Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 496 results (0.023 seconds)

Jun 30 2009 (HC)

Hutchison Essar South Ltd., Prestige Blue Chip Represented by Its Depu ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR4255; 2009(4)KCCR2459

..... supra the apex court left open the question as to whether clause (e) of bye- law 7 of the said bye-laws under the punjab municipal act, 1911, entitles exemption from tax over advertisements exhibited by retailers or persons. this judgment, in my considered opinion does not support the case of the ..... of cigarettes, among other things, in the building falls within the proviso.11. in new delhi municipal committee's case (supra 3), what tell for consideration was the bylaws framed under the punjab municipal act, 1911, providing exemption from tax in respect of 'name board' displayed by the traders on their own ..... or property fronting any street.9. in v. vasudev bhat's case (supra 1), the third proviso to section 129-a of the city municipal act reads thus:provided further that no such tax shall be levied on any advertisement which is not a sky - sign and which (a)----- ( ..... . counsel for the petitioners points out to the third proviso to section 134 of the act and submits that identical provision in section 129-a, third proviso and explanation (2) of the madras city municipal act (iv/1919), in the matter of claim of exemption from advertisements tax, having arisen ..... remove the boards displayed in the premises of the dealers/distributors/retailers, for non-payment of advertisement tax under the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976, for short the 'act', the petitioners having invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court was disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to file necessary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1998 (HC)

Dr. Radhakrishna Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Hosur, Hubli an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(2)KarLJ637

..... interest of the land owner.23. in yogendra pal's case, supra, the supreme court has held that the provisions of section 192(1)(c) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 and section 203(1)(c) of the haryana municipal act, 1973 are violative of article 14 of the constitution and are void on the ground of discrimination that section 192(1) (c) of the said ..... in pt. chet ram vashist case, supra, is also of no assistance to the petitioners. while considering section 313 of the delhi municipal corporations act, it is observed by the supreme court that there is no provision under the act, calling upon the land owner to surrender the land free of cost. in the said view of the matter, the supreme court held ..... act, provides that the land owner who surrendered less than 25 per cent of his land is not entitled for compensation and if it exceeds more than 25 per ..... and another and pt. chet ram vashist (dead) by l.rs v municipal corporation of delhi.15. in order to appreciate the above said contentions it is useful to extract section 32 of the act 1987.-'32. formation of new extension or layouts or making new private streets.--(1) notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any law for the time being in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 1997 (HC)

Smt. Kathiza and Others Vs. the District Magistrate and Deputy Commiss ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR537; 1998(1)KarLJ162

..... so as not to fit into article 19(6) of the constitution.(d) learned counsel for the appellants next referred to ram dial v state of punjab. there were two provisions of the punjab municipalities act, 1911 that the supreme court was considering therein. section 14(e) enabled the state government, for any reason which it may deem affecting the public interest, ..... to direct a seat of the specified member elected or appointed to the municipal council to have fallen vacant on a particular date. section 16 was another provision ..... it was dangerous to life, health and property, and, therefore, the calcutta tramways company was required to take licence under the said section 437(1)(b) of the calcutta municipal act, 1951. the supreme court held the said provision, namely section 437(1)(b) which so made the opinion of the corporation conclusive and non-justiciable, as having unreasonably restricted ..... counsel for the appellants is corporation of calcutta v calcutta tramways company limited, calcutta. the supreme court was considering section 437(1)(b) of the calcutta municipal act, 1951 making the opinion of the municipal corporation conclusive and not justiciable on the question as to when any such opinion of the corporation could be called dangerous to life or property, etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 1988 (HC)

N.A. Nagendrappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR324

..... municipality whether it is permissible for the state government to hold elections in the municipality without delimitation of wards and preparation of fresh electoral rolls.' the supreme court observed as under:'the ..... be noticed. in. atma singh and ors. v. the state of punjab and ors., the supreme court was concerned with punjab delimitation of wards of municipalities rules 4 and 6. the question for consideration was -'when there is a notification issued under sub-section (3) of section 5 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, for inclusion of certain local areas within the limits of a ..... , under article 226 of the constitution did not have the benefit of the views of the supreme court on similar points that arose for consideration in punjab municipalities case and m,p. village panchayat act case state of madhya pradesh and ors. v. devilal : air1986sc434 to which i have made a detailed reference in the later part of this order and ..... executive order transferring a primary health centre to another place under the rules framed under the andhra pradesh panchayat samithis and zilla parishads act. i have already adverted to the 2 decisions of the supreme court, viz., punjab municipalities case and m.p.. panchayat case respectively. in my view these decisions have added a new dimension and given a new perspective .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1991 (HC)

State of Karnataka and Another, Etc. Vs. N.A. Nagendrappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1991Kant317; ILR1991KAR1057; 1991(2)KarLJ172

..... dated august 2, 1976, under sub-sec. (3) of s. 5 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, had been issued by the state government for inclusion of certain local areas within the limits of a municipality. a grama panchayat so included, challenged the validity of the said notification by a writ ..... impugned in the writ petition. as a provision in the punjab municipal act was amended making it obligatory for the state government to hold election to the municipality before june 30, 1979, election was held in 15 wards of the municipality as had been delimited earlier and with no fresh electoral rolls ..... case (1969 (17) law rep 757) (mys) (supra), a notification relating to delimitation of constituencies issued under s. 13 of the mysore municipalities act, 1964, and the elections held pursuant thereto have been quashed on a writ petition filed under art. 226 of the constitution after the commencement of ..... of the constitution in matters relating to elections. before dealing with this question we may set out section 43-b of the u.p. municipalities act, which is the provision of law dealing with cases where the election of the president is questioned : '43-b. judicial officer to ..... act, and the election to seats of mandal panchayat held pursuant thereto, we shall advert to it at the first instance.34. we have referred to the decision in alma singh's ease (supra) as the main decision because of the learned judge's statements which read :'in my view, the decision of the supreme court in punjab municipality .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1998 (HC)

Dr. Radhakrishna Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and ors. Vs. State ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3794

..... of the land owner.23. in the case of yogendra pal (supra), the supreme court has held that the provisions of section 192(1)(c) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 and section 203(1)(c) of the haryana municipal act, 1973 are violative of article 14 of the constitution and are void on the ground of discrimination that section 192(1)(c) of the said ..... case of pt. chet ram vashist (supra) is also of no assistance to the petitioners. while considering section 313 of the delhi municipal corporations act, it is observed by the supreme court that there is no provision under the act, calling upon the land owner to surrender the land free of cost. in the said view of the matter, the supreme court held ..... act, provides that the land owner who surrendered less than 25 per cent of his land is not entitled for compensation and if it exceeds more than 25 per ..... and ors, : air1994sc2550 . and pt. chet ramvashist by l.rs. v. municipal corporation of delhi, : air1995sc430 . 15. in order to appreciate the above said contentions it is useful to extract section 32 of the act 1987 : '32. formation of new extension or layouts or making new, private streets.-(1) notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any law for the time being in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 1990 (HC)

Shami and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1018; ILR1990KAR2099

..... and complicated problem of street trading in these areas. in bombay hawkers' union v. bombay municipal corporation, : air1985sc1206 , this court suggested that schemes be framed to regulate ..... delhi areas. some of them have licences/tehbazari from municipal corporation of delhi/new delhi municipal committee but most of them are squatters. there is practically no law regulating street trading in delhi/new delhi. the skeletal provisions in the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 and the punjab municipal act, 1911 can hardly provide any regulatory measures to the enormous ..... the hawking business by creating hawking and non-hawking zones. again in municipal corporation of delhi v. gurnam ..... make law permitting pavement trading subject to reasonable restrictions in public interest on the lines laid down by the supreme court in sodan singh v. new delhi municipal committee, air 1989 sc 1988. 3. in the statement of objections filed by respondent-1 to 3, they have denied knowledge of the petitioners' carrying .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1968 (HC)

Appasaheb Annappa Sirguppi Vs. Town Municipal Council, Ramdurg

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1970Kant70; AIR1970Mys70; ILR1969KAR286; (1969)1MysLJ290

..... tarakaram invites our attention to a decision of the supreme court reported in : [1965]1scr350 , subhash chandra v. municipal corporation, delhi, where the supreme court considered the provisions of sections 232 and 235 of the punjab municipal act (3 of 1911). the provisions of sections 232 and 235 considered in the said decision read as follows:--'232. power to suspend action ..... of committee. -- the commissioner or deputy commissioner may by order in writing suspend, within the division or district respectively, the execution of any resolution or order of a committee or joint committee, or prohibit the doing of any act ..... may thereupon confirm, modify or rescind the order.' the provisions of section 306 of the act are substantially similar to those of sections 232 and 235 of the punjab municipal act. while considering the effect of an order passed under section 232 of the punjab municipal act, which corresponds to the order passed by the deputy commissioner, belgaum, in exercise of his ..... powers under section 306 (1) of the act, the supreme court observes as follows:-- 'it has to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1964 (HC)

P. Bhuvaneswaraiah and ors. Vs. State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1965Kant170; AIR1965Mys170; (1964)2MysLJ470

..... the word 'rate'. in some of the statutes the word 'rate' is used but the tax is again on the annual value.' the punjab municipalities act, (act no. iii of 1911) provided for levy of a tax on buildings and lands and it further provided various modes for assessment, one of which is the annual letting ..... and buildings have been known to indian legislatures for over 50 years, and find place as such in the municipal acts passed by different provinces.'the federal court in ralla ram ` province of east punjab held that where the annual rental value is the basis of a tax, that tax does not necessarily ..... on urban immoveable property in exertion of its powers under entry 86 of the union list.(111) the taxes or rates levied under the different municipalities acts in operation in the different rating areas of the state are property taxes coming within the scope of entry 49 of the state list. if the ..... not be less than 121/2per cent or greater than 16 per cent of its annual value. the hyderabad district municipalities act, 1956, by section 96 read with section 97 empowers the municipalities situated within the hyderabad area of the state to levy a property tax on lands and buildings provided that the ..... the ground area; and (2) on the basis of running foot of frontage in streets and bazaars. vide section 61 of punjab act iii of 1911. the madras village panchayats act, 1950, (madras act x of 1950) by section 64 empowers, panchayats to levy house tax on all houses, other than huts, in the village .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 1986 (HC)

Town Municipal Council Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1369

..... ., : [1981]1scr746 the supreme court was concerned with the action taken under sub-section (1) of section 238 of the punjab municipal act. the new delhi municipal committee was superseded in exercise of the power under sub-section (1) of section 238 of the punjab municipal act by the government. therefore, in that case invalidity of a provision of an enactment being violative of article 14 of ..... were governed by the karnataka village panchayats and local boards act, 1959. on the corning into force of the act, the karnataka village panchayats and local boards act, 1959, stands repealed. similarly, the municipal councils in the state except municipal corporations are governed by the karnataka municipalities act, 1964. this enactment is not repealed because all the municipal councils are not to be converted into mandal panchayats under ..... the act. it is only such of the municipalities which are in exercise of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //