Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: himachal pradesh Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.016 seconds)

Sep 24 1977 (HC)

Purshotam Dass Vs. Jaishi Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-24-1977

Reported in : AIR1978HP51

..... filed by one rash behari sanyal under section 3 (1) calcutta improvement (appeals) act, 1911, from a decision of the president of the calcutta improvement tribunal by virtue of provisions of section 77 (1) (b), bengal act 5 of 1911. dealing with the question costello, j. has made the following observations which make ..... relied upon the observations of rankin, c. j. in ganesh das v. khanthu reported in air 1935 lah 448. a full bench of the punjab high court (circuit bench at delhi) has exhaustively, considered all the decisions on the point and has disapproved the above view taken by the rajasthan ..... questions cannot convert the nature of the proceedings. it is, therefore, not correct to say the reference under section 30 of the land acquisition act partakes the character of a declaratory suit simply because the court has to make an incidental inquiry about the legal status of the rival claimants.12 ..... therefore, when there are more than one interested person, whatever amount is awarded to each of the interested persons is the 'amount awarded' under the act. under the circumstances, the expression 'amount awarded' cannot be limited to the award of total amount of compensation for the acquired land. so far ..... namely :--(1) there must be a memorandum of appeal; (2) that memorandum of appeal should be against an order relating to compensation under any act for the time being in force for the acquisition of land for public purposes; and (3) there should also be a claim which involves difference .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 1977 (HC)

Tralok Chand and anr. Vs. Arjun Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-28-1977

Reported in : AIR1978HP2

..... 31-3-1965.3. evidence further reveals that thereafter on 21-11-1955 said kartar singh filed a petition under section 4 of the punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 as applied to himachal pradesh in the court of the rent controller, solan for the fixation of the fair rent of the premises ..... eviction of the respondent-defendants therefrom. the suit is with reference to the premises known as old khalsa hotel situated on the mall, solan bearing municipal nos 71/2 and 71/3. the respondents herein are the heirs and legal representatives of late sardar kartar singh who was occupying the suit ..... in ambala bus syndicate v. indra motors kurali reported in (1968) 70 pun lr 960 a division bench of the punjab high court considered the provisions of east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 and the effect of section 15 which made the decision of the rent controller final with regard to the matters ..... execution of a decree passed in a suit for eviction of a tenant in possession of a building after the commencement of the punjab act but does not prohibit institution of a suit for eviction of a tenant in possession of a building or rented land. it was ..... become evidentthat nowhere therein the defendantshave raised the contention relating toholding over. the principle of holdingover as found enacted in section 116 of thet. p. act rests on an implied agreementbetween the landlord and the tenantconcerned regarding the continuation ofthe tenancy rights even after the original tenancy has come to an end. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //