Court : Guwahati
Decided on : May-31-2012
..... protection of persons sought to be preventively detained. these safeguards are required to be ??zealously watched and enforced by the court ? . the apex court in rattan singh v. state of punjab: (1981) 4 scc 481: (air 1982 sc 1) observed that: ?? ? . may be that the detenu is a smuggler whose tribe (and how their numbers increase) deserves no sympathy since ..... of the state and it is not possible to prevent his activities by the application of ordinary laws. he may therefore, be detained under the provision of the national security act, 1980. --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- yours faithfully, sd/- sr. superintendent of police, imphal west district, manipur. no.22/spl-cell/2011 (97) imphal, the 22nd august, 2011 copy to:- 1. the inspector general ..... provided by the law have been scrupulously observed and the subject is not deprived of his personal liberty otherwise than in accordance with law. section 8(1) of the act, which merely re-enacts the constitutional requirements of article 22(5), insists that all basic facts and particulars which influenced the detaining authority in arriving at the requisite satisfaction ..... . whereas, i, k. radhakumar singh, district magistrate, imphal west, manipur, am satisfied that his activities are prejudicial to the maintenance of public order under section 3(2) of national security act, 1980; whereas, it is considered necessary to detain shri thiyam imocha singh @ imphal city (52 yrs) s/o (l) th. chaoba singh of pallen wajang village, p.o. kakching .....Tag this Judgment!