra municipal act has held that if a fraction is ignored then the majority will be less than the requisite number of councilors required to pass a motion of ..... be a majority number. in the said case the issue was whether under the provisions of u.p. municipalities act, which requires adoption of no confidence motion against the president of a municipality by majority of more than half of the members, any resolution adopted by 8 out of 15 members ..... bench of andhra pradesh high court in gogineni koteswara rao (supra) while considering the provisions in section 245(2) of andhra pradesh panchayat raj act, 1994, which provides for unseating of upa sarpanch, president or chairman of panchayat by adopting motion expressing want of confidence carried with the support ..... meeting specially convened for that purpose with the approval of the president of the anchalik panchayat. sub-section (1) of section 43 of the said act, for better appreciation, is quoted below:-43. no confidence motion against the president and the vice-president of anchalik panchayat. - (1) every president ..... saikia (supra) placing reliance on the provisions of section 43(1) of the act as well as a judgment of punjab and haryana high court in jardar khan v. state of haryana and others reported in air 1998 punjab & haryana 249 has held that any fraction, howsoever small may be, cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Manju BorgohaIn Baruah Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-31-2011

..... ashok maniklal harkut (supra) a full bench of bombay high court while interpreting the expression not less than, occurring in section 55 of maharashtra municipal act has held that if a fraction is ignored then the majority will be less than the requisite number of councilors required to pass a motion of ..... be a majority number. in the said case the issue was whether under the provisions of u.p. municipalities act, which requires adoption of no confidence motion against the president of a municipality by majority of more than half of the members, any resolution adopted by 8 out of 15 members ..... bench of andhra pradesh high court in gogineni koteswara rao (supra) while considering the provisions in section 245(2) of andhra pradesh panchayat raj act, 1994, which provides for unseating of upa sarpanch, president or chairman of panchayat by adopting motion expressing want of confidence carried with the support ..... meeting specially convened for that purpose with the approval of the president of the anchalik panchayat. sub-section (1) of section 43 of the said act, for better appreciation, is quoted below:-43. no confidence motion against the president and the vice-president of anchalik panchayat. - (1) every president ..... saikia (supra) placing reliance on the provisions of section 43(1) of the act as well as a judgment of punjab and haryana high court in jardar khan v. state of haryana and others reported in air 1998 punjab & haryana 249 has held that any fraction, howsoever small may be, cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2011 (HC)

M/S Mega Electricals Vs. Assam State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-06-2011

..... ).air 1988 sc 2035 (m/s prestress india corporation -vs- up state electricity board and ors.)iv).air 2000 sc 2272 (m/s monarch infrastructure (p) ltd. -vs- commissioner, ulhasnagar municipal corporation & ors.)v).(2002) 2 scc 475 (food corporation of india -vs- sn nagarkar)vi).(2002) 2 scc 617 (air india ltd. -vs- cochin international airport ltd.)vii).air 1988 ..... cited by mrs. sharma in support of her contentions require examination. .in rameshwar and others (supra), the supreme court found the law stated in ramji lal -vs- state of punjab (air 1986 punjab 374 fb) sound, wherein the court held as thus,"courts do very often take notice of events that happen subsequent to the filing of suits and at times even ..... would be futile exercise in absence of the order dated 10.02.2010 challenged by the petitioner. vivekanand shiksha samiti (supra) relates to haryana private colleges (taking over the management) act (26 of 1978) wherein the court held that even if the order passed on 1.10.1991 and 30.08.1991 was not under challenge in the writ proceeding and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2011 (HC)

Mega Electricals Vs. Assam State Electricity Board

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-06-2011

..... ).air 1988 sc 2035 (m/s prestress india corporation -vs- up state electricity board and ors.) iv).air 2000 sc 2272 (m/s monarch infrastructure (p) ltd. -vs- commissioner, ulhasnagar municipal corporation and ors.) .v).(2002) 2 scc 475 (food corporation of india -vs- sn nagarkar) .vi).(2002) 2 scc 617 (air india ltd. -vs- cochin international airport ltd.) vii).air ..... cited by mrs. sharma in support of her contentions require examination. in rameshwar and others (supra), the supreme court found the law stated in ramji lal -vs- state of punjab (air 1986 punjab 374 fb) sound, wherein the court held as thus, "courts do very often take notice of events that happen subsequent to the filing of suits and at times even ..... would be futile exercise in absence of the order dated 10.02.2010 challenged by the petitioner. vivekanand shiksha samiti (supra) relates to haryana private colleges (taking over the management) act (26 of 1978) wherein the court held that even if the order passed on 1.10.1991 and 30.08.1991 was not under challenge in the writ proceeding and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //