Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: himachal pradesh Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.015 seconds)

Jan 10 1986 (HC)

Land Acquisition Collector, H.P., P.W.D., Solan and anr. Vs. Jeet Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-10-1986

Reported in : AIR1987HP71

..... originally enacted, had provided for the payment of interest at the rate of 'six percentum' per annum. however, by section 5 of the land acquisition (punjab amendment) act, 1953 (2 of 1954) (hereinafter referred to as 'the punjab act'), which received the assent of the president on jan. 1, 1954 and came into force on and with effect from jan. 9, 1954, the word ..... and interest at the rate of six per cent per annum on the compensation amount from nov. 30, 1950, that is when the land was taken possession of by the municipality, till march 31, 1958, that is, the date of the award. on a reference to the district court, the compensation was enhanced and solatium and interest at the rate of ..... or arable land needed for public purposes, after expiration of fifteen days from the publication of the notice mentioned in section 9(1) of the act. the fact that on 30-11-1950 it was the municipality that took possession and not the government would not make any difference as the acquisition of the land by the government was at the instance ..... similar argument was considered and rejected. the proceedings for the acquisition of land therein involved were started by the publication of a notification under section 4 of the act on april 12, 1956 at the instance of the guntur municipality. the land acquisition collector gave his award on march 31, 1958. much prior to the initiation of the acquisition proceeding, however, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 1986 (HC)

Paramjit Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-06-1986

Reported in : 1987CriLJ1266

..... learned lower court has, however, brushed aside this evidence and has solely relied upon the entry said to be made in the birth register maintained by the municipal committee, kharar in the state of punjab (ex.pw10/b) for the determination of the age of the prosecutrix wherein her date of birth has been recorded as aug. 13,1967.27. this, however ..... per this document the prosecutrix was born on aug. 13,1967 and the very next day this birth j date was registered in the register of births maintained by the municipal committee, kharar and it is rather unusual that overnight the prosecutrix would have been given the name as 'gurmilo1 as usually the newly born child is not given the name ..... person facing trial in the court hangs in the balance on the determination of age of the prosecutrix in such cases. the various provisions in the criminal procedure code and the evidence act with regard to investigations, searches and arrests provide procedural safeguards to vouchsafe the underhand dealings on the part of the officials executing them. in other words, they are statutorily considered ..... the authority of the supreme court, the certificate of this type with regard to the birth entry is per se admissible in evidence under s 35 of the indian evidence act. however, despite this, i strongly feel that in cases of this nature the necessity of calling the original register with regard to the relevant birth entry can hardly be overemphasized .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1986 (HC)

Mohan Datt Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-08-1986

Reported in : 1987CriLJ1677

..... concern itself about trifles, does not apply to them.14a. thus having regard to the unequivocal and authoritative verdict of the hon'ble supreme court in municipal committee, amritsar v. hazara singh (1975 cri lj 928) (supra), there remains no doubt whatsoever that the contents of the milk in question must ..... a three judge bench of the supreme . court then finally set this matter at rest in (1975) 1 fac 271 : (1975 cri lj 928), municipal committee, amritsar v. hazara singh, when it was observed :it is plain from submission of counsel that the appellant's grievance is not so much against ..... only some in the affirmative despite the full bench decision of that court in the affirmative.11. then some other high courts, namely, rajasthan, delhi and punjab and haryana have also answered this proposition in the negative as is reflected by the following cases :-(1979) 1 fac 89, parasram v. state of ..... construed, i.e., whether the same is mandatory or directory, in : 1983crilj448 dalchand v. municipal corporation bhopal. therein the provisions of rule 9(j) which have now been amended and incorporated in rule 9a of the act, had come in for such construction before their lordships. rule 9(j) before its amendment read ..... variability, whether the same renders it .injurious to health or not.14. a full bench of the punjab and haryana high court then in (1976) 2 fac 44 : (1976 cri lj 1648), state of punjab v. teja singh then reviewed all its previous d.b. judgments as also cited supra and overruled .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //